theway2k’s blog

A Schism over Shari'a in the Church of England

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:03:05 -0500

Dr. Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester

There are two Archbishops in Britain duking it out verbally in public over the affect of Mohammedanism in Britain.

Ironically Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams appears to be the appeasement minded head of the Anglican Church that is calling for a multiculturalism that accepts Mohammedan Sharia Law to compete or override the British rule of law as it applies to enforcement in Britain.

The Archbishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali by name is of Pakistani descent. Archbishop Nazir-Ali has been writing about how Mohammedanism is fracturing British society establishing in there are actually “no-go areas” for Brits in which the harshness of Sharia Law is exercised contrary to British Law.

Does America have this moronic appeasement to look forward to as Secular Humanists attempt to eradicate the influence of Christianity and accommodate the religion of Mohammedanism?

JRH 5/12/08

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Is it Time for a 28th Amendment?

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:04:45 -0500

Radical Islam Threatening

Hans Gruen has posted a proposed version of a fictional 28^th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The theme of Gruen’s Amendment is to declare Islam (I prefer Mohammedanism) NOT a religion and instead a political ideology.

Frankly I agree with Gruen’s assessment (particularly radical Islamism); however I fear the American public is not convinced Mohammedanism is more a political ideology than a religion.

One of Gruen’s commenters noted that a call for an Amendment to outlaw Mohammedanism has been thought upon already. There is even a petition going around the Internet to outlaw Mohammedanism. I am going to seek out and sign this petition; however I am fairly certain (at this point) that the lack of Jihad education in America will find this Amendment repugnant.

A grassroots movement in America needs to be started (something like Gabriel's - Act! For America - has began) to spread the word about the ideology of Mohammedanism as opposed to the religious practice of Mohammedanism.

I think a better possibility is to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage without establishing any particular Jewish sect (Orthodox, Conservative or Reformed) or Christian Denominations (Variations of Protestantism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox etc.) as a State religion.

This would simultaneously deal with Secular Humanism war on Christianity and radical Islam.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Mohammedanism Superior to UK Law of the Land

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:40:59 -0500

Islamic Supremacism 2

The Islamization of the United Kingdom has become evident. The UK is a Western Nation last time I looked at a map. That would mean the Judeo-Christian heritage is an influence on the land. O yeah, I just remembered. The Church of England is a State Church in the UK.

Well I just found this tidbit of information about a Mohammedan speeding in his automobile at more than twice the speeding limit which according to the Scottish part of the UK is illegal enough to have your Driver’s License revoked or so reports the Pirate’s Cove Blog.

The Scottish Judge was remarkably sympathetic to the Mohammedan’s plea to have the law of the land not apply to him. He is a good Mohammedan and has two wives that live in two different places. The pious Mohammedan, who surely prays to Mecca five times daily, needs his automobile to drive betwixt the two wives to fulfill his Mohammedan conjugal obligations.

So of course Scottish Justice should not take away the Mohammedan’s license to drive for serving the Mohammedan higher good is superior to the law of land and of course a endangering a kafir’s life is irrelevant to the superiority of Mohammedanism.

Evidently the Scottish Judge agreed. The Mohammedan kept his license and had to a 200 Pound Sterling fine. The fine was probably no problem because in Mohammedan law you are allowed up two four wives but only if you can afford to take care of the poor deluded ~~sex-slave~~ wives. Also the Scottish Judge overlooked the law in which polygamy is against the law.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

First-Temple Building Remains Found Near Temple Mt.

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:27:49 -0500

High Priest in Holy of Holies

Well it looks like the Waqf attempt to destroy any historical remains of the Jewish Temple underneath the Temple Mount has been foiled by the discovery of some remains of the First Temple built by Solomon son of David. Muslims historians have been spreading the lie that the Jewish Temple never existed to prop up their myth that Mohammed took off from a winged horse into the heavens on the site of the Temple Mount. Hello! Old Mo died before Mohammedans conquered Byzantine Christians at Jerusalem giving them the usual Mohammedan choice: Convert, become a person possessing no rights in remaining a Christian or die.

JRH 3/14/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Islam is Emerging as a State Religion

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:02:41 -0500

Tarek ibn Ziyad - Conqueror of Spain

In this day in America the Left and Secular Humanists will do their utmost to prevent Christian worship, prayer and symbolism out of Public Schools for the oft misperception of the term “Separation of Church and State.” That term is not found in the original U.S. Constitution nor in any Amendment to the Constitution and especially it is not found in the first ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights.

