6 posts tagged “mahmoud ahmadinejad”
Moshe Sharon writes that has Israel has only shot at Iran. Success is vital in a surgical strike for if it fails utterly or beyond expectations, Iran and its proxies could deliver a blow that could end Israel’s existence.
Personally I think success or failure is irrelevant. A surgical strike on Iran’s nuke capability may make the world safer from radiation fall-out; however Iran and it military surrogates are going to respond anyway. I suspect America’s aid might be the only thing to tip Israel’s defense to a favorable outcome.
Does that mean Israel should abandon a surgical strike against Iran because the stakes would be inevitable?
I say no!
Sharon also points out that the Mullah controlled Shi’ites of Iran and Ahmadinejad’s belief in Mohammedan destiny means Iran will attack Israel eventually. Sharon quotes a Mohammedan Hadith (which the Sunnis also preach) that is prevalent clerical sermons:
The last hour will not come unless the Muslims fight against the Jews, and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and the stone or the tree would say: "Muslim! Servant of Allah! Here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him!"
Coupling this Mohammedan race hatred of Jews and a military desire to rebuild the ancient Iranian hegemony in the Middle East probably means Israel will be the inevitable focus for a reason to begin a war. Thus Israel may be faced with fighting a conventional war or a nuke war. Israel could lose both with undoubted Israeli defensive damage to the Mohammedan world; however a conventional war might be Israel’s best chance to survive.
Sharon points out effectively that Iran or any other aggressors might be stung pretty badly by an Israeli strike; however the little sliver of a land known as Israel could be devastated off the map. Thus Sharon points outs Israel only has one shot.
JRH 7/18/08 (Hat tip Prophecy Update)
Read Caroline Glick on the UNBELIEVABLE APPEASEMENT of the EU to give everything to Islamofascist Iran and Syria as a dhimmi bribe. In return both Iran and Syria slaps the EU in the face (and by association also the U.N. Security Council) by saying NO when they offered even the kitchen sink.
Well Chavez’s bellicose move to the Venezuela/Columbia border was not merely because Columbia crossed the Ecuador/Columbia border to bring justice to FARC’s second in command Raul Reyes. It turns out the Columbian military acquired more than the justice of bringing down a Marxist committed to bringing down democracy of Columbia. Columbia discovered a laptop that contained damning evidence of Chavez doing business with FARC in drugs and weapons grade Uranium.
The laptop is the smoking gun that the USA-Columbia joint efforts to battle drug cartels (of which hypocrite Communist FARC is a member) was cutting into Chavez’s bottom line in the illegal drug business.
There is more: Chavez is a staunch ally with President Ahmadinejad of rogue nation Iran who has been recently exposed as working on weapons grade uranium (regardless of the NIE Report).
So we have the international exchange of money between NARC and Hugo Chavez. We also have Chavez being the middle man in providing weapons grade Uranium to NARC.
Gosh, I wonder where the uranium came from.
JRH 3/5/o8
When will the West wise up and understand that its thirst for oil is not a valid reason to allow a regionally influential leader as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to remain in power. The West has to at least wake up about Ahmadinejad’s pursuit of nuclear power which regardless of the Bush hating NIE Report is obviously pursuing a geopolitical strategy to attack in person or by proxy the Land Israel.
How can I say this? How can I measure such a conclusion? Astoundingly I can come to this conclusion by the very Islamofascist mouth of President Ahmadinejad of Iran.
Ahmadinejad made his latest statements in a speech given in the southern Iranian town of Bushehr, where Iran’s first light-water nuclear reactor is being built by Russia. The speech was broadcast live on Iran’s state-run television. He addressed world nations, advising them to "abandon the filthy Zionist entity which has reached the end of the line."
MORE:
"[Israel] has lost its reason to exist and will sooner or later fall. The ones who still support the criminal Zionists should know that the occupiers' days are numbered…Accept that the life of the Zionists will sooner or later come to an end."
Ahmadinejad said that the “final chapter” has begun in which the Arabs of Israel, together with “regional nations” will confront Israel and bring about “Palestine.”
Hello! Is this a nation or a leader of a nation that the world wants to allow to possess nuclear power that can easily be turned into a weapon horrific devastation upon neighbors which do not agree with Iranian Mohammedan apocalyptic-political scenarios to usher in the return of their cult mythos Mahdi?
Is there any sanity for America, the EU, Russia, China and India (Nuclear powers all) to all such a thing to happen? Is there even a slice of sanity to think that the sliver of a nation known as Israel should wait until Iran possesses nuclear warheads on missiles that are more than capable of reaching the Jewish State to make good on Ahmadinejad’s defecating mouth?
Dear God in Heaven or even dear Marxist Proletarian of the Sino World or the secular but mostly Hindu Indian sub-continent or even the pride of the Russian bear: Someone explain to me how such a person can remain in power in light of Europe’s attempt to exterminate Jews under the similar rhetoric of Adolf Hitler leader of Nazi Germany and a messianic believer of the Aryan race exporting the Nazi cult globally.
I mean, am I missing something here? Is the world to be mired in the mud of Appeasement until a nuclear weapon detonates wiping out millions of Jews in a heartbeat before a unified action is taken against Ahmadinejad?
Come on world awaken from the slumber of status quo and take care of business now and spank Ahmadinejad.
Amazing! The New York Times writes of Ahmadinejad as if he were a heroic Mohammedan standing bravely and defiantly in the midst of his detractors. You have to read way down in the article that Bollinger asked strong questions and even then portrayed Ahmadinejad’s response was a frozen smile. The NYT spun the facts and made Ahmadinejad look like the good guy for his beliefs and hypocritical criticisms of Israel and the West.
Ahmadinejad says Israel does not have a right to exist because it is racist State, yet the NYT fails to report Shia and Sunni Mohammedan exploitation of non-Mohammedan peoples living within the Middle East.
The NYT gives emphasis to Ahmadinejad’s comments about American possessing “fifth generation atomic bombs” while America wishes to prevent Iran or “other people who just want nuclear power”. What a bunch of Mohammedan crap! Everyone knows that the grade of uranium Iran is producing is way beyond peaceful commercial usage of nuclear power, indeed it is weapons grade uranium. And everyone knows that combining the technology of long range missile with weapons grade uranium is a given for production.
The NYT is skewing the news to the Left when they had an opportunity to both make Ahmadinejad look like the murderous freak that he is and praising Slanted Left Columbia President Bollinger with questions that would or should make a Slanted Right person happy.
Ahmadinejad squirmed way more than portraying defiance.
The Blogger “Vanderleun” of American Digest weighs in on all the talk about Ahmadinejad being invited and speaking at Columbia University.
Vanderleun says he was against before he was for it.
Just kidding! Really, no “seriously” is a better word.
The Conservative Blogs (of which I am a part of by association) skewered Columbia University’s President Bollinger for inviting and giving Ahmadinejad a forum to validate the extreme radical Shia/political Mohammedanism of which the Iranian President represents.
Although I never blogged on the issue, I did read plenty who did. And I have to admit I joined in the realm of outrage and agreed with the criticism Bollinger was receiving. I even came close to signing an Internet petition to vent my displeasure over Ahmadinejad’s appointment on American soil by invitation of an esteemed Ivy League Academic institution known as Columbia University.
Unlike Vanderleun, I did not watch the whole affair feeling it would accomplish little.
However if Vanderleun is correct (I have not corroborating reports as yet), Bollinger was the victim (at least in this case) of judgment before actual assessment.
Apparently Bollinger asked some to the point precise questions that answers would demonstrate the true nature to Americans of Ahmadinejad’s way of thinking.
Here is Vanderleun’s blog post:
