theway2k’s blog

Muslim Moles

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:42:49 -0500

The American Congress for Truth Blog posts and comments on an Investor’s Business Daily article that is about hostile Mohammedans working in the government while using their position to support Islamist terrorism in America and abroad.

Now this is a News piece that the full weight of the Mainstream Media should be brandishing to pressure the government bureaucracy to clean up its act. Does the MSM do so? NO!

Instead there is such a fear of violating the 21^st century disease of Political Correctness and hurting the religious feelings of Mohammedans even if they hate the American way of life and yet use the American Way to undermine America.

JRH 7/11/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Lebanon’s “300″

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:16 -0500

The 300 VS Persians

America fighting the Global War on Terror watches as anti-Hezbollah forces valiantly refuse to lie down.

The United Nations (the global joke on standing for peace and human rights) which has U.N. Peace Keeping Forces in Southern Lebanon watch as anti-Hezbollah forces valiantly refuse to lie down.

European Powers (France, Germany, Britain and EU) look the other way as anti-Hezbollah forces refuse to lie down.

Walid Phares equates the anti-Hezbollah forces to the Spartans legendary 300 that held Thermopylae against the invading superior military Persians long enough for the then usually internally fractured Greeks to come together to defeat Persia: The very Persia that calls itself today Iran.

Read Phares’ account of foreign Iranian and Syrian aid to Hezbollah to usurp the democratically elected government of Lebanon.

JRH 5/13/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

US: Ex-Guantanamo prisoner carried out Iraq suicide attack

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Wed, 07 May 2008 17:12:28 -0500

Gitmo

For all the bleeding heart Leftists wondering why Gitmo exists, READ THIS.

JRH 5/7/08

***************************************

US: Ex-Guantanamo prisoner carried out Iraq suicide attack

Yahoo News

May 7, 2008 11:50 AM CT

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - The U.S. military is confirming that a former Guantanamo detainee from Kuwait carried out a recent suicide attack in northern Iraq.

A spokesman for U.S. military's Central Command told The Associated Press on Wednesday that Abdallah Salih al-Ajmi took part in an attack in Mosul.

U.S. Navy Cmdr. Scott Rye says authorities don't know the motive for the attack, which was reported last week by Dubai-based Al-Arabiya television. Iraqi security forces were apparently targeted.

The U.S. transferred al-Ajmi to Kuwaiti custody from Guantanamo in 2005. A Kuwaiti court later acquitted him of terrorism charges.

_________________________

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Obama's Marxist Axis Of Friends

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 06 May 2008 15:09:23 -0500

Che Obama

Barack Hussein Obama’s Campaign slogan is “Change.”

He has enamored the youth of America with a slogan that sounds good but it is a slogan with little substance of the “Change” called for. The “Change” alludes to a regime change in America without divulging the specifics of “Change.”

Perhaps Obama’s associations can give America a clue to what “Change” is.

JRH 5/6/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

More Flying Imams

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:23:03 -0600

Flying Imams Cox&Forkum

Remember the “Flying Imams” of the Minneapolis Airport infamy?

Just as a quick reminder a group of Imams were preparing to fly to their homes in other parts of America after some Mohammedan conference in Minneapolis.

These Imams became very conspicuous by doing their overt Mohammedan prayers near the debarking point for the flight rather than the Airport Chapel.

Upon boarding the Imams performed suspicious behavior utilizing Arabic in a noticeable and scary way.

A few passengers became worried of terrorism. Hello, remember 9/11.

After all the Imams exploited their distinct Mohammedan hullabaloo, they were ejected from the flight.

Islamist-American organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) whined racism and Islamophobia. Well duh on the Islamophobia.

Thus the Imams decided to litigate against the Airline, Airport and the passengers.

Now mosey on over to Humbled Infidel to get the scoop on these Islamist Imams from a more spiritual than political Muslim.

Here is a clue to entice you to read the rest of the story: The Imams in their personal Mosques preach hatred toward America.

Does not one think the Imams are hypocritical enemies of America using the Western legal system to litigate concerning racism when in fact the Imams are the racists?

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Possible Outcomes of Pakistani Crisis Might ...

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:17:50 -0500

Pervez Musharraf 6-23-06

Possible Outcomes of Pakistani Crisis Might Even Change a Democrat’s Mind

Pervez Musharraf has imposed martial law in Pakistan. The official reason is because radical murdering Islamist terrorists are trying to bring their Theo-Political ideology as the rule of law and depose Musharraf.

I am certain there is an element of truth to the official reason; however I am betting the actual reason is elements outside of the military within the regime are trying to depose Musharraf, specifically Pakistan’s version of the Supreme Court.

Pakistan’s Supreme Court was about to rule on the legality of Musharraf’s election as President while retaining his spot as the head of the Pakistani military. The talk was the Court ruling was not going to happen to Musharraf’s benefit.

Although I am certain Musharraf would have used the military to brush off such a judicial ruling it would have angered the people in such a way that rioting might lead to sympathy to the radical Islamists followed by a Khomeini style people’s revolution.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and eight other judges refused to support Musharraf’s “emergency order.” Musharraf’s response was to depose the Chief Justice and rename another to replace him – Abdul Hameed Dogar.

Then there is the position of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto who returned to Pakistan recently under a deal with Musharraf to bring back democracy to Pakistan while siding with her families old military enemies to draw the people away from radical Islamism. Bhutto is a secular Socialist Muslim.

Bhutto officially complained about the Martial Law order; however I sense she understands her future in Pakistan will only occur with the military’s support combined with a hoped for elective support from the Pakistani people. Bhutto would be executed summarily if the likes of al Qaeda or the Taliban got their hands on her.

What was America’s official reaction? This from BBC News:

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the declaration of emergency rule was "highly regrettable" and called upon Pakistan to have free and fair elections.

In essence the US response was the politically correct response; a deposed Musharraf would be a huge hit on America’s war effort in the Middle East. It would be tough for America to lose an ally in Pakistan which could happen if Musharraf was deposed. There is the possibility that the Pakistan military might simply replace Musharraf with another top dog general and continue the policy of Musharraf under a different military political Administration.

Again though, a deposed Musharraf would pour prestige and allegiance of the Pakistani people to the radical Islamists. This could lead to a similar scenario of a Khomeini style revolution in Pakistan that the military could not stop without outright butchery and genocide.

What is the worst that could happen? O not much, a nuclear armed Wahhabi-Sunni-Taliban-al-Qaeda Islamist nation that hates America. The only plus would be incredible Sunni power probably would end the friendship with Shi’ite Iran who has no doubt been aiding the Waziristan Sunni radicals. I also suspect the old socialists in India will change their minds in rejecting America’s proffered hand of friendship and join in with American against radical Islamists in Pakistan and Iran.

Muslim Pakistan and Hindi India are nearly blood enemies and I suspect India could not stand for Mohammedan nuclear proliferation in the Middle East than America or Europe (although for different reasons).

Thus what Musharraf has done may be reported with media calm of just another dictatorial move in Pakistan; however I suspect the American military and policy strategists are scrambling to develop multiple alternative measures to choose from depending on which way the Pakistani crisis swings.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Muslims Silence Critics

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:42:45 -0500

Robert Spencer

Has anyone noticed the exposé thread of anti-Jihadists in America and Britain lately? Theme seems to be to let everyone know that Jihadists and Islamists are using Western Legal systems against Western Free Speech or Western reporting of Mohammedan suspicious behavior of the terrorist kind.

Maybe it is time to do a tit-for-tat in the legal system and begin utilizing civil suits against Mohammedan Charity Fronts for terrorists and wealthy Mohammedans reside in foreign nations. What is good for the goose is good for the gander as the cliché goes.

JRH 8/7/07

************************************

Muslims Silence Critics

By Robert Spencer

FrontPageMagazine.com 8/6/2007

After a police raid Friday at Your Black Muslim Bakery in Oakland, bakery employee Devaughndre Broussard admitted to murdering Chauncey Bailey, the editor of the Oakland Post. Bailey was writing a series of investigative articles about the Bakery – and that’s why, according to police, Broussard killed him.

Your Black Muslim Bakery is an outpost of the Nation of Islam, not of any orthodox Islamic sect, but in this murder Devaughndre Broussard has followed a pattern that some orthodox Muslims have also followed. Violent reprisal has long been an occupational hazard of those who dare to question or investigate Islamic groups or criticize Islamic practices. Filmmaker Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered in November 2004 by a Muslim who took exception to his criticism of the oppression of women in Islamic societies. In 1947, the Iranian lawyer Ahmad Kasravi was murdered in court by Islamic jihadists; Kasravi was there to defend himself against charges that he had attacked Islam.

Four years later, members of the same radical Muslim group, Fadayan-e Islam, assassinated Iranian Prime Minister Haji-Ali Razmara after a group of Muslim clerics issued a fatwa calling for his death. In 1992, the Egyptian writer Faraj Foda was murdered by Muslims enraged at his “apostasy” from Islam — another offense for which traditional Islamic law prescribes the death penalty. Foda’s countryman, the Nobel Prizewinning novelist Naguib Mahfouz, was stabbed in 1994 after accusations of blasphemy. And of course, there is the Iranian regime’s notorious death fatwa against Salman Rushdie.

