theway2k’s blog

Activist Fed Court Again Legislates From Bench

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:18:25 -0500

The State of Oklahoma had passed one of the toughest anti-immigration laws on the State level in the USA.

Notice the past tense: U.S. District Judge (Yes the Federal level once again telling the State level what to do) Robin J. Cauthron issued a preliminary injunction temporarily halting the enforcement of the State Law saying Oklahoma’s Law is “substantially likely” to be unconstitutional.

Guess who filed in Federal Court to prevent Oklahoma’s enforcement of their legislative enacted State Law: “… the US Chamber of Commerce, the Oklahoma Chamber and other business groups.”

So the Chamber of Commerce and business groups are playing the “hurts the economy” card to overrule a State taking action where the Federal Government is woefully deficient in protecting the American way of life.

The Republicans failed to use their one time majority to change the landscape of Left Wing Activist Judges view of an evolving Constitution. “Evolving” meaning: to judicially legislate from the Bench relative a Leftist view of society rather than actually interpreting the content of the US Constitution. The Republican failure was in being cordial in parliamentary rules to the Democrats.

Do you think the Democratic Party controlled Congress will be slow in adding more Left Wing Judges to the Federal Judiciary if Marxist Barack Hussein Obama is elected President in November 2008?

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Mohammedanism Superior to UK Law of the Land

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:40:59 -0500

Islamic Supremacism 2

The Islamization of the United Kingdom has become evident. The UK is a Western Nation last time I looked at a map. That would mean the Judeo-Christian heritage is an influence on the land. O yeah, I just remembered. The Church of England is a State Church in the UK.

Well I just found this tidbit of information about a Mohammedan speeding in his automobile at more than twice the speeding limit which according to the Scottish part of the UK is illegal enough to have your Driver’s License revoked or so reports the Pirate’s Cove Blog.

The Scottish Judge was remarkably sympathetic to the Mohammedan’s plea to have the law of the land not apply to him. He is a good Mohammedan and has two wives that live in two different places. The pious Mohammedan, who surely prays to Mecca five times daily, needs his automobile to drive betwixt the two wives to fulfill his Mohammedan conjugal obligations.

So of course Scottish Justice should not take away the Mohammedan’s license to drive for serving the Mohammedan higher good is superior to the law of land and of course a endangering a kafir’s life is irrelevant to the superiority of Mohammedanism.

Evidently the Scottish Judge agreed. The Mohammedan kept his license and had to a 200 Pound Sterling fine. The fine was probably no problem because in Mohammedan law you are allowed up two four wives but only if you can afford to take care of the poor deluded ~~sex-slave~~ wives. Also the Scottish Judge overlooked the law in which polygamy is against the law.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Rule of Law Under Islam

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:20:08 -0600

Islam for Dhimmis

If there is such a thing as Moderate Mohammedanism it is in only practiced in Western style democratic nations.

At the ccpga Yahoo Group there is a huge amount of citations of non-Islamist (ergo the opposite being moderate) Mohammedans experiencing judgments from the rule of law in various Middle Eastern nations.

The post begins with a Dhimmi Watch post about a Christian woman being thrown in the slammer in Egypt for stating her religion as Christianity on her Marriage Certificate.

Evidently her father converted from Christianity to Mohammedanism briefly then converted back to Christianity. That is illegal according to the law of the land in Egypt. The father’s brief flirtation with Mohammedanism made all his children (whether they wanted to or not) legally Mohammedans. Thus the Egyptian Christian according to the law of the land was a Mohammedan. She broke the law trying to marry as a Christian.

The ccpga Post goes on with comments about the Dhimmi Watch post some of them telling accounts of other enforcement of the rule of law in Egypt.

Now if this is justice in a moderate Mohammedan society imagine the ruthlessness of Islamism.

Now imagine that Islamism is the predominant force in America and the West seeking Mohammedan converts and supporting the biggest and the newest Mosques in America and the West.

Now I am a huge believer in America’s First Amendment right that implies Freedom of Religion or philosophical conscience; however if this is the kind of rule of law moderate Mohammedans expect to be practiced in America, I am for some religious profiling to make sure Islamist teaching is NOT a right and a test to make sure a moderate Mohammedan is moderate by American Constitutional rule of law.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Liberalism v Islamism

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Mon, 21 May 2007 21:16:32 -0500

Christian Knight Calling Defend Western Civ

Melanie Phillips defines Islamism (as opposed to Islam/Mohammedanism) and liberalism. Basically she calls Islamism a political ideology based on Islam and Wahabbism school of thought. Phillips’ definition of liberalism is in the classical sense. Classical liberalism is closer to what Americans would call the conservative movement.

The Phillips essay is an awesome analysis of how radical Islamism takes advantage of classical liberalism. Worse classical liberalism maintains that radical Islamists in the West (or in Britain in Phillips’ case) should have their freedom of expression even if it means the demise classical liberalism.

READ THE ESSAY.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend