theway2k’s blog

The Danger is MORE than Islamist Terrorism

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:15:41 -0500

Here is another wake-up moment that will likely be pooh-poohed by blind Left and decried as racism or an attack on the freedom to practice the theo-political cult know as Islam (as you probably know I prefer Mohammedanism).

Those of you who call yourselves moderates and Slanted Right need to educate yourself and (God Please!) be aware there is an Islamic agenda. Although that agenda is funded by radical Muslims (Sunni and Shia), that agenda is extremely influential on the thinking of Muslims who publicly abhor the violence perpetuated by radical Islamic terrorists.

How or why is that possible?

Because there is a silent movement among well funded Islamists to silently slide into Western finance and economy with concepts of Sharia Finance. The Capitalists of the West buy into it because if it makes a profit it cannot be bad. Western Leftists of ignorant of Sharia Finance because of their blind concepts of egalitarianism that chooses to humanistically accept Mohammedans as multi-cultural equals not realizing that Mohammedans do not share Western egalitarianism.

What I am saying my fellow Americans and deluded Europeans is this: Wealthy Mohammedans influenced by Wahhabi/Muslim Brotherhood Sunnis or Twelver Shi’ites are utilizing the West’s own laws and financial institutions like the devil in Eden deceiving Eve. You know: bite this fruit of Islamist funding and endowments and the money will make you wise.

Unfortunately the deception is to systematically tear down Western Culture and ease Islamic Culture in its place. It is almost as if the transnational terrorists are an armed distraction while the little foxes enter the hen house and eat the chickens and their progeny and the farmer is off hunting for big wolves.

I have yet another long essay for you to read that paints a clear picture of that which I am writing. One of the authors is Rachel Ehrenfeld who a Saudi Islamist billionaire tried to silence by using foreign courts (to America) in a civil suit which does not use American jurisprudence.

Rachel lost the suit (not travelling across the ocean) but won the war. New York has enacted what has become known as Libel Terrorism Protection Act and the Federal Government is working on legislation to protect all Americans.

JRH (Hat tip to ACT)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

The Danger is MORE than Islamist Terrorism

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:15:41 -0500

3 dollah (5th Column thinking)

How or why is that possible?

JRH (Hat tip to ACT)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam #9

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:20:00 -0500

War on Islam

I found this website called Political Islam. I signed up to receive a weekly e-newsletter which is also posted on the website. I pretty much agree with Political Islam’s purpose which is to expose and educate about Political Islam as well as to advocate ways or thoughts to with stand the death cult.

I like the website because it is definitely not Politically Correct. Frankly I suspect it is just a matter of time that American fifth column organizations like Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) will denounce the truth from the website as racist and bigoted.

So what! Sometimes you have to slap someone to wake them up!

I did post the last e-newsletter which is part of a series. I don’t know if it is in the middle or nearing the end of the series for the one I am posting today is Part 9.

JRH 6/8/08

****************************

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam

This newsletter is one of a series on the subject-Newsletter #9

Bill Warner

June 3, 2008

Political Islam

The Near Enemy

We have two sets of enemies. The far enemy is the politics of Islam. The near enemies are the dhimmi apologists, fueled by ignorance and multiculturalism and political correctness.

Our universities present Islamic history as a glorious triumph. Humanity's greatest moment came in the Islamic golden age. The Crusades were Western evil. Cultural self-loathing manifests in showing the history of the West as oppression and Islam is seen as liberating. Women's oppression under Islam is seldom discussed in feminist classes. Israel is condemned and jihadists are presented as "freedom fighters". Christianity is criticized, Islam is praised.

Leftist/liberal/progressive intellectuals give frequent speeches at universities while conservative speakers are sometimes forbidden to speak or toughs are allowed to drive them from the stage.

The dhimmis and the oppressed does not exist in universities. Muslims dictate what will be said about Islam in textbooks.

The news media rarely publishes anything about the Islamic doctrine. Most Islamic terror is never mentioned. The dots are never connected. Each event of Islamic violence is seen on its own and never as part of a pattern. The media love to follow up any bad news about Islam with Muslims speaking "nice".

The near enemy finds good reasons not to publish Mohammed cartoons, and find reasons to feel good about being a dhimmi. The near enemy criticized the Pope when he gave a historic quote about Islam's violence even when Muslims killed Christians in protest and called for the Pope's death.

A public policy of political correctness and multiculturalism forbids criticism of Islam as being racist and violent.

Pacifism

The elites have a solution for Islam. War is evil and causes suffering. If you treat people well, they will treat you well. This is a logical fallacy that if we treat others well they will treat us well. That is true, if and only if, they follow the Golden Rule.

So if the Golden Rule inspires you to be non-violent, and if the person you are dealing with also practices the Golden Rule, all is fine. But if the other person doesn't follow the Golden Rule, then they can take advantage of you.

Let's take three brief historical examples. The Buddhists of ancient Afghanistan were the descendents of Alexander the Great's warriors. The warriors had been converted to pacifism by Buddhism. Along came Islam and killed every single pacifist who would not convert to Islam. The result is that Buddhism was annihilated in Central Asia.

Martin Luther King applied Gandhi's non-violence to civil rights and it worked. Why? American culture was infused with the Golden Rule and we changed. If Martin Luther King had tried non-violence in Mecca to protest Arabia's religious apartheid, he would have been imprisoned or driven out. Islam does not follow the Golden Rule.

Gandhi used non-violence to shame the British over their rule of India and it worked since the British honored the Golden Rule. But when India practices tolerance with Muslims in India, they get taken advantage of every time.

Pacifists are idealists, not pragmatists, so they claim that any historical failure of pacifism is due to the fact that they just were not pacifistic enough.

All pacifists are social parasites. Every pacifist lives in a nation that was created by blood, since every nation's borders were a result of a violent struggle. Every pious pacifist depends upon someone else to do the dirty work of violence to protect them.

Pacifism can be seen as the societal version of AIDS. AIDS destroys the body's ability to defend itself against infections. Pacifism destroys a society's ability to defend itself against aggression.

Politics is a matter of perception. What pacifists don't know is that Islam sees them as not as a kind and reasonable people, but as dhimmis. Dhimmis are indistinguishable from pacifists. They both submit to Islam on whatever issue is at hand.

An Ethical Basis for War

Let's define the situation:

· Islam has a dualistic ethical system that denies the nature Golden Rule. It posits that all people are not equal.

· Islam is a dualistic political system that divides all the world into believers and non-believers.

· Islam has an eternal, universal mandate to annihilate all political systems based upon the ethics of unity.

· Intimidation, demands, and violence may be used against the kafirs.

· 270,000,000 kafirs have been killed by political Islam. Over half of Buddhism, Christianity and Hinduism have been annihilated by political Islam.

· Islam cannot be reformed.

· Compromise is only a step towards dhimmitude.

There is no compromise that is logically possible between dualistic ethics and ethics of unity. There is no halfway point between honesty and deceit, freedom and slavery, equality and dhimmitude.

So the choice is between submission and annihilation or war and freedom. The third choice is dhimmitude, or a slow death, since every dhimmi population becomes Islamic over time.

We propose that to preserve our ethical civilization we must defeat political Islam. The question is: how shall we conduct this war?

Bill Warner

Signup for our weekly newsletter.

________________________

Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

It is Time to Openly Confront Islamic Effrontery of the West

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:13:09 -0500

LiveLeak Apology on Free Speech

Islamofascism and the inherent Theo-political cult of death known as Islam to adherents and as Mohammedanism to people like me that have disdain for a medieval threat of violence that terrifies those that love Liberty and Freedom has struck fear into LiveLeak.

LiveLeak was the video service I used to share the Movie Short Fitna to readers who wished to be educated about the true nature of Mohammedanism. That link now leads to a LiveLeak apology to its clientele because the fear of death threats to its staff constrained them to cave into Islamofascism to place security above the passion of Freedom.

Actually I cannot blame LiveLeak. With governments in the West promoting Appeasement to Mohammedans at the cost of Freedom and Liberty that has evolved in the world with the example of the American experiment after the Revolutionary War.

Western governments and the U.S. government have allowed litigation, the fear of Mohammedan rioting and the threat of Islamic terrorism killing citizens in the West in the name of Mohammed and Allah to Appease the protests of Mohammedans that value medieval Sharia Law above the modern concept of Freedom and Liberty.

Thanks to World Net Daily I have found a Part 1 and Part 2 division of the LiveLeak version on YouTube. My wonder is this: Will YouTube experience pressure to cave into Islamofascism and depreciate Freedom and Liberty as LiveLeak was forced to do?

It is time for the Governments of the West to put down their differences of Leftwing ideology and Rightwing ideology and confront the foreign cultural values of Theo-political Mohammedan ideology aggressively to protect not only our citizens but to defend the levels of Freedom and Liberty the West has attained.

If aggressively means deporting residential aliens and/or jailing naturalized citizens that support the death cult that expects acts of violence to rain down on people utilizing Freedom of Speech or Conscience, then so be it.

As an American, I for one have grown weary and impatient that Political Correctness terminates my Constitutional Rights of Freedom and Liberty deeming my criticism of Mohammedanism as “Hate Speech” when in fact my criticism of Mohammedanism is a defense of Freedom and Liberty. Frankly I do not care if Western Freedom and Liberty offends Mohammedanism. I am an American living in secular-political nation with a heritage of Christianity that has influenced right, wrong and principles of Justice.

Come on LEFT and RIGHT, we are not each other’s enemy common enemy to the way we live. That enemy is Mohammedanism as expressed by radical Islamism with greater and greater acceptance by Mohammedans in general. I am speaking to the LEFT and RIGHT: we disagree on the direction America should take, but we agree on using interpretations of Constitutional Law to find that direction. Mohammedanism seeks to eliminate the path of Freedom and Liberty embedded in the American mind of the LEFT and RIGHT.

Americans UNITE! Even more important: Western style nations UNITE! Let us confront Mohammedanism even as they accuse the West anyway. It is time for a 21^st century Crusade.

Now I know Leftwing Academic historians have painted the ugly facts of the medieval Crusades. Those facts are accurately ugly. However the demon of Political Correctness fails to equally paint the ugly facts of Mohammedan military advancement and conquests that were equally if not heinously worse than the ugliness of the medieval Crusades.

The thing is the Mohammedan mindset of medieval ugliness is alive and well in the 21^st century whereas it is the West that has such principles of the Geneva Conventions (even though many in the West have only partially practiced those Conventions or totally ignored them).

The adherence to the Geneva Conventions (of degrees of the lack thereof) is a modern phenomena compared to the medieval principles utilized by Islamists extracted from their own holy writings. Yes I know there are compassionate Mohammedan holy writings; however in the 21^st century Islamism leans on the interpretations of medieval brutality of death and destruction to non-Mohammedans (fakir) and Mohammedans that do not agree with Islamist interpretations.

It is time to meet 21^st century Jihad with a 21^st century Crusade that is more secular than religious and with the rules of engagement that the Allies used in WWII to defeat the Axis Powers utterly with the terms of unconditional surrender. Forsake principles of Political Correctness, it will destroy the West.

JRH

Part 1

Part 2

Read and post comments | Send to a friend