7 posts tagged “mohammed”
Muhammad A. Khan (aka M.A. Khan) is the author of the very informative and well documented book entitled, “Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery.” The book leans toward the pedantic and there are a few English language grammatical errors; however Islamic Jihad is so incredibly documented that it was leaves little room to criticize the book for the accuracy of the Islamic exposé. So do not tackle this book for reading enjoyment, rather engulf the book to educate your self on the actual nature of Islam’s past to understand its present and predict its future.
Khan is also the administrator of an awesome source website about Islam and its not so peaceful nature at Islam Watch. This website bills itself as “Telling the truth about Islam” and “Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims”.
Consider this an introduction to an essay by M.A. Khan I found on Faith Freedom International. The essay is entitled, “The Journey of a Pakistani from a Muslim to an Ex-Muslim”.
The essay is a bit of mixture of M.A. Khan biography and associated insights into Islam. It is an awesome read!
JRH 6/24/09
The Leftists of the West have long lamented the poor Mohammedans suffering in the Land of Israel or blamed for poverty of Western exploitation from the past. The Mohammedan whine is that of a victim that is owed a reimbursement for their societal ills which must be the result of Western oppression. I am certain that most of the blame for that oppression is wrapped up into a package with the United States of America as the address. The blame towards America is remarkable since there was no involvement by the USA in colonial adventurism as accomplished by the Europeans.
The Leftist or Mohammedan will say, “Yeah but … What about American corporations taking advantage of the poor Mohammedan populace?” Here is another question: Was American capitalism as exploitive of Middle Eastern Mohammedans as Mohammedan imperialist expansion of the past? I do not think so.
Middle Eastern leadership sold out their constituents for self-serving oil profits or for weapons to harass either Israel or America or both. Then the mostly authoritarian Mohammedan regimes either directly blame America and Israel or allow their clerics to sow seeds of hate to Americans and Jews.
So get over the self-deprecating victimhood of the so-called religion of peace. From the time that old Mohammed used a religion borrowed on the backs of Judaism and Christianity as a tool to create an army from backward Arabs to conquer the world. The tool became the glue that exacted discipline and the promise of carnal pleasures in this life and the next for adhering to the imagination of Mohammed.
The Left and Mohammedans go to great lengths to point to the savagery of the Christian Crusades. Yet the Crusader savagery was contrary to the Christian Scriptures. Also much of the Crusader savagery can be attributed to hundreds of years of Mohammedan brutal imperialism as the tool of religion was utilized to keep the militarization of Mohammedan peoples. The end game of Mohammedan imperialism was to instill the Theo-political cult into conquered peoples who often converted to Mohammedanism to avoid brutality or death.
Thus brutalized people became brutalizing people ready to practice the Theo-political cult to spread Mohammedanism as an all consuming blight upon the earth.
The poor victimized Mohammedans of the Middle East are looking back to the past of imperialistic conquest and persecute non-Mohammedans in ever increasing cruelty in the late 20th Century and early 21st Century. This travesty has particularly affected Christians in the Middle East that have resulted and results in harsh persecution and maiming deaths.
David Horowitz has founded David Horowitz Freedom Center to expose this reality of the violence inherent in Islam/Mohammedanism. In a recent email from the Freedom Center focuses on the plight of Christians in the Middle East. The Christian fate in the Middle East is not a pretty one. Indeed, the email has a link to a slide show which is extremely graphic of the atrocities committed in the name of Mohammedanism in the Middle East. Be forewarned that you will view extremely disturbing pictures as the slide show progresses.
JRH 5/15/09
******************************
Horowitz Request for Financial Support
David Horowitz
Email sent: May 13, 2009
Dear Freedom Center Supporter,
Over the past few decades there has been a systematic and brutal campaign being leveled at the world's Christian community. This has been happening in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. As disparate as these regions are, the common thread in all of these cases of persecution is that the perpetrators are Muslims. The Muslim persecution of Christians has reached Genocidal proportions.
It is an issue that no one wants to discuss. The level of international attention given to this issue is deafeningly quiet. No outcry, marches, protests, no speeches on the floor of Congress, no speeches at the United Nations. There are no major Hollywood productions and no Tibet-like bumper stickers.
Millions of Christians have been put to death for the sole reason that they are Christian. All of these deaths have been at the hands of Muslims, who kill the "infidel" in the name of their prophet Muhammad.
The time for silence at this Genocidal persecution of Christians is over. The Freedom Center has written pamphlets and numerous articles on this issue, screened an exceptional movie by Pierre Rehov and brought speakers on the campuses of America to shine a light on these atrocities.
Now, the Center is releasing another in its series of flash videos to show in striking reality, the plight of the world's Christians and to explain the threat they face. Our flash videos have been viewed by millions, from students to activists, the media and public officials.
This flash video, The Muslim Persecution of Christians is a vital tool that can be used to spread the truth and expose the nature of Islam and the threat it poses to all peoples of the world and in this case specifically, the plight of the Christians. The once vibrant Christian communities of the Middle and North Africa are disappearing before our eyes.
It is vital that not only Americans, but the whole world see what is happening. In order for us to have this flash video reach the millions that is necessary for it to have a full impact, we need to raise $55,000 over the month. Those funds will be used to secure targeted lists, post ads on websites, campus newspaper ads, radio spots and mailings.
We hope you can help us today by following this link to give $25 or more. This donation will go a long way in helping us reach our goal and bringing the plight of millions of Christians into the light. Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
David Horowitz
President & Founder
I am not the most respectful person when it comes to intolerant Mohammedanism. I can see how my anti-jihad stand could offend everyday Muslims that are just living their lives awaiting whatever expectation a Muslim (devout or marginal) is waiting for.
On the other hand I really try not to seek out and personally attack Muslim individuals for their beliefs. I try to stick to the facts as best as I know them from the religious documents considered holy by Muslims and by those who have an academic understanding of said documents who are definitely NOT pro-Mohammedan.
Then there is Ali Sina of Faith Freedom International (FFI). I like Ali Sina however this guy makes no bones about going to the heart of the matter which he has to know will rile up Mohammedans into a state of frenzy. I might point out that Ali Sina probably would be very critical of me for I am a devout Christian Right kind of guy. That means other Christians, atheists and most likely Mohammedans in particular would find uncomplimentary things to say about my beliefs.
Now I cannot state with any certainty but I get the impression that Ali Sina rejects all forms of religion that might crimp the Secular Humanist view of civil rights. I also know that Ali Sina is an ex-Muslim hence he has reserved much of his venom for exposing Mohammedanism and its founder to harsh critical conclusions (which I happen to agree with).
To see what I am writing about you need to read FFI post Ali Sina entitled “Why Diss Islam?”
JRH 3/16/09
On one of my community blogs I posted a link to JudgeRight writing about Legalized Pedophilia in Islam. A commenter on my blog that linked to JudgeRight’s expose of Islamic pedophilia responded with this: “This is Mohammad.. Click here” Now the “Click here” link is a short video about praising Mohammed from Leftists, Theosophists and the prince of religious tolerance - Gandhi. The "Mohammed" endorsement is from people who are generally anti-Christian, anti-Semitic and anti-Western values (Shaw); New Agers that pick bits and pieces of favored religions with an emphasis on Eastern Mysticism (Besant); and of course Gandhi who has nice things to say about Jesus Christ and even alluded that he would be a Christian if it were not for the example of those that don't practice the Christianity of their Bible. Gosh if Gandhi was cognizant of the atrocities of Mohammed, there would be little praise from him. Of course the quote you used was from a "young" Gandhi. Here is a better truth about Mohammed. (Hurry, catch the link while you can. YouTube is in the dhimmitude tank and will probably remove the truth about Mohammed!)
Islam Watch is one of those websites a non-Mohammedan can go to receive an understanding of the theo-political teachings of Mohammedanism (better known as Islam).
More and more anti-jihadists and anti-Islamists are beginning to sway to the opinion that Mohammedanism is a religion that is more political and militaristic in ideology than a personal faith in which a human seeks peace with a personal God.
I myself waver back and forth on this opinion because (finally) there are a few Muslims that are eschewing the murderous, lack of rights and intolerance that are indeed inherent in the Mohammedan holy scriptures.
There is a small group of Muslims that have a blog (MuslimsAgainstSharia) with a home site with the same name but a different URL (http://www.reformislam.org/).
Now I am not endorsing a reformed Islam as a faith for I am a devout Charismatic/Pentecostal; however I am also an American. As an American I do believe in freedom of Religion. I wonder how a reformed peaceful Islam would stand against a missionary Christian. I suspect without the threat of violence for becoming an Islamic apostate, the religion of Islam would shrink. Of course that is my Christian opinion. A reformed Mohammedan certainly would have a different opinion.
Nonetheless, without reform Mohammedanism is a deadly theo-political cult bent on intolerant subjection of the globe and the termination of Freedom and Liberty.
Thus you need to read this Islam Watch essay entitled “Why Allah is not God?”
JRH 8/12/08
Rachel’s Law (Libel Terrorism Protection Act) became the Law of the land in the State of New York. The Law was named after Rachel Ehrenfeld who was persecuted in a foreign civil suit (Britain) by Saudi Arabian billionaire Islamist Khalid Salim Bin Mahfouz. The reason Bin Mahfouz brought the civil suit is because Ehrenfeld’s book “Funding Evil” mentioned his name as one of the conduits that finance transnational terrorist organizations.
Evidently the Islamofascist did not want to be exposed in the English reading West because bin Mahfouz was determined to sue Ehrenfeld. “Funding Evil” was (at the time anyway) was only published in America. This was significant because for bin Mahfouz to sue Ehrenfeld in America he would he have to prove Ehrenfeld libeled him. Which of course he could not and also an American civil suit would expose his billionaire finances to American scrutiny as his lawyers would have to provide discovery documents that would probably open more doors to funding terrorist activities.
So bin Mahfouz sued Ehrenfeld in Britain. “Funding Evil” was never published there however bin Mahfouz used the pretext a few copies of the book had been purchased by the Internet in Britain.
Why did the Islamofascist sue Ehrenfeld (an American citizen) in Britain where “Funding Evil” was never published? In British (and probably European) Courts the burden of proof is upon the accused instead of the accuser.
Thus literally Ehrenfeld (not a millionaire) would have to come up with travelling expenses and foreign legal fees to battle Islamofascist billionaire bin Mahfouz in the British Courts. Ehrenfeld chose to not even show up in Britain.
The dhimmi British Judge proceeded to award Islamofascist bin Mahfouz a lucrative financial decision in Ehrenfeld’s absence.
This libel decision in British Courts which was one of many began to get the attention of Publishers in America. They became concerned they also may be held accountable in civil court in foreign lands. Bin Mahfouz and other Islamofascists effectively shut down free speech in America. American Publishers were refusing to publish any books exposing Islamofascist terrorism which also would tap into the livelihood of American and foreign writers that published in American Publishing Houses.
Ehrenfeld fought back in America. First she used the New York State Courts; however they told her the State Courts had no jurisdiction on foreign Courts. Then Ehrenfeld lobbied in New York’s State Assembly. The Assembly protected Ehrenfeld and other writers from Libel terrorism by passing Rachel’s Law.
As you might guess Rachel’s Law is only effective for Publishing Houses in the State of New York. Thank God Representative Peter King introduced the Federal version of Rachel’s Law with the appellation of Free Speech Protection Act. Unfortunately the Federal Rachel’s Law is not law yet.
I say “unfortunate” because Random House has cancelled the publication of a book by Sherry Jones about the sexual habits of Mohammed and his child bride Aisha (married at six years old). A college Professor spread the information to Islamofascist radicals who commenced to threaten Random House. Random House has capitulated cancelling publication and the imminent book tour Jones was preparing to publicize her book.
This is shameful of Random House especially since the publishing house is centered in New York, the bastion of anti-libel terrorism which enacted Rachel’s Law.
The scenario I am seeing is this: A Left Wing Professor deluded into supporting Islamism made the Islamists aware of the imminent publication of Sherry Jones’ book. I can’t believe a civil suit scared Random House off because of their location. Ergo a combination of the Islamic victimhood card and probably the threat of violence terrorized Random House from proceeding with publishing Jones’ book. Did you catch that? The self-proclaimed largest English language publishing house was terrorized into dropping the publication of a book critical of Islam.
Americans can criticize Leftists, Conservatives, Christians, Fringe Right Wing Groups (KKK, Aryan Nation et al), and Jews or just about anything EXCEPT Islam.
Thus freedom of speech is again being threatened by Islam. Warner Todd Huston has the story and the details – READ IT.
JRH 8/7/08
Did you know there was a group of Wahhabi Islamists that attempted to rip control of the “Great Mosque” in Mecca on November 20, 1979? The leader was a Sunni Wahhabi by the name of Juhayman al Uteybi.
Uteybi was no relation to the Saudi Royal Family. Apparently this is significant because the Saudi Royal Family of the time was attempting to liberalize the Saudi nation at the time and this Uteybi seizure of the “Great Mosque” was a Wahhabi response to the Saudi liberalization.
Let’s see, I was exactly 23 at the time. I have to be honest with you I have absolutely no recollection of that event in history. Do you?
Apparently it struck fear in the Saudi Royal Family who is supposed to be the modern protector of the Mohammedan holy city of Mecca. This Uteybi guy was so successful in seizing Mecca that the Saudi military needed help to re-take the “Great Mosque” in Mecca.
I became aware of all this through the posting of Mark A. Taylor of the ccpga Yahoo Group who discovered a book review by Thomas Lippman of a book entitled The Siege Of Mecca: The Forgotten Uprising in Islam's Holiest Shrine and the Birth of Al Qaeda, by Yaroslav Trofimov.
To get a time frame in your mind Lippman points out this is a year in history that a whole lot of events of notoriety occurred:
That year began with the Iranian revolution and ended with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. In between, Egypt signed a peace treaty with Israel, radicalizing the Palestinians. Saddam Hussein took power in Iraq. And the former prime minister of Pakistan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, was hanged by the general who overthrew him, Mohammed Zia ul-Haq - the leader who would turn the struggle against the Soviets in Afghanistan into a religious war that inspired zealots such as Osama bin Laden.
Here is the thing; I remember every one of the above events of history. I do not recall the siege of Mecca. There is a good reason for this.
This was humiliating for the Saudis. The Saudis asked for foreign help but not from any MUSLIM NATIONS. Indeed Jordan offered to help but the Saudis refused Jordanian help. Lippman’s book review does not go into why Jordan’s offer was refused but I can guess. The Hashemite family had been protectors of Mecca but the first Saudi king wrested the honor away from the Hashemites. The Hashemite Royal Family of Jordan claims direct descent from the founder of Mohammedanism – Mohammed. I am uncertain of the details but there has been a loose rivalry ever since.
The foreign help that came were in the guise of French Commandos who eventually entered the city forbidden to non-Muslims and gained victory. Saudi officials have refused to discuss the event in their history for years.
It was from the ashes of this “Great Mosque” siege that was broken by a non-Muslim nation that the Saudi Royal Family began to re-adopt the harsh Wahhabi ways and forsaking any thought of liberalizing Saudi society.
Lippman says the author Trofimov implies that an already breeding radical Islamism became a global radical Islamic starting point for massive transnational terrorist movements like Usama bin Laden’s al Qaeda.
I believe I have to get this book.