Chauncey Bailey, moreover, is not the first person in the United States to have been murdered by a Muslim who didn’t like what he said. That distinction may belong to Rashad Khalifa, an unorthodox interpreter of the Qur’an who was murdered in Tucson, Arizona, in January 1990 – probably by a member of the jihadist group Jamaat al-Fuqra. But Bailey’s is still a singular case. Much more common has been the practice of trying to intimidate critics into silence through legal threats.

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has had great success with this over the years, although lately the tactic appears to be faltering. CAIR was unsuccessful in bullying the Young America’s Foundation into canceling a talk by me last week: the address went on as scheduled on Thursday. In 2006, CAIR dropped a lawsuit against Andrew Whitehead of Anti-CAIR after Mr. Whitehead’s attorney asked a series of probing questions during the discovery process. But before that, CAIR successfully cowed National Review magazine, Fox’s 24, and others into muting in various ways their criticism of Islamic violence and extremism.

Nor is CAIR alone among Muslims in its efforts at legal intimidation. Billionaire Saudi financier Khalid bin Mahfouz has sued journalist Rachel Ehrenfeld and others for libel in the U.K., where the libel laws favor plaintiffs. Ehrenfeld’s offense? In her book Funding Evil, she wrote that bin Mahfouz was involved in funding Hamas and al Qaeda. Bin Mahfouz denied that he had knowingly given any money to either. And Cambridge University Press has, in response to another libel suit filed by bin Mahfouz, just removed from circulation and destroyed all unsold copies of Alms for Jihad by Robert Collins and J. Millard Burr, because the book made essentially the same allegations. But France’s foreign intelligence agency has recently revealed that as long ago as 1996 Mr. bin Mahfouz was known as one of the architects of a banking scheme constructed for the benefit of Osama bin Laden – and that both U.S. and British intelligence services knew this.

The most notorious attempt at legal intimidation of all may be the Flying Imams case, in which six imams are suing US Airways because they were removed from a flight for suspicious behavior. They also attempted to sue the passengers who reported them, although this attempt has apparently been stymied by the retroactive immunity of the Peter King amendment to the Homeland Security bill. If the suit against the passengers had succeeded, imagine the effect: no one would dare report suspicious behavior in an airport or airplane, for fear of being sued. And jihad terrorists would have a free hand.

The lawyer for the Flying Imams is Omar T. Mohammedi, who as of 2006 was president of CAIR’s New York chapter.

The murder of Chauncey Bailey should provide renewed impetus to call upon the American Muslim community to take genuine action against the deeply ingrained culture of violence that provides the context in which such things happen. And the pattern of legal intimidation has been followed so many times now that Americans are becoming increasingly aware of how it works and how it can and must be resisted. For if this intimidation – both violent and nonviolent – is not resisted, those who are doing the intimidating will eventually succeed in establishing a protected class in America, an ideology that cannot be questioned or rejected. And that, more than anything else, will be the end of any semblance of Constitutional government.

________________________________

Robert Spencer is a scholar of Islamic history, theology, and law and the director of Jihad Watch. He is the author of six books, seven monographs, and hundreds of articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism, including Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World’s Fastest Growing Faith and the New York Times Bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.

Andrew Whitehead Interview

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Red Mosque siege declared over

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:25:32 -0500

Abdul Rashid Ghazi (Pakistan Islamist)

The Red Mosque stand off has ended with the Pakistan military scoring a victory. Abdul Rashid Ghazi met his demise. Ghazi’s death did not spark an anti-Musharraf rebellion in Pakistan as many Islamists had hope; it merely ended the siege of hate-monger radicals at the Red Mosque.

JRH 7/11/07
*******************************

Red Mosque siege declared over

Declan Walsh in Islamabad
Wednesday July 11, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Pakistan's prime minister, Shaukat Aziz, declared the Red Mosque siege over today, saying that government forces had regained full control of the compound after a 36-hour assault. "The operation is over. Everybody who was inside is out," Mr Aziz said. There had been "pretty reliable and accurate intelligence" about the mosque compound prior to the assault, but the security forces were still surprised by the ferocity of the resistance.

"These were trained, hardcore militants," he said.

A senior government official added that a number of foreigners - Uzbeks, Chechens, Tajiks and Afghans - had been arrested and were undergoing interrogation. Mr Aziz also said that the number of casualties had been much lower than expected. "We have not found any body of a woman or child yet," he said. "The government's policy ... has been vindicated.

"Now we will do the mopping up." But with the security forces restricting access to local hospitals, the government's refusal to release an updated official death toll added to fears that the actual number of READ THE REST ...

Read and post comments | Send to a friend