2 posts tagged “pro-arab”
I was unaware that there were some Evangelical organizations and Ministers that actually support the creation of a sovereign Palestinian State. I am aware many Mainline Christian denominations indeed support such a travesty and even malign Israel’s Jewish State to defend themselves from so-called Palestinian Arabs.
BUT Evangelicals supporting a two-State existence is astounding! I am particularly astounded because those that claim leadership of so-called Palestinian Arabs are blood thirsty terrorists with the end goal to destroy Israel and Jews from the land.
Do not be persuaded that President Abbas of the Palestine Authority (PA) and Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) has suddenly become a moderate Arab Mohammedan willing to negotiate for peaceful coexistence with Israel. The PA points of negotiation if accepted by Israel will be the demise of the nation and potentially lead to a 21st century holocaust; viz. the total fall back of Israel to pre-1967 borders (which includes part of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount) and the so-called right of return of Arabs that fled Israel when the Arab world surrounding Israel invaded with the intent of destroying the Israeli State.
Jerusalem and the Temple Mount are sacred to Judaism and have been so much longer than the existence of Mohammedanism. Flooding Israel with Arabs or more precisely, the descendants of Arabs that fled Israel in 1948 at the behest of expectant victory thirsty Arab invaders will terminate the Jewish State. Palestinian Arabs are fully aware of this!
Thus You MUST READ an open response letter to this minority of Evangelicals from the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), a Christian organization residing in Israel with chapters extending world wide. The ICEJ is more representative of the majority mindset of Evangelicals.
JRH
**************************
ICEJ Response to Evangelical Letter
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
International Christian Embassy Jerusalem
ICEJ Special Release
Recently, a group of 34 Evangelical Christian leaders in America wrote an open letter to U.S. President George W. Bush to register their support for his efforts to achieve a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and to clarify that not all Evangelicals oppose such a resolution of this long-running dispute. As a leading Christian Zionist ministry, we value the opportunity to graciously respond to these Christian brothers, particularly in regards to their handling of the Biblical "mystery" that is Israel.
We respect the right of American citizens to engage with their government on matters of such immense importance as the Israeli-Arab conflict. We cannot agree, however, with the historical and moral equivalence that these Christian leaders have drawn between Israel and the Palestinians, nor with their exegesis of Scripture.
The Jewish people have an ancient claim and attachment to the Land of Israel dating back 4000 years to the Hebrew Patriarch Abraham. There they became a nation that made universal contributions to all humankind, not least of which are the Bible and the Messiah that we Christians hold so dear. In modern times the Jews have returned to their ancient homeland many centuries after being violently uprooted from it not once, but twice. On repeated occasions, Israel has demonstrated its bona fide willingness to partition the land into separate Jewish and Arab states for the sake of peace with their Arab neighbours.
In contrast, though the Palestinian Arab presence in the Land of Israel dates back several generations, they never built an independent nation here and, with all due respect, have made no positive contributions of note to the world. Palestinian nationalism gained traction a mere 40 years ago and only then due to the movement’s adoption of terrorist tactics. It is an historic fact that at every point in which the Jewish people agreed to a two-state solution, the Palestinian Arabs have rejected such compromise in favour of violent 'resistance' to any expression of Jewish sovereignty in the land.
As a result, most Evangelical Christians distrust Palestinian intentions and therefore remain highly skeptical about the merits of a two-state solution at this time, as do a great many Israelis. We think Christians should be very cautious about urging our governments to push Israel prematurely into such risky and unworkable solutions.
At the same time, this does not mean we are "blocking" peace in the Middle East. The blame for that lies largely with the parties in the region themselves and primarily with militant Arab and Islamic elements that seek Israel's destruction.
It is our assessment that the Evangelicals writing to President Bush were nonetheless able to place Israel and the Palestinians on an equal footing because of two theological errors:
1) A failure to grasp the biblical paradox of 'free grace' versus 'divine election', and
2) Their adherence to the vestiges of a doctrine known as Replacement theology.
It is clear from the Bible that God indeed loves all men the same, whether Israelis, Palestinians or others. Yet it is equally true that God in His sovereignty calls and elects certain vessels for His eternal purposes. "Jacob I loved, Esau I hated", affirms Romans 9:13. Thus we understand that God established a unique relationship with Israel for the purpose of world redemption, and that relationship is enduring and has no equivalent whatsoever on the Palestinian side.
Yet many Christians to this day deny that Israel still stands in a special covenant relationship with God. Because it was the source of so much evil and hostility against the Jewish people down through Church history, many who cling to such Replacement thinking prefer the term “Fulfillment” theology – meaning that the coming of Christ and birth of the Church fulfilled all the promises that God made to ancient Israel. In either case, the result is the same – Israel is seen as having already completed her redemptive mission, leaving the modern state of Israel with no theological significance and she should be treated accordingly.
It is our belief, however, that God's covenants with Israel are as valid today as when He first swore two irrevocable and unconditional oaths to Abraham:
1) To 'bless' or redeem the world through his seed (Genesis 12:1-3), and
2) To deliver the Land of Canaan to Abraham's natural descendants as an "everlasting possession" (Genesis 17:8).
Thus both the people and the land of Israel were chosen for the purpose of world redemption, and to remove either one from the equation undermines the Abrahamic covenant, and by extension even our own salvation as New Testament believers. Why? Because according to the Apostles' teaching it would render God a liar and absolutely untrustworthy (see Romans 3:1-4; Hebrews 6:13-20).
Yet many Christians ignore or demean the land component of the Abrahamic Covenant, even though the Bible lays emphasis on it throughout its pages. For instance, when the Psalmist describes the covenant with Abraham, he stresses the land promise and its validity for "a thousand generations" (Psalm 105:8-12). Nothing in the New Testament abrogates or nullifies this land promise (see Romans 3:3; II Timothy 2:13; Galatians 3:15-17).
Now it is true that in the Mosaic covenant, God then comes along and places conditions on Israel's right to enjoy possession of that which they already own (Leviticus 26, Deuteronomy 28). Yet Israel's loss of domicile in the land has never meant her loss of underlying title to the land (Leviticus 26:44-46). Even the past 2000 years of exile is not a sign of Israel's ultimate rejection before God; rather God was simply keeping His side of the 'bargain' made at Sinai. Thus in Israel's exiles we see God's righteous and just character, but in Israel's returns we see His faithfulness and favour (Psalm 102:13).
In the end, Abraham was promised not only a ‘seed’ to bless the whole earth, but also the physical land of Israel as an ‘everlasting possession’. The Bible essentially tells us that the first coming of Messiah fulfilled the first promise (Galatians 3:16), while His Second Coming will ensure the latter.
In other words, Israel will one day finally enter into her promised rest and peace in the land. We believe this will have its ultimate fulfillment in the Messianic Age. Until then, we will not be advocating that an unredeemed Israel enter into her full land allotment. But neither will we be a part of any effort to force Israel to permanently divest herself from her land inheritance.
_____________________
Christians that Support a Palestinian State Miss the Biblical Picture
John R. Houk
© August 29, 2007
____________________
ICEJ News - is a free email service providing news and comment on Middle East affairs compiled by journalists at the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem and supported by donations from subscribers.
The International Christian Embassy Jerusalem stands at the forefront of a growing mainstream movement among Christians worldwide that support Israel based on biblical principles and promises.
For more about us, go to: http://www.icej.org/articles/about_us
For more information contact David Parsons, ICEJ Media Director at david.parsons@icej.org
Do you wish to know how pro-Arab career diplomats are at the State Department? Do you wish to know why the U.S. State Department has been a headache for implementing Bush Foreign Policy? It is all because the State Department is so pro-Arab that it looks the other way when American diplomats are murdered by Islamofascist terrorists.
Yasser Arafat was complicit in the murder of American diplomats when a PLO terrorist group (Black September) assassinated American diplomats in Sudan in the year 1973 because America did not cooperate in releasing terrorist prisoners in Israel and America.
Here is what is outrageous: The State Department then arranges peace talks on American soil that takes place in the White House and Camp David. How moronic is that? Arafat orders the death of Americans yet diplomacy is put forth rather than protection or eradicating an enemy.
It is the pro-Arab element in American bureaucracy that hinders the War on Terror.
