theway2k’s blog

A Schism over Shari'a in the Church of England

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:03:05 -0500

Dr. Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester

There are two Archbishops in Britain duking it out verbally in public over the affect of Mohammedanism in Britain.

Ironically Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams appears to be the appeasement minded head of the Anglican Church that is calling for a multiculturalism that accepts Mohammedan Sharia Law to compete or override the British rule of law as it applies to enforcement in Britain.

The Archbishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali by name is of Pakistani descent. Archbishop Nazir-Ali has been writing about how Mohammedanism is fracturing British society establishing in there are actually “no-go areas” for Brits in which the harshness of Sharia Law is exercised contrary to British Law.

Does America have this moronic appeasement to look forward to as Secular Humanists attempt to eradicate the influence of Christianity and accommodate the religion of Mohammedanism?

JRH 5/12/08

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Gallup Imprimatur and Radical Islam

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Thu, 08 May 2008 21:59:27 -0500

WhoSpeaksForIslam-Gallup

Well – Well – Well! One of the most famous pollsters in the world has been caught validating conclusions from data that is dubious. That pollster organization is Gallup. The authors that cooked the data are John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed. The books title is "Who Speaks for Islam?" The end game of the book is to establish the amount of 1.6 billion of the world’s Muslims that are radical Islamists is very miniscule.

In an interview Mogahed (probably unwittingly) showed the data gathering was flawed as well as the way in which the conclusions were derived.

So again I say WAKE UP AMERICA! Mohammedan civilization is NOT compatible with Western civilization’s evolved democratic principles of Liberty, Freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness; and that especially applies to America. European democracy has been so infected with egalitarian tolerance that radical Mohammedans use Western principles to slowly infect Europe’s Western culture with the virus of Islamism.

I was alerted to this pro-Mohammedan propaganda by Act! For America in an email. The email informs this:

Cooking the Books to Mask the Number of Islamic Radicals

In a stunning illustration of how apologists for militant Islam flat-out distort the truth, Robert Satloff writes in the Weekly Standard how John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed “cooked the books” to make their own data appear to show there were only a small percentage of “radical” Muslims worldwide.

Esposito and Mogahed make the claim that only 7% of Muslims worldwide are “radical.” That amounts to about 91 million Muslims. No small number.

But a closer examination of their data reveal that the number of those who are “radical” is actually at least twice that many, and more likely three to four times that many – or between 300 million and 480 million Muslims worldwide!

To discover just how they pulled off this sleight of hand, click on the link below to read Satloff’s article.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/066chpzg.asp?pg=1

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

ISLAMIC FINANCE IS UNAMERICAN, HURTS INFIDELS

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Thu, 01 May 2008 14:59:44 -0500

Church's Chicken logo

Man I have to tell you Church’s Chicken is one of the best fast food franchises serving good tasting Chicken. Alas, being a confirmed Islamophobe, I may think twice before I patronize Church’s Chicken again.

JRH 5/1/08

Axis of Evil Dollar

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Why We Left Islam

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:35:36 -0500

Why We Left Islam - Bk Jacket

“Why We Left Islam” is a book written by ex-Muslims sharing the truth of Islamic brutality wherever Islam/Mohammedanism is the predominant social structure. Of course this would focus on Middle East however there are enclaves Mohammedanism in Europe and America where Muslims dominate neighborhoods or cities; thus this would be true there as well.

That being said here is a review, a shameless promotion and an exposing of the Left and so-called Moderate Mohammedan organization by WorldNetDaily which I received via email.

Just to make a point: I say “shameless” because WND is the publisher and marketer of “Why We Left Islam.” I do not say shameless because the book is inaccurate. My God people experienced brutality or witnessed brutality and made a choice to be an ex-Muslim. In Mohammedan circles this is a brave choice. Forsaking Mohammedanism amongst the Mohammedan dominated is an offense worthy of death according to the death cult.

Here is WND’s marketing of “Why We Left Islam:”

JRH 4/30/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

CAIR admits it erred on Farah statement

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:24:26 -0500

Why We Left Islam - Bk Jacket

Now I know this WorldNetDaily article publicizing the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) previous accusation berating Douglas Farah and his newest book “Why We Left Islam” is basically a blatant promotion by WND for the book. Nonetheless it is amusing that CAIR did issue a retraction for its accusations against Farah and WND.

I am guessing the apology and retraction was out of the fear of a civil suit. Anti-CAIR has shown how to fight CAIR civil suits: ask for discovery of internal affairs (which must be provided). This is how Anti-CAIR forced CAIR to leave them alone. Obviously a legal inspection regarding discovery of the civil complaint could expose the true nature of CAIR’s agenda to the American public. I speculate most Americans would find CAIR’s activities un-American when placed into the public microscope.

Go Farah!

JRH 4/26/08

CAIR busted

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Bushtolike Pilon: Low Brow Intellect

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:05:35 -0500

Muhammad(pbuh), by Devereaux

A Comment left by “Bushtolike Pilon” denigrated the United States of America at this blogspot post: “Al-Sadr may restart full-scale fight against US in Iraq.” I have posted this same title on most of the social blogs I am a member of as well.

This is what Bushtolike Pilon wrote:

The greatest worldwide thief is the blue eyed devil! Every where he goes there is only destruction, mayhem and death. Wake up buddy who is more blood thirsty for oil? The answer is the west and Usa!! You are just as fucking moron talking shit through your fat blue eyed ass.
Have fun for now as the BIG DRAGON China will soon kick your fat crap talking butt into chowmein. Have fun!!!

Fri Apr 25, 02:58:00 AM 2008

The person has to be a Lefty or a Muslim-America for the person broadcast the intellect of the low brow vulgar slang that is often used by the American Left. Obviously the person chose epithets rather than cogitative thinking to refute my opinion.

Here is my comment response:

There may indeed by a show down between America and China over oil. God forbid if China wins, then the Middle East would truly understand the brutality of an atheistic nation.
Mohammedans have their eye on Israel, USA and the West; however it is the largest persecutor of all religions that makes torture done by Mohammedans look like a picnic. Under Mao tse Tung (or which ever way you choose to write his name), China slaughtered over 35 MILLION people to re-educate and eradicate religion. A program still continued to this day against all religions and particularly focused on Christians, Buddhists (Tibet) and Mohammedans.
If you are a Mohammedan, you are a dumb ass to think China will not slaughter Mohammedans if they win such a confrontation with America. If you are a Communist, you are a dumb ass for supporting such a murderous government.
In fact look at list of genocides and note that America is not even on the list; however the rogue governments of the Middle East main suppliers of weapons are number one and two.
Oil is indeed an economic weapon used as an excuse for National Interests of Super Powers and imposing global intolerance by third rate Mohammedan nations that have oil under their ground.
You know the third rate power nations will not win an oil war. You had better hope America wins if such a war arises. We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them.
Who did you say was blood thirsty for Oil?

Fri Apr 25, 01:01:00 PM 2008

As you can tell, I can be totally irritated at people that use profanity to delusionally make a point. The only point that is made that way is proof the Conservative-Christian path is the way to go for morality and National Defense of the American way of life.

UPDATE: I probably won’t continue to follow up anymore; however the commenter has left a similar comment this time under the name “anonymous.” I was not sure previously whether the person was a Marxist/Leftist or a Mohammedan. I now convinced the person is a Mohammedan.

I will first post the Mohammedan drivel followed immediately by my response:

Anonymous said...

Your list is written by the Usa itselt and a big lie. Vietnam is the American genocide and before that the genocide of the american indians who are still suffering under the invaders. Dont fool yourself we are not that dumb.
"We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them."The lie of millennium
You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc.

Fri Apr 25, 01:48:00 PM 2008

My response:

Theway2k said...

Anonymous now I know you are a moron. That list was compiled NOT by the US Government but by one of the Left Wing universities in America. In fact I'd say Berkley is so deluded in its Leftism that they support Islamofascist Mohammedans over America in the Global War on Terror.

[Not in the original comment: It is true the Native Americans were mistreated horribly in history by the American Government as it expanded from the East Coast to the West Coast; however the Native Americans not only have full citizenship, freedom and liberty today but the Federal American Government provides extra perks and in some cases allow laws to occur that supersedes State and Local Government (revenue via the gambling industry as one example).

How many Church Bells ring in Mohammedan dominated land? What kind of equal rights under the law do Christian, Jews and non-Muslims have under the Mohammedan rule of law (in many cases where Medieval Sharia Law is the dominant foundation)?

Yes that is correct: ZIP, ZERO, NADA AND NOTHING.]
You said: "You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc."
That is the perfect description of a Mohammedan except maybe the alcohol (which is replaced by smoking drugs).
So Wake-Up America! This is the kind of deluded lies that Middle Eastern Mohammedans or American-Islamist Mohammedans truly believe. Even revisionist Leftist Academics disagree with the Mohammedan mind!

Fri Apr 25, 03:52:00 PM 2008

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Barack and Barack Supporting Google both Anti-Christian?

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:54:59 -0500

Net Neutrality

Erick Erickson of Redstate.com has sent an e-list email encouraging his readers to protest to Congress about Larry Lessig of Google and Barack Obama.

His complaint is threefold.

1. Larry Lessig is pro-Net Neutrality.

2. Larry Lessig is virulently anti-Christian and moves Google in that direction.

3. Lessig is a huge political supporter of Obama; thus Obama has another guilt by association by allowing Lessig’s support of his campaign.

I am not sure if I understand Erickson’s anger about Lessig being for Net Neutrality. Net Neutrality is like the sun, it shines its light on the good and evil at the same time. Net Neutrality certainly allows the evil in this world to exploit a form of communication; however Net Neutrality offers the same exact ability for good to be on the Internet.

I am guessing Erickson’s ire is because Google under Lessig’s direction may be guilty of not allowing pro-Christian websites to be accessed via the Google search engine. If the allegation is true (and I don’t doubt that it is), then Lessig’s defense of Net Neutrality is Leftist hypocrisy. In essence Lessig is promoting Leftwing pro-Mohammedan websites and ridiculing Christ and Christian websites as well as definitely NOT providing neutrality for all users of the Google search engine.

This is a revelation that saddens me. I like using the Google search engine. Unfortunately I am finding out when I place a search for some Christian specific information, Google may be biased as a guide.

Then there is Barack Obama. Obama openly receives support from anti-Christian Lessig. Could this further expose light on Obama’s other associations with Nation of Islam racist Louis Farrakhan and Black Supremacist Christian Jeremiah Wright?

Couple this with Obama’s recent denigration of Pennsylvania rural dwellers (ergo all rural dwellers) as ignorant gun-toting individuals that rely on religion for solace on and comfort and what do you have a picture of?

It is a picture of an anti-Christian candidate running for the Democratic nomination for President.

JRH

************************

Obama Adviser Denigrates Jesus. Don't let him get away with it.

Redstate.com Email Alert

Erick Erickson

April 21, 2008 7:04:14 AM

ACTION ITEM: Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee at 202-224-5115 and protest Larry Lessig and Google denigrating Christ while Google censors Christians online. Details below.

A friend and adviser to Barack Obama, Larry Lessig, is going to testify before Congress on Tuesday to advocate for "net neutrality," a position strongly supported by Google,Inc.

Google, recently allowed Larry Lessig to talk to Google employees. During his talk, Lessig showed a video of Jesus, depicted as gay and wearing a diaper singing the song "I Will Survivor" until Christ is run over by a bus. You can see for yourself here.

Lessig told Google's employees, "This is a little bit touchy to some people. I don't get it, so just chill."

Google and Lessig believe that intellectual property rights should be curtailed and internet providers should be forced to allow anyone and everyone to use their networks.

While Google is pushing net neutrality and blaspheming Christ, Google is also censoring Christians online. As I document here, Google has censored a pro-life group online. Google has also been sued for anti-Christian discrimination in the United Kingdom.

Of course, while Google is happy to censor Christians while denigrating Christ, Google has gone out of its way to censor content that might offend muslims.

Google should have no right to demand open access to your internet while censoring and denigrating Christians on its network. And the Senate should not give Larry Lessig a platform to advocate Google's position while Google behaves in that manner.

Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee and tell them you find it disgraceful that Google could advocate an open internet while censoring Christians and laughing while Larry Lessig denigrates Christ. The number is 202-224-5115.

Also, please forward this to your friends. Have your friends join this list. We should not let the left get away with denigrating Christ and sending those who do to Congress to advocate for companies that routinely censor Christians.

Together, we can stop this.

All the best,

Erick Erickson
Editor, RedState.com

Forward This Email to a Friend

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Is it Time for a 28th Amendment?

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:04:45 -0500

Radical Islam Threatening

Hans Gruen has posted a proposed version of a fictional 28^th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The theme of Gruen’s Amendment is to declare Islam (I prefer Mohammedanism) NOT a religion and instead a political ideology.

Frankly I agree with Gruen’s assessment (particularly radical Islamism); however I fear the American public is not convinced Mohammedanism is more a political ideology than a religion.

One of Gruen’s commenters noted that a call for an Amendment to outlaw Mohammedanism has been thought upon already. There is even a petition going around the Internet to outlaw Mohammedanism. I am going to seek out and sign this petition; however I am fairly certain (at this point) that the lack of Jihad education in America will find this Amendment repugnant.

A grassroots movement in America needs to be started (something like Gabriel's - Act! For America - has began) to spread the word about the ideology of Mohammedanism as opposed to the religious practice of Mohammedanism.

I think a better possibility is to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage without establishing any particular Jewish sect (Orthodox, Conservative or Reformed) or Christian Denominations (Variations of Protestantism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox etc.) as a State religion.

This would simultaneously deal with Secular Humanism war on Christianity and radical Islam.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend