Man I have to tell you Church’s Chicken is one of the best fast food franchises serving good tasting Chicken. Alas, being a confirmed Islamophobe, I may think twice before I patronize Church’s Chicken again.
JRH 5/1/08
Man I have to tell you Church’s Chicken is one of the best fast food franchises serving good tasting Chicken. Alas, being a confirmed Islamophobe, I may think twice before I patronize Church’s Chicken again.
JRH 5/1/08
A Comment left by “Bushtolike Pilon” denigrated the United States of America at this blogspot post: “Al-Sadr may restart full-scale fight against US in Iraq.” I have posted this same title on most of the social blogs I am a member of as well.
This is what Bushtolike Pilon wrote:
The greatest worldwide thief is the blue eyed devil! Every where he goes there is only destruction, mayhem and death. Wake up buddy who is more blood thirsty for oil? The answer is the west and Usa!! You are just as fucking moron talking shit through your fat blue eyed ass.
Have fun for now as the BIG DRAGON China will soon kick your fat crap talking butt into chowmein. Have fun!!!
The person has to be a Lefty or a Muslim-America for the person broadcast the intellect of the low brow vulgar slang that is often used by the American Left. Obviously the person chose epithets rather than cogitative thinking to refute my opinion.
Here is my comment response:
There may indeed by a show down between America and China over oil. God forbid if China wins, then the Middle East would truly understand the brutality of an atheistic nation.
Mohammedans have their eye on Israel, USA and the West; however it is the largest persecutor of all religions that makes torture done by Mohammedans look like a picnic. Under Mao tse Tung (or which ever way you choose to write his name), China slaughtered over 35 MILLION people to re-educate and eradicate religion. A program still continued to this day against all religions and particularly focused on Christians, Buddhists (Tibet) and Mohammedans.
If you are a Mohammedan, you are a dumb ass to think China will not slaughter Mohammedans if they win such a confrontation with America. If you are a Communist, you are a dumb ass for supporting such a murderous government.
In fact look at list of genocides and note that America is not even on the list; however the rogue governments of the Middle East main suppliers of weapons are number one and two.
Oil is indeed an economic weapon used as an excuse for National Interests of Super Powers and imposing global intolerance by third rate Mohammedan nations that have oil under their ground.
You know the third rate power nations will not win an oil war. You had better hope America wins if such a war arises. We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them.
Who did you say was blood thirsty for Oil?
UPDATE: I probably won’t continue to follow up anymore; however the commenter has left a similar comment this time under the name “anonymous.” I was not sure previously whether the person was a Marxist/Leftist or a Mohammedan. I now convinced the person is a Mohammedan.
I will first post the Mohammedan drivel followed immediately by my response:
Your list is written by the Usa itselt and a big lie. Vietnam is the American genocide and before that the genocide of the american indians who are still suffering under the invaders. Dont fool yourself we are not that dumb.
"We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them."The lie of millennium
You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc.
My response:
]]>Theway2k said...
Anonymous now I know you are a moron. That list was compiled NOT by the US Government but by one of the Left Wing universities in America. In fact I'd say Berkley is so deluded in its Leftism that they support Islamofascist Mohammedans over America in the Global War on Terror.
[Not in the original comment: It is true the Native Americans were mistreated horribly in history by the American Government as it expanded from the East Coast to the West Coast; however the Native Americans not only have full citizenship, freedom and liberty today but the Federal American Government provides extra perks and in some cases allow laws to occur that supersedes State and Local Government (revenue via the gambling industry as one example).
How many Church Bells ring in Mohammedan dominated land? What kind of equal rights under the law do Christian, Jews and non-Muslims have under the Mohammedan rule of law (in many cases where Medieval Sharia Law is the dominant foundation)?
Yes that is correct: ZIP, ZERO, NADA AND NOTHING.]
You said: "You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc."
That is the perfect description of a Mohammedan except maybe the alcohol (which is replaced by smoking drugs).
So Wake-Up America! This is the kind of deluded lies that Middle Eastern Mohammedans or American-Islamist Mohammedans truly believe. Even revisionist Leftist Academics disagree with the Mohammedan mind!
The Islamization of the United Kingdom has become evident. The UK is a Western Nation last time I looked at a map. That would mean the Judeo-Christian heritage is an influence on the land. O yeah, I just remembered. The Church of England is a State Church in the UK.
Well I just found this tidbit of information about a Mohammedan speeding in his automobile at more than twice the speeding limit which according to the Scottish part of the UK is illegal enough to have your Driver’s License revoked or so reports the Pirate’s Cove Blog.
The Scottish Judge was remarkably sympathetic to the Mohammedan’s plea to have the law of the land not apply to him. He is a good Mohammedan and has two wives that live in two different places. The pious Mohammedan, who surely prays to Mecca five times daily, needs his automobile to drive betwixt the two wives to fulfill his Mohammedan conjugal obligations.
So of course Scottish Justice should not take away the Mohammedan’s license to drive for serving the Mohammedan higher good is superior to the law of land and of course a endangering a kafir’s life is irrelevant to the superiority of Mohammedanism.
Evidently the Scottish Judge agreed. The Mohammedan kept his license and had to a 200 Pound Sterling fine. The fine was probably no problem because in Mohammedan law you are allowed up two four wives but only if you can afford to take care of the poor deluded sex-slave wives. Also the Scottish Judge overlooked the law in which polygamy is against the law.
]]>
It is beginning to boggle my mind how the Western World is being dictated to on the rule of law by a foreign culture that is a proven in violence among themselves and toward those who do not believe in that foreign culture. What am I talking about? It is the Theo-political cult known as Islam to the politically correct and as Mohammedanism to me after its blood thirsty founder Mohammed.
The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams is the symbolic head of Anglicans world wide, which includes the American version known as Episcopalians. Dr. Williams is publicly saying that Britain should adopt or incorporate Mohammedan Sharia Law into the legal system of Britain to accommodate the vast numbers of Mohammedans living in Britain.
I have some observations about this suggestion from the Archbishop of Canterbury. Let me start with my initial reaction when I first read this: Is the moron abandoning the Christian faith to a Theo-political cult whose aim is to convert people first by persuasion and second by the threat of violence up to and including execution? I mean Europe is all about Capital Punishment being the practice of a barbaric past. Yet the essence of Sharia Law is physically harsh up to including the death penalty for some of the most ludicrous of acts of law breaking. We are talking about honor killings for offending the Mohammedanism within the Mohammedan family, death for leaving Mohammedanism for another faith or atheism, death for insulting Mohammed and his Allah and probably more that I am unaware of.
Sharia Law allows polygamy and a means to divorce by simply pronouncing verbally I divorce you three times. Thieves punished under Sharia Law can loose hands in amputation. And what if a Mohammedan breaks a British law that is not illegal in Sharia Law - does the Mohammedan escape justice?
God help us if this becomes an issue in America.
If Mohammedans cannot live under the Rule of Law in the West the answer is simple: move to nations that practices Sharia Law or amend the Mohammedan faith to be compatible to Western Laws.
In America where religious issues and the Rule of Law is a big deal there is a precedent to follow. America is a secular nation that guarantees the free practice of religion of conscience as long as it conforms to the Rule of Law. The Precedent: Before Utah could be admitted into the Union of the United States of America the Mormons had to have a prophetic revelation; i.e. the official ending of the practice of polygamy. Once the revelation became official, Utah became a State.
My God America needs to stick to our foundational values to enforce one Rule of Law justly to all people regardless of Faith or Conscience and Britain should as well.
If the West does not stand up for its culture the permeation of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda for the West will become a reality before anyone can do anything to peacefully reverse it. Friends this will mean dhimmitude for non-Mohammedans.
I have never agreed with the term or the liberal church vision of a “Progressive Church.” The Archbishop of Canterbury is progressing Anglicans into a position of inferiority to the supremacist minded Mohammedans of the world.
See also Dhimmi Watch.
]]>
What do you think about when you here the phrase “Global Banking”?
I am no econ or finance major; however off the top of my mind I think of American and European Banking calling the shots for banking standards and procedures.
There is the World Bank designed to aid poor nations with funds and loans for development. The World Bank headquarters is located in Washington, D.C.
The International Monetary Fund is another Western banking powerhouse that is highly involved in global development. The IMF central administrative city is also in Washington, D.C.
A fellow named Patrick Wood has written an essay on how the Mohammedan principles of Sharia Law banking is mutually (i.e. Western flirting and Mohammedan demanding) becoming infused as the new Global Banking principle.
Some would call that a conspiracy theory of the Mohammedan agenda of using soft measures (i.e. utilizing Western Rule of Law to manipulate a slow transformation of Mohammedan harsh principles) to incorporate Sharia Law into gradual Mohammedan domination of Western Society.
I lean toward Islamophobia so I tend to buy into such agendas coupled with the writings and speeches of radical Islamists of both the Sunni and Shi’ite variety.
Since I am merely a voice of opinion and an expert of little I rely on those who study such subjects as economics, finance and banking to grasp a little understanding. I am wholly convinced that Islamism today as Communism in the Twentieth Century is the greatest threat to American and Western Liberty and Freedom.
So let us pay attention to Patrick Wood as he writes about “Global Banks Adopting Islam.” READ IT!
]]>
Victor Davis Hanson busts the chops of the incipient hypocrisy of Mohammedan complaints about the West vis-a-vie so-called pure Mohammedan moral culture.
In honesty the immorality that is allowed in the West due to abused Freedom of Speech, Choice, Religion, Thought and so on; is a valid complaint. The ever growing prurient attitudes of accepted vices are truly disappointing. Some vices are pushed as relatively moral according to Secular Humanistic standards of moral relativity.
I am embarrassed that the Mohammedans accusations are often correct. On the other hand Victor Davis Hanson points out the very thing Mohammedans accuse of the West are degradations that exist in their own society; they are just hidden or ignored due the power of the elites in Mohammedan society.
Materialistic shopping sprees of decadent luxurious items by oil rich royal families or families of oil rich dictators occur frequently. Homosexuality is as rampant in the Middle East as it is in the West, it is merely hidden. If it is discovered, then the poor devils are executed. Many Middle Eastern nations (Saudi Arabia in particular) still cut off hands for thievery (unless of course you are a member of the ruling elite – royal or republican). The drug trade that destroys the lives of the addicted is booming in the Middle East and the illicit drugs are marketed by some of the most notorious supporters of Sharia Law morality – Islamist terrorists.
Incidentally it is the same Islamist terrorists that receive monetary donations from Mohammedans that live in the West (Europe and America). In the USA the most notable Mohammedan organization that supports these illicit terrorists is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (read about CAIR’s actions HERE and HERE). Iranian client Terrorist Hezbollah (yes Hezbollah has attacked Americans directly) has America-Mohammedan Shi’ite organizations in America, particularly in Dearborn Dearbornistan, Michigan.
]]>
Apparently Hamas is the big dog in the Gaza Strip (AKA Hamastan) however not an absolute power. Hamas seems to be the Primus inter pares among a committee of Sharia Law minded Mohammedans. There are other Islamofascist groups that seem to be of the harsh al-Qaeda-like mind. Indeed it is one of these groups that have the actual possession of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. If Shalit is even alive Israel would have to negotiate through God knows what terrorist go-betweens and not just Hamas. If Hamas acknowledges that Shalit is dead murdered, then Israel would be free to engage in a punitive military exercise (That most in the West will foolishly condemn).
Let us examine the nature of Islamofascism in the Gaza Strip courtesy of CBN News:
JRH 7/25/07
]]>According to Britannica.com, a fifth column refers to any clandestine group or faction of subversive agents who attempt to undermine a nation's solidarity.
Who came up with the phrase, and what's with the columns? Emilio Mola Vidal, a Nationalist general during the Spanish Civil War (1936-39), originally coined the term. As four of his army columns moved on Madrid, the general referred to his militant supporters within the capital as his "fifth column," intent on undermining the loyalist government from within.
So the fifth column is a group of secret sympathizers or supporters of an enemy that engage in espionage or sabotage within defense lines or national borders.
Although it is fascinating to know who coined the term “Fifth Column” it is important to understand two words in this definition: “clandestine” and “subversive.”
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. (Declaration of Independence – Excerpt)
Okay I realize this post might be a little dated, however readers need to be made aware that Mohammedans in America are attempting to set apart the Law of the Land.
The Politically Correct are so concerned about Islamophobic Americans that they are willing to allow Mohammedans to enjoy their intolerant beliefs at the expense of non-Mohammedans. This issue has arisen in the Twin Cities (Minnesota) in which Mohammedan cab drivers refuse service to airport patrons that might violate their beliefs. Apparently a significant amount of cab drivers in the area are Mohammedan.
To uphold the ability of Mohammedans to discriminate against patrons that carry items that are legal is to allow a precedent of Mohammedan Sharia Law to be Superior to American Constitutional Law. This cannot happen!
JRH
******************************
Help Prevent Shari'a at Twin Cities Airport
Little Green Footballs
Date: 2/22/2007 at 6:42:07 pm
We’ve had several posts about the Muslim cab drivers at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport, and their refusal to accept passengers carrying alcohol and blind people with guide dogs, at the urging of the Muslim Brotherhood front group calling itself the Muslim American Society. Daniel Pipes sent out an email to his list on this subject, because the Metropolitan Airports Commission is inviting the public’s input on the matter. The public hearing notice for the Airports Commission is here: Taxicab Ordinance #102: Public Hearing Notice.
And here’s Daniel Pipes’ email on the subject: More on Those Alcohol-shy Minnesota Taxi Drivers.
Dear Reader:
A further decision is due in the controversy over taxi drivers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport who refuse to transport passengers visibly carrying alcohol. The Metropolitan Airports Commission, which has jurisdiction over the drivers, invites the public’s opinion; and I urge your involvement.
MAC has sent a notice (which I have posted in full on my website) that recounts developments since its decision in October 2006 to deny requests by drivers to distinguish between Shar’i-compliant and –noncompliant taxis. MAC writes:
For the past several months, the Metropolitan Airports Commission has worked with airport taxi industry representatives and with leaders from the Muslim American Society and the Somali Justice Advocacy League. The goal was to find a solution acceptable to everyone and transparent to the customer seeking airport taxi service. Unfortunately, those discussions have not resulted in a workable, voluntary, consensus-based solution. As a result, the Airports Commission is proposing stricter penalties for refusal of service: a 30-day suspension of a driver’s airport taxi license for the first instance, and license revocation for a second instance.
Bravo to MAC. It is important that the drivers be sent a strong signal that they must obey the regulations. Were they allowed to boycott travelers with alcohol, I pointed out in “Don’t Bring That Booze into My Taxi,” that would intrude Islamic law “into a mundane commercial transaction in Minnesota” and could lead to the transport system as a whole being divided “between those Islamically observant and those not so.”
I appealed to readers in October to urge MAC to impose penalties on those who insist on imposing Shar’i norms in Minnesota and to send a message that this practice is unacceptable. The barrage of e-mails and phone calls had the hoped-for effect. According to airport spokesman Patrick Hogan back then, “we’ve heard from Australia and England. It’s really touched a nerve among a lot of people. The backlash, frankly, has been overwhelming. People are overwhelmingly against any kind of cultural accommodation.”
Again now, I appeal to all those opposed to application of the Shari’a in the United States to make their views heard in Minnesota. You can do this in either of two ways.
In writing: MAC is asking for “input from the public” through Friday, March 2, 2007, before it makes a decision on the proposed increase in penalties. Written comments should be addressed to:
Landside Operations Department
Metropolitan Airports Commission
MSP International Airport/Lindbergh Terminal
4300 Glumack Drive
Suite LT-3129B
Saint Paul, MN 55111-3010.In person: For those living in the Twin Cities area, MAC will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 27, 2007, at 2 p.m., to solicit testimony from the public via verbal or written testimony. The location will be at:
Ramada Mall of America (formerly, the Thunderbird Hotel)
2300 East American Boulevard
Bloomington, MinnesotaI thank you in advance.
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Pipes
]]>