5 posts tagged “scandal”
Well, well, well – the beginnings of scandalous alleged accusations that Democratic Party communicating wonder Barack Obama has been involved in illicit homosexual sex and a participant of illegal drugs as late as 1999 has been level by a homosexual by the name of Larry Sinclair.
Of course the Mainstream Media is taking a hands-off approach about the alleged accusations of Sinclair because Obama is the current darling charismatically promoting change yet not detailing any substance of change.
I am guessing no one will touch Sinclair’s allegations until he can demonstrate physical evidence to back up his story. Sinclair does seem determined to out Obama for he has filed civil public documents outlining the allegations in a civil suit.
If Sinclair manages to gain any traction in his exposé civil suit I wonder what the Obama and Democratic Party spin machine will be. For example homosexuality is not a criminal offense however Obama is married. Would Obama’s wife pull a Hillary and look the other way if truth is discovered in the Sinclair allegations?
Participating in controlled substances, i.e. using prescribed drugs abusively or drugs described as illegal narcotics could be a legal issue for Obama if the allegations are proven true. I mean Obama was a member of the Illinois State Congress in 1999 allegedly breaking the law.
Or will the devout believers of Obama’s promise of (empty) change lead voters themselves to look the other way. After all Bill Clinton perjured himself about being a sexual predator and was impeached by the House and exonerated by a Party line vote in the Senate and still remained popular with his Left Wing constituency who could care less about immoral acts in the White House.
I am pondering here: I wonder what the Mainstream Media would do if the reputation in question was the leading candidate for President in the Republican? Here is another thought: knowing the penchant for Social Conservative to be outraged at immoral behavior of the Left; is the Obama story a Hillary strategic planted story in collusion with Larry Sinclair to take Democratic Party votes away from Obama to win the Democratic Party nomination for herself?
Anyway it is all fascinating dirt that is closer to the present than the accusations of being a closet Muslim because of Obama’s childhood and youth.
The mud is beginning to fly.
Well, well, well – the beginnings of scandalous alleged accusations that Democratic Party communicating wonder Barack Obama has been involved in illicit homosexual sex and a participant of illegal drugs as late as 1999 has been level by a homosexual by the name of Larry Sinclair.
Of course the Mainstream Media is taking a hands-off approach about the alleged accusations of Sinclair because Obama is the current darling charismatically promoting change yet not detailing any substance of change.
I am guessing no one will touch Sinclair’s allegations until he can demonstrate physical evidence to back up his story. Sinclair does seem determined to out Obama for he has filed civil public documents outlining the allegations in a civil suit.
If Sinclair manages to gain any traction in his exposé civil suit I wonder what the Obama and Democratic Party spin machine will be. For example homosexuality is not a criminal offense however Obama is married. Would Obama’s wife pull a Hillary and look the other way if truth is discovered in the Sinclair allegations?
Participating in controlled substances, i.e. using prescribed drugs abusively or drugs described as illegal narcotics could be a legal issue for Obama if the allegations are proven true. I mean Obama was a member of the Illinois State Congress in 1999 allegedly breaking the law.
Or will the devout believers of Obama’s promise of (empty) change lead voters themselves to look the other way. After all Bill Clinton perjured himself about being a sexual predator and was impeached by the House and exonerated by a Party line vote in the Senate and still remained popular with his Left Wing constituency who could care less about immoral acts in the White House.
I am pondering here: I wonder what the Mainstream Media would do if the reputation in question was the leading candidate for President in the Republican? Here is another thought: knowing the penchant for Social Conservative to be outraged at immoral behavior of the Left; is the Obama story a Hillary strategic planted story in collusion with Larry Sinclair to take Democratic Party votes away from Obama to win the Democratic Party nomination for herself?
Anyway it is all fascinating dirt that is closer to the present than the accusations of being a closet Muslim because of Obama’s childhood and youth.
The mud is beginning to fly.
Newt Gingrich writes about his decision not to run for President in his Winning the Future E-newsletter that is part of HumanEvents.com.
Before it became evident that Fred Thompson was going to throw his hat in the field of candidates, Newt was one of my top favorites. Newt and the Clinton family are not exactly friends. Newt was involved in slick Willie being the second President of the United States to be impeached from Office. The only thing that saved Clinton’s cajones was a Democratic majority in the Senate.
Then Newt became slimed in a scandal himself – one of the greatest Republicans next to Reagan became embroiled in an extra-marital affair. Unlike slick Willie, Newt resigned from the Speaker’s Office in the House while President Clinton received the aid of Democratic Party buddies in the Senate and actually finished his term unscathed. This occurred even though an American President out right knowingly lied to the American people – “I did not have sex that woman.” Either a blow job and ejaculation is not sex or Slick Willie lied.
I can hear the Democratic fringe now: “Bush lied people died.” If indeed Bush lied (I am not totally convinced), it was not knowingly. Bush’s decision about war was based on the same Intelligence reports that the Democrats of high levels read and endorsed the invasion of Iraq.
Here is the thing: Newt admitted his mistake and resigned from one of the most powerful Offices in America – Speaker of the House.
God knows how many people the adulterer sex offender sparkled up the pinnacle of his power. Yet the dirt has slipped of slick Willie like Teflon and his wife rather than divorce him intends to follow Slick’s tarnished but endeared Leftist legacy to the White House.
Newt would have made an excellent Conservative President however I do not think his integrity could withstand the dirty tricks that began to be hurled by a Clinton machine if nominated as expected by the Democratic Party.
Newt would be a good VP or Cabinet member in a Republican Administration; nonetheless let us read the specifics as to why Newt made the final decision not run in 2008.
I just read an article that is an unearthing of another scandal for the United Nations. Really it is an indictment on the inefficiency and corruption of the Administration of former Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
I guess everyone is afraid to say it, but Annan mantle overlooked some of the worst human misery, genocides and the degeneration of the United Nations itself into a state of third world like administrative corruption.
Annan claimed ignorance over the “Oil for Food” scandal with Saddam Hussein. It was an ignorance that only a moron or a family member would believe.
Annan’s own son utilized U.N. funds for personal use.
And now the light is illuminating the darkness of U.N. involvement in aiding and abetting North Korea with its counterfeiting of United States currency.
Can anyone deny that Annan’s anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism has enabled the Mohammedan world to effectively propagandize against Israel and America? Much of the hatred in the world is the result of the U.N. under Annan criticizing a sliver slice of a nation known as Israel and siding with Israel’s enemies that surround the Land like a dreaded darkness keeping the sun from rising.
I do not have confidence that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (a South Korean) has the backing of politically to clean up Annan’s mess.
The United Nations has degenerated into a tool for anti-American and anti-Israeli nations and terrorist organizations bent on their demise. With no real military strength, the U.N. has turned Machiavellian influencing America’s European allies against America. The U.N. (particularly under Annan) has made stock on European hubris that has hated American hegemony and protection.
The only benefit the United Nations has for America is the Security Council. The way the organization of the U.N. is set up America has the power of the veto to undermine anti-American and anti-Israeli interests.
America should embark on its own Machiavellian path. America needs to turn the coalition of the willing into an economic and military alliance to counter global jihad and nations that wish to counter Pax American with their own shot of world domination. That domination would eschew the civil rights, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness that the American Revolution initiated between July 4, 1776 and March 4, 1789.
As long as the United Nations can be stopped by an American veto in the Security Council, the USA should remain. If the time should arise that an American veto at the Security Council holds no value or authority that is the time America should abandon the United Nations.
Do not think abandoning the U.N. would be a selfish act. The Arabs have the Arab League. Radical Islamist terrorist NGO’s have the Wahhabi sect, Muslim Brotherhood, Shi’ite Twelvers and more. Europe has the European Union. I am certain if you can think of some alliances that have goals and interests of commonality you could come up with more.
What U.N. self-investigation will nail the U.N. the big dogs with complicity to North Korean counterfeiting?
Senator Dianne Feinstein has resigned from Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee amid scandal that her votes benefited her husband’s business dealings to the tune of B as in billions of dollars.
WorldNetDaily offers all kinds of reasons for the Democratic Senator’s resignation; however I guess the most plausible reason is resigning might hold off investigation into a powerful Democrat’s conduct. Now that the Democrats control Congress it is doubtful any legitimate scrutiny will occur to ferret out corruption.
