Eagle & Lady Liberty

Here is the attitude of most American Patriots serving our nation in Iraq and Afghanistan. Compare it with the Leftists.

Made and Posted on Youtube by Lewismadmax

Lewismadmax's words below:

"He is there, he knows, I share it with you now, please get a kleenex, if you don't need one......you have no soul!

 

BTW: Vic was killed in a roadside bomb last July, his real name was Mike.

 

God bless a country that made him hide."

I would say "God have mercy on a country that made him hide his identity.

Hat tip to Humbled Infidel.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Dem Dream Team

What does change mean to Barack Hussein Obama? It means accelerating Slanted Left social engineering internally and sticking their head in the sand externally. Think of how much worse it could be if Hillary succeeds in talking her despised fellow Democrat into the “dream ticket” run for the White House in 2008.

The extreme Black Power Leftist politically married to only a slightly less minuscular Lefty in Hillary would perpetuate and increase the social engineering in America in such things as a Christian Minister preaching from the Bible that homosexuality is sin would be a bigoted hate crime.

GW has sought out Arab consensus against Iran as a last choice to confront a nuking Iran because the Leftists or anti-American governments do not have the cajones to face oil rich and radical Islamic terrorist Iran. Obama’s world view would make negotiating with rogues, murdering terrorists and exporters of Islamist hatred his primary choice rather than the last choice. Obama would be in agreement of appeasement with Leftists in Europe and America. Gosh! Does it sound like Neville Chamberlain at the Munich Accords making a deal with a devil that had no intention whatsoever to keep the Accords? Kind of sounds like Ahmadinejad and Iran diplomacy stalling for more and more time to reach some kind of appalling goal – WMD. Indeed deception or the impossible “all or nothing” attitude seems to the primary negotiation tool of most of the Islamic Middle East. Does Obama believe he can make a deal with Islamist liars?

David Limbaugh has written a column that the McCain is boning up on the character and the friendships of Barack Hussein Obama to allow the real Obama to be seen by the American public before they make a choice for President in November 2008. Limbaugh has some excellent insight on the real Obama – YOU should read it.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Judicial Activism

The blog Judge Right over at Vox has an awesome post as to why Americans should vote Republican or if you are a dyed in the wool Dem (have mercy on your soul), a good reason NOT to vote for the extreme Left of the Democratic Party. It is the extreme Left that now controls the Democratic Party, it is a far cry from the balanced Democratic Party of deceased Senator Scoop Jackson (Scoop as it relates to McCain) that represent the centrist to slanted right of the Dems for a quarter century.

Voting Conservative or Republican means you understand the implications as to why Islamism (especially in its terrorist form) must be defeated AND you understand that the U.S. Judicial System dominated by Leftist activist judges are legislating law from the bench in most cases mystically fabricating judgments and precedents from Constitutional Law that do not exist.

Read how Judge Right demonstrates how the California Supreme Court has over turned the will of the people by a mere 4 to 3 vote: READ IT!

JRH 5/19/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Gen. David Patraeus

Bradley A. Blakeman of Freedomswatch.org has sent out an email exposing the defeatism of the Left and the Democrats in particular. The left are garnering forces to attempt to discredit General Patraeus in his second report to Congress on the progress on the War in Iraq.

Remember Moveon.org’s treasonous and malicious full page ad ran in the New York Times? The infamous “General Betrayus” was utilized.

Here is the email Blakeman sent out:

JRH 4/8/08

*************************

Stand With General Patraeus

Bradley A. Blakeman

Freedomswatch.org Email

April 7, 2008 9:59:37 PM

Dear John,

General Petraeus is delivering his second report on progress in Iraq to Congress this week, and once again those in Washington opposed to the war are pre-empting his report with defeatist nonsense.

Democratic Senators Chris Dodd, John Kerry, Jack Reed, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have decried the lack of political progress and called it a sign of "failure." Apparently they're unaware of the Iraqi government's passage of key legislation, including a vital de-baathification law, oil revenue sharing provisions, a national budget, and granting limited amnesty to thousands of detainees.

Now, a new group of liberals wants to get in on the act, setting up a new coalition called "The Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq" - but their plan is anything but responsible.

It calls for an end to all military action in Iraq, and instead encourages the U.S. to end the conflict using "diplomatic, political, and economic power." There's a word for this strategy: surrender.

When General Petraeus was in town last year, Hillary Clinton said his claims of progress required a "willing suspension of disbelief." If anything requires a suspension of disbelief it is the notion that Islamic extremists, suicide bombers, and dead-end insurgents will lay down their arms if we just leave - a strategy so naïve only a liberal could believe it.

Call your member of Congress today. Tell them the only responsible plan to ending the War in Iraq is through victory. A good first step toward that goal is for Congress to listen to the advice of the military commanders on the ground - qualified and capable men like General David Petraeus.

Your friend,

Bradley A. Blakeman
President and CEO

_________________________

Paid for by Freedom's Watch
info@freedomswatch.org
Copyright (c) 2008

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Moral Exhibition of the Left 1 DT Devareaux

I operate many blogs, some of a social nature and a few are just blogs for anyone to show up. My pet blog is SlantRight.com. My son has purchased the rights to the name and operates it on his servers for me for free. It is the Dad discount.

I rarely spread comments from one blog to the others; however I received a comment from “More Democrat ‘aid and comfort’ to the enemy” on my Mindsay blog which is more of a social blog. The comment was made by a person that goes by the moniker of Moralnihilist. Moralnihilist said little but it irked me a lot. So I am sharing my distinct charm around in my reply.

Moralnihilist said:

The purpose of the Iraq war was to line the pockets of George W Bush's oil buddies, nothing more.  There were no weapons of mass destruction.  Iraq was no threat. ...

We've already spent 10 times what we spent in Vietnam, and the cost in lives has been tragic.

I guess Ann Coulter is correct: Liberals Lie!

The Dems and Bush reacted to the same Intelligence of the time. Even President Clinton understood that Saddam Hussein was dangerous but did not have the cajones to do what GW did. Clinton's awareness of Iraq and transnational terrorists may never be completely known because the treasonous Dem used his security clearance to destroy classified material related to Clinton.

Whether or not the validity of WMD in Iraq is actual or mystified is irrelevant. The fact remains Hussein has shown in the past no hesitation to attack his neighbors for hegemonic gain and profit (with Iran the US aided him and with Kuwait we were against him). This is not to mention the brutality that Hussein and his psycho-sons inflicted on Iraqi citizens. Even now in 2008 mass graves of slaughtered men, women and children are haphazardly stumbled upon.

The only reason the U.S. does not send a military force to remove the butchering Arab Muslims from Sudan is the Islamic world would wrongly perceive it as an attack on Islam. Western nations even with the potential of their combined power to remove the current Sudanese government fear the Islamic reaction (The West is dominated by Left Wing cowering dhimmis). The genocide against Black Muslims in Darfur and Black Christians in Southern Sudan is enough reason to take out the regime. It is a demonstration of dhimmification of the U.N. and the protection of Communist Chinese that such action is not even close to being a consideration.

As far as oil goes: duh!! Are you an American or a dimwitted American? Islamists (though a growing minority in the Middle East) run the perceptions of America. If Islamists control oil in Iraq as well as oil in Iran and the Saudi Monarchy is a sneeze away from joining the Shah of Iran's fate. How do you think the National Interests of America would be affected if Islamists controlled the life blood of the World's economy? Can you say convert or no oil? That would mess up the Dems utopian delusional vision on how we should respect what happens in another nation's internal affairs.

As for the Iraq and Vietnam comparisons, the only thing valid that you have asserted is the unpopularity (forged into the minds by a Leftist MSM ignoring other facts and the Dems exploiting the non-reported facts) of the Iraq War in America.

So in essence Moralnilhilist, you are full of manure. I leave it to you decide what kind.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Obama-Surrender U.S.

I have found a couple of posts and an email I received Redstate.com that report different angles of Barack Hussein Obama as a liar. I am going to post all three.

I will start with the email from the e-list that I am on than post sequentially the posts about Obama.

Since most of the Democratic elite seems to be pushing for Hillary to abandon her campaign (which she refuses so far), voters should be made aware of the character of the man who would be President.

Even if the lies are mere honest faux pas it points to the inexperience Obama would bring to the Oval Office.

You know I have been anti-Clinton not just Hillary because the family has a shroud of deception that covers it. I guess that is something that does not bother Democrats. I am reading that Obama has that same shroud of deception. I guess if you are a Leftist and have a charismatic presence, being a strait shooter is a matter of insignificance. (No I wasn’t writing of the current Vice President. Okay, it was a humorous thought that popped into the moment.)

JRH 4/1/08

******************************************

Remember the Time Line

Redstate.com Email

Erick Erickson

March 31, 2008 9:01:38 AM

Dear RedState Reader,

This whole story about Reverend Wright further demonstrates the fraud that is Barack Obama. Let's work the timeline on this:

Barack claims that he would have left the church in 2007 if Wright had not stepped down as an "active" pastor. (Note that he is still "senior" pastor and all sermons in the churrch bulletin are still copyright to Wright)

Of course in 2006, Barack gave his largest donation to the church ever, $22,500. That's 22,500 demonstrations of his support for the message and work of Rev. Wright when Barack would have us believe that he was struggling with Wright's words and leadership.

Of course, recall that when the Wright story broke Barack hadn't heard about these sermons. They didn't happen when he was there.

Let me offer another theory: we are watching a politician lie. Politicially, it is a convenient lie, because he is lying about his state of mind, something that it is very hard to disprove or corroborate.

This is the same kind of lie that Barack Obama told about his position on Israel. He used to support a radical liberal position on Israel, like the position taught be Rev. Wright. But then, in 2003 he pivots and suddenly becomes a fan of Israel. Why? When politicians change their position a year before an election, the most obvious theory is usually the correct one. They are, or were, lying.

On Israel and on Wright, Obama's stories don't work.  And that is not the sort of change we can believe in.

All the best,

Erick Erickson
Editor, RedState.com

This email was sent to theway2k@yahoo.com because this address is on the RedState Action Emails list.

________________________________

Barack Obama: I'm Lying To You For Votes And You're Too Stupid To Know Any Better

Pretend my people NEVER said we should not hope for a democratic Iraq

By haystack

April 1, 2008

Redstate.com

This "100 year war" tug of war foolishness between Obama and McCain has gone far enough. Barack Obama is lying staight-faced to his followers, and he knows it. His Campaign Co-Chair is on record stating categorically that Iraq is "just the first of our Middle East occupations":

Look. We've been in Europe now since '45. We've been in Japan since '45. Been in Korea since '50. So we've had a European occupation force and a Asiatic occupation force for half a century, and we haven't had a Middle East occupation force, so this is a start of that, this is the way great powers operate, it's the way Rome operated. We will be in the Middle East for a long time. This is just the first of our Middle East occupations.

Barack Obama would have you believe that our being in Iraq is a bad thing. He is against war...well, war in Iraq... but has no problem expanding it in Afghanistan. According to a piece in the WSJ today:

Mr. Obama's call to increase the size of U.S. ground forces by 92,000 troops -- 65,000 for the Army and 27,000 for the Marines -- is precisely the figure offered by Secretary of Defense Bob Gates in 2007.

Fine. He wants to send 92,000 US Soldiers to Afghanistan to beat up an already "badly broken" Taliban, and rummage through caves looking for a couple old guys with cell phones and laptops running the war on terror. Whatever.

That he wants NO soldiers in the streets of Iraq to provide the necessary security and support for Iraqi citizens to conduct business, feed and clothe their families, and educate themselves escapes me, but even THIS is beside the point.

Obama's people are saying the same thing McCain is saying about Iraq...AND the greater Middle East. They are correct in suggesting we will continue exerting our lone superpower status, and they are even factually fair in pointing out that we don't always exert that status appropriately. We make mistakes sometimes too, after all. We've made our share in Iraq, to be sure, but leaving the place isn't how you correct them..is it Mr. "I want to be President without ever having to face reality?"

More below the "lies and the liars that tell them" fold...

Obama is getting a free pass from the anti-war media, despite the fact that the "reality of war and peace" is quite clear in the minds of his advisers. Obama is lying to you. An Obama administration will treat the Middle East no differently than a McCain administration-reality, and all that non-fluff stuff Barry likes to lie to you about, being what it is.

This election is about the mess he's going to make of the US...the economy, the health care system, the tax burdens on all of us, the small businesses he'll singlehandedly destroy, and the number and manner by which more innocent unborn children will be killed....it's NOT about how he'll deal with Iraq differently [read "pull them out of Iraq and send them to Afghanistan"], because he WON'T.

The WSJ piece suggests Obama might not understand the meaning of defeat. He needs to get the crash course on it in November.

In the close, WSJ's Bret Stephens reminds us of a passage in "the speech heard 'round the world" when "Obama noted that there was no point trying to best Mr. McCain in matters of experience, that what counted was good judgment".

Good judgment might have been for Obama to let go of the 100 years war rhetoric before the dots were connected between his lies to us on Iraq...or his poor judgment in selecting a campaign CO-CHAIR who sees Iraq exactly the same as McCain does.

Move to a new subject Barry-we know ALL about what you WON'T be doing in Iraq.

______________________________

Another Barack Obama Lie

By Erick [Erickson]

April 1, 2008

Redstate.com

Maybe when Barack Obama says he's not your typical politician, he really means he lies *even more* than your typical politician.

Leon's chronicled one lie about his liberal interest. Jeff had another lie about his church involvement. Below, Haystack chronicles another lie about his Iraq policy. Now, Jake Tapper has another one.

Obama has a new ad out excoriating Exxon for making millions of Americans money in their retirement accounts. Then he says, "I’m Barack Obama. I don’t take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists, and I won’t let them block change anymore."

Well, okay, but Mr. Fabulist is really stretching there. Tapper notes that Factcheck.org has called out Obama on this

and concludes that the statement  "misleading" since according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics Obama has taken more than $213,000 from individuals (and their spouses) who work for companies in the oil and gas industry -- not to mention that two of Obama's top fundraisers are top executives at oil companies"

 

It is literally true that Obama doesn't take money from oil companies. No federal candidate does -- corporations have been banned from direct contributions since 1907.

So yes, Obama did not take the legal maximum donation from Chevron's PAC of $5,000.00. He just took $9,500.00 from oil company employees -- more than could have been given by the company itself.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

This is another example of the State battling Faith and Christian American foundations in particular. A Homosexual moment of silence is being forced on Public School students to brain wash acceptance of Homosexual and other alternate lifestyles. Talk about a joint agenda, this is the will of atheists, homosexuals, secular humanists, moral relativists and Leftists in America and in Western Society. The agenda is to scrap Judeo-Christian based morality. I am certain many of those agenda persuasion sorts are unaware of the damage to social mores this is causing. The more the government removes Judeo-Christian values from our society the more our society becomes untrusting, dishonest, violent, thieving and hedonistic. Is that an America we wish to live in?

JRH 3/9/08 (See Also this Related Story)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Ann Coulter 10 sm HumanEventsOnline

I like Ann Coulter because she is Conservative who is not afraid to rock the Politically Correct boat. In her latest column Coulter not only takes on the hypocrisy of the Left’s tendency to promote an image of multicultural tolerance while disdaining Conservatives as all things evil and Christianity as an old myth which only the unintelligent still follow; Coulter makes a stab at the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a Leftist organization.

The launching pad for Coulter’s venom toward the ADL is because the ADL has attacked Dennis Prager (a Jewish individual) for his anti-Islamist stand.

The only criticism I have of Coulter’s column is the appearance of sympathy for the implied criticism of the ADL of Senator Robert Byrd’s racist past. Byrd was a card carrying and recruiting member of the Klu Klux Klan in old West Virginia. (Read a Conservatives view of Byrd’s KKK past HERE and the Slanted Left View of Byrd’s KKK past HERE.) Coulter may be expressing tongue-in-cheek however it is odd even in that way to show sympathy for a slanted Left aged Democrat with a racist past.

Otherwise Coulter’s analogies are right on piercing of Leftist hypocrisy with the reality of truth. Apparently the ADL has become so Left wing it is more concerned with Leftist ideology than with the survival of the existence of the Land of Israel, a Land that owes its modern existence to the butchery of Hitler’s Nazi/Fascist Holocaust.

Can you name the primary goal of Islamofascism? Its goal is the execution of a second Holocaust of Jews, particularly the ones living Israel.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Josef Stalin (admiration propaganda)

One of my friends at the Vox Community discovered one of the most libelous videos on David Horowitz and Conservatives who are educating America on the difference between Islamist Theo-political ideology and Mohammedanism.

I personally confess to being an Islamophobe because Mohammedan holy writings are the ammunition Islamists use to promote their dream of an intolerant international Caliphate in which the globe must submit. I know there are Mohammedans out there that condemn Islamism; however there are not nearly enough and most are quiet about the dastardly deeds of homicidal deaths inflicted on people who would otherwise could less of an Islamist existence.

This video by acg103 (can also be viewed at Humbled Infidel) is a load of crap skewed horribly by disinformation to use snippets to support an untrue accusation of hatred. In affect acg103 is spreading the hatred of Christianity and Conservatives who stand for morality and against Islamist theo-ideology.

If acg103 was caught by an Islamist, the terrorist would whack his head off for being an atheist. Acg103 may protest: “But I supported your right to practice your religion,” as the Islamist sword was drawn (as so many times in the past) to execute decapitation. [oops this link is now correct]

The Islamist might reply: “You are an infidel and worse, you do not believe in Allah.” As the blade begins its descent acg103 would these last words: Allahu Akbar (Allah-god is the greatest).

Acg103 has the audacity to call those who expose Islamism racists and hate mongers. In fact if you visit acg103’s YouTube site it is enmeshed in pink. Friends pink and red are colors of Marxists. Acg103 sounds like the kind of Marxist that used to dominate the old “Evil Empire” – The Soviet Union. The old Soviets were masters of using lies to try to propagandize their citizens and the foolish outside the Evil Empire’s sphere of influence.

O what a day it was when people like Ronald Reagan (representing the true America) and Pope John Paul II (symbolizing Christianity) brought the Evil Empire to its knees in a glorious collapse.

Acg103, the same exposition will happen to your pack of Left Wing lies!

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Jim Inhofe - Senator 3

If you wish to see how unpatriotic Leftist Democrats truly are, read the E-newsletter response by Senator Inhofe of a near death experience in Iraq:

JRH 8/31/07

***********************

Team Inhofe (E-Newsletter)
JimInhofe.com
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:11:03 -0400 (EDT)

Supporters of Senator Inhofe,

You may have already heard the news. Seven minutes into their departure from Iraq, the C-130 airplane Senator Inhofe was flying on was shot at by three rocket propelled grenades. Evasive action was taken by the skilled flight crew and flares were deployed in the event the rockets were heat-seeking.

I know your reaction to hearing Senator Inhofe is safely back in the United States is like ours: relief.

But an elected leader within the Oklahoma Democrat Party had a different reaction this morning: disappointment.

In fact, two liberal Democrat websites posted the news with headlines such as:

"So close yet so far...Inhofe plane fired on in Iraq"

"We can't get rid of this crazy bastard"

 

Can you believe that? It doesn't matter what party you belong to or even if you're a U.S. Senator: any time an American citizen safely returns from Iraq is cause for celebration.

______________