5 posts tagged “iraq wmd”
I find it fascinating that the US Senate Intelligence Committee denounced President Bush as misrepresenting the Intel given him that he used to convince Congress to invade Iraq.
Here is the fascinating thing: All the Left Democrats and two RINO Republicans (RINO = Center Left to Fringe Left) put their name on the Senatorial condemnation and the rest of the Republicans (including the ranking Republican on the Committee) denounced the Senate Intelligence Committee denunciation of President Bush.
Yes friends it is a pure ploy by the Cut-n-Run Party to give ammunition to their Democratic nominee to sway the public to NOT look at Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s bona fide connection to Marxism. O YES: The kind of Marxism that wishes to over turn the American Way of life!
President Bush’s invasion of Iraq may have used Intelligence meant to make him look bad; nonetheless the tyrant Saddam HUSSEIN was a supporter of terrorism even if that support could not be directly linked to al Qaeda. Let’s see, let me count the ways: HUSSEIN was a genocidal butcher of Sunni enemies, Shiite faithful and Kurds. He used chemical WMD on his own citizens and attempted to build a weapons grade nuclear site that only the Israelis had the cajones to prevent.
So if HUSSEIN did not have WMD, pick another reason. He had to go! If only the West would wake up about the rogue nations supporting or allowing Islamist terrorists to function in their reign of terror for whatever chauvinistic Islamic reason that can be come with.
Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s solution is to talk with Islamists who are noted for lying to stall for time to accomplish an agenda. O yes, this is where I bring up the much Leftist denounced Hitler/Nazi card. It may be cliché by now however it is cliché because it is true. Appeasement