As you can probably deduce, I highly disagree with the Left’s extreme incursion in Public Schools and Public Institutions. I agree religion should not be promoted as Establishing a State Religion which is the only intent of the First Amendment; however to completely eradicate religion and especially the religion in which America has its heritage from is ridiculous. The Founding Fathers NEVER had any intent of preventing the principles and morals out of publicly funded institutions, they simply objected to establish any particular Christian Denomination as the State Church and they wanted Americans to have the freedom to believe as they see fit whether they were religious or atheistic or what ever.

Now that is my introductory rant on what I think the Left and Secular Humanism has done in attacking the efficacy of Christianity in Public Institutions.

Now let us get to the point. The Left and Secular Humanism is so intent on multiculturalism and anti-Christianity that they dispose of their own concepts of “Separation of Church and State” when it comes to funding a religion in Public Institutions foreign to America’s heritage. This is particularly true of the religiously politically correct moniker of the religion known as Islam (I prefer the 19^th century moniker for it is closer to the truth – Mohammedanism).

Mohammedanism is being taught in Public Schools to the extent that students are made to practice Mohammedan rituals in the name of multiculturalism. For example: the observing the Mohammedan religious holy days of Ramadan again under the guise of understanding and accepting another multicultural way of living. I don’t have a problem with understanding another culture, especially the Mohammedan culture. Americans need to understand the nature of how Mohammedanism grew into a significantly large religion and how intolerance forbids the free thought non-Mohammedan beliefs in Mohammedan culture.

HOWEVER teaching students rituals is like promoting its faith. This is the very thing the Left and Secular Humanism does not allow Christianity to do in Public Schools under their belief of the Separation of Church and State.

It gets worse! Now American tax payer money is actually paying for Arabic Culture schools for foreign children of Arabic descent or immigration complete with speaking in Arabic and Mohammedan prayer moments and a curriculum financed by Saudi interests which include the Wahhabi Sunni school of thought which is the radical Islam of Mohammedan terrorists like al Qaeda, the Taliban and Hamas – all listed terrorist organizations by the U.S. State Department.

The most controversial school of this nature is in New York – the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA). Daniel Pipes points out that teaching Arabic culture is a good thing; however the way Arabic curriculum is scheduled to be taught is in a way that glorifies Pan-Arab nationalism or in my interpretation – glorifies Mohammedanism as the supremacist religion of the planet and denigrates other cultures. Alicia Colon writing as a critic of the curriculum that the pro-KGIA people have accused critics of KGIA as being hate mongers and bigots. The pro-KGIA people point especially to Stop The Madrassa as a preeminent hate group however when Colon investigated the website she found nothing comparable to hate. It is a website critical of promoting Mohammedanism and skewing the academic truth on the American dime. In all this Colon wonders, “Where is the ACLU?” After all the ACLU is in the forefront organization keeping Christianity out Public Institutions and Public Schools is high on that ACLU list of persecution. Colon was also astounded that the pro-KGIA people were sending her HATE mail of the deviant quality that made anti-KGIA critics look like saints.

KGIA was so last year; however that Public Institution’s example is beginning to be set up in other parts of America.

The State of Minnesota is now funding the same kind of Arabic Public School and according to an Act For America e-newsletter I received recently may be even on a worse scale than the KGIA.

The Act For America e-newsletter points out that the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TIZA) is on the public dime for foreign Mohammedans too poor to attend the private Madrassa school in the same area yet are taught the same anti-American radical Islamic message.

And since I had to check a source, viz. the Stop The Madrassa blog; I have discovered that the blog has posted same article as Act For America did by Katherine Kersten of the Star Tribune (*Registration Required)which links Muslim American Society (MAS) with TIZA. Hello! The MAS has been linked to radical extremist terrorists and Islamists like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Islam Is What It Is

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:43:51 -0600

Essence of Islam - Smeagol or Gollum

President Bush termed Islam “the religion of peace” to tone down any American backlash after 9/11 toward Mohammedan-Americans and Mohammedans residing in America. The insinuation being that extremist people driven by an extremist ideology in the name of Islam is not the core values of Islam.

All President Bush succeeded in doing is to validate Islamist-American organizations that have sympathy with Mohammedan terrorist ideology. Thus when a non-Muslim begins to educate Americans on the reality of Islam, these Islamist-American organizations took on the moniker of “moderate” thanks to President Bush. The Islamist-American organizations could utilize free-speech to support terrorism openly while simultaneously secretly funding terrorists garnered as a Non-Profit Organization. Here CAIR, Holy Land Foundation, ISNA and others come to mind.

Britain is taking a more extreme cue about Mohammedanism in its midst. So as to not offend Britain’s rather large minority of practicing Mohammedanism, when acts of Islamist terrorism occur they are to be termed “Anti-Islamic Activity.”

What a crock of dhimmitude! In Britain as in America the forefront leadership of Mohammedanism is Islamist terrorist friendly. Not only should Westerners and Americans label Islamic terrorism as heinous acts derived from Wahhabi or Shia interpretation of their perceived holy words, we need to pump funding into people and Non-Profit Organizations committed to exposing the Islamic Agenda as it relates to Western Culture.

Mark Steyn is making that effort. Read his article “First they came for Piglet.” The article is all about America and the West burying its head in the sand while a foreign religion demands special privileges as a religion in a foreign land. This is a slow train to eradicating Western culture.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Contrasting Secular and Religious Terrorism

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:19:27 -0600

Terrorist religious ideology

A political scientist by the name of Robert Pape has proposed a thesis that terrorism is all the same in its motivation and has little to do with religion. The author of the monograph “Contrasting Secular and Religious Terrorism” – Jonathan Fine – demonstrates that Pape is way off base, particularly as it concerns Islamist/Jihad terrorism.

JRH 1/15/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Sharia Law Slipping into Western Banking?

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:53:09 -0600

Patrick M. Wood

What do you think about when you here the phrase “Global Banking”?

I am no econ or finance major; however off the top of my mind I think of American and European Banking calling the shots for banking standards and procedures.

There is the World Bank designed to aid poor nations with funds and loans for development. The World Bank headquarters is located in Washington, D.C.

The International Monetary Fund is another Western banking powerhouse that is highly involved in global development. The IMF central administrative city is also in Washington, D.C.

A fellow named Patrick Wood has written an essay on how the Mohammedan principles of Sharia Law banking is mutually (i.e. Western flirting and Mohammedan demanding) becoming infused as the new Global Banking principle.

Some would call that a conspiracy theory of the Mohammedan agenda of using soft measures (i.e. utilizing Western Rule of Law to manipulate a slow transformation of Mohammedan harsh principles) to incorporate Sharia Law into gradual Mohammedan domination of Western Society.

I lean toward Islamophobia so I tend to buy into such agendas coupled with the writings and speeches of radical Islamists of both the Sunni and Shi’ite variety.

Since I am merely a voice of opinion and an expert of little I rely on those who study such subjects as economics, finance and banking to grasp a little understanding. I am wholly convinced that Islamism today as Communism in the Twentieth Century is the greatest threat to American and Western Liberty and Freedom.

So let us pay attention to Patrick Wood as he writes about “Global Banks Adopting Islam.” READ IT!

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Rule of Law Under Islam

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:20:08 -0600

Islam for Dhimmis

If there is such a thing as Moderate Mohammedanism it is in only practiced in Western style democratic nations.

At the ccpga Yahoo Group there is a huge amount of citations of non-Islamist (ergo the opposite being moderate) Mohammedans experiencing judgments from the rule of law in various Middle Eastern nations.

The post begins with a Dhimmi Watch post about a Christian woman being thrown in the slammer in Egypt for stating her religion as Christianity on her Marriage Certificate.

Evidently her father converted from Christianity to Mohammedanism briefly then converted back to Christianity. That is illegal according to the law of the land in Egypt. The father’s brief flirtation with Mohammedanism made all his children (whether they wanted to or not) legally Mohammedans. Thus the Egyptian Christian according to the law of the land was a Mohammedan. She broke the law trying to marry as a Christian.

The ccpga Post goes on with comments about the Dhimmi Watch post some of them telling accounts of other enforcement of the rule of law in Egypt.

Now if this is justice in a moderate Mohammedan society imagine the ruthlessness of Islamism.

Now imagine that Islamism is the predominant force in America and the West seeking Mohammedan converts and supporting the biggest and the newest Mosques in America and the West.

Now I am a huge believer in America’s First Amendment right that implies Freedom of Religion or philosophical conscience; however if this is the kind of rule of law moderate Mohammedans expect to be practiced in America, I am for some religious profiling to make sure Islamist teaching is NOT a right and a test to make sure a moderate Mohammedan is moderate by American Constitutional rule of law.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

A Shot of Realism in the Bush Doctrine

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:02:41 -0600

Cain, or, Hitler in Hell. George Grosz 1944

Robert McMahon writing for the Council on Foreign Relations concludes in a recent article that the Bush Administration is modifying the Bush Doctrine. To act preemptively in international crisis is still stalwart; however the concept of exporting democratic principles is being modified. Not all cultures are amenable to receive Western style democracy when the culture is theocratic and anti-Western culturally.

This is the difficulty that has slowed American progress in Iraq (combined with utilizing political correctness as a viable option to schmooze the indigenous citizens). Thus the experience in Iraq and the current crisis existing in Pakistan – Islamists versus Mohammedan moderates (if there is such a thing) is effecting a modification of the Bush Doctrine.

That modification is a resurgence of Political Realism to a certain degree within the Bush Doctrine. Thus preemptive action to secure America’s National Interests still remains; however applying Political Realism as a measured viability in transforming a repressive regime into the infrastructure of democratic principles must weigh in to America’s National Interests. If democratic principles are rejected on a grass roots level of a culture in a nation then Political Realism options to ensure American National Interests and Security must be utilized.

The old adage power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely is a truism under a one man rule even if its initial inception was benevolent. In a Western Democratic Representative government that possesses immense power, the power is managed collectively via voters choosing elected officials to manage the power. The corruption aspect is more difficult to corrupt power when the infrastructure has the checks and balances of democratic principles.

Nonetheless America is a mega-super power globally which means there are regional mere super power nations that do not wish to deal with American hegemony. The principle super powers that attempt to derail American National Interests for whatever reasoned regional conflict with another National Interest are Russia, China and remarkably the collective of the European Union.

Regardless of accusations of Third World nations and Leftist influences of the mere super powers, American National Interests does not include imperialism. Imperialism implies conquest to rule foreign nations. America has never had an interest in neo-colonial imperialism since the twentieth century and very little of that thinking prior to the twentieth century. The closest America came to imperialism was the concept of Manifest Destiny, which acquired land from the east coast toward the west coast at the expense of Native Americans and Mexico.

The National Interests are the end goals of the USA. US strength gives the appearance of a global hegemony of American Empire. Since the USA has no interest in ruling other lands that is an erroneous perception. The USA has a National Interest in maintaining mega-power to meet outside security threats and the National Interest of maintaining global prosperity that affects the economy of America and the pursuit of happiness for American citizens.

The Bush Doctrine meets the parameters of America’s current National Interests. The use of preemptive military action that rocks the global boat and the exporting of an infrastructure of democratic principles which promote global coexistence are the central points of the Bush Doctrine.

Communism has been derailed as a repressive government in which democratic principles have been inculcated into a nation’s culture. That is the legacy of the Reagan Administration.

There is a new ideology threatening global peace and affecting the National Interests of America. Well new in the sense of twenty-first century, actually the ideology has been around since the seventh century. That is the terrorist principles of Theo-political Islamism or Islamofascism. Islamofascism is the fringe interpretation and enforcement of the Scriptures and Traditions related to the founder of Mohammedanism (Islam) – Mohammed. Mohammed was a cruel Arab that utilized delusional visions or manmade ideology in the wrappings of religion to carve out an empire and maintain the empire by forcing the conquered to Mohammedanism or become a sub-human in submission to the Theo-political ideology or die. This effectively maintained a platform to control large amounts of land providing wealth to the ruling elites that followed Mohammed’s demise. In Mohammedan lands this system is maintained to this day which has indoctrinated the Mohammedan follower of hateful intolerance of non-Mohammedans and cruel barbaric punishment to Mohammedans that break the cultic code. This harshness is particularly devastating toward women who do not even realize the cruelty until they become the victims breaking the medieval code (Sharia Law) wittingly or unwittingly.

Two things threaten global peace and thus include American National Interests:

1. The largest deposits of OIL that are extracted to be refined are in the Mohammedan controlled Middle East. Currently oil is the black gold energy source that powers the majority of what people use that need energy. The primary examples are automobiles, jets and military vehicles. Without refined oil the global economy could sink into a depression reminiscent of the Great Depression of the 1930’s. Western European nations and China are highly dependent on this oil. The politics of oil has influenced democratic Europeans to support Islamist causes. China has developed a huge market in military arms for oil with Middle Eastern nations; particularly rogue Islamofascist nations as Iran and Syria who in turn supply Islamofascist transnational terrorists as al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah and more.

2. The second threat on American National Interests is the growing influence of Islamist-American organizations that receive and send funding to foreign Islamist terrorists or supporters of terrorism (such as Saudi Arabian Wahhabism and Egyptian based Muslim Brotherhood). Currently this is a larger threat in Western Europe where secular humanism has created a huge vacuum in spiritual matters and the large populations of Mohammedans are actually filling that vacuum rather than the traditional Christian Church (Catholic or Protestant).

In America there seems to be a union of religious Islamism and non-religious Secular Humanist with the mutual goal of obliterating the foundations and morality of Christianity. Islamist-Americans and foreign Islamists are

infiltrating American Government and bureaucracy

to attain sensitive information and deliver it to Islamist terrorist enemies of America.

The Bush Doctrine and/or a modification of the Bush Doctrine must be maintained to combat a patient enemy lacking the technology for their ends yet willing to use the long term fear mongering of terrorism and the West’s democratic infrastructure against us as a means to an end.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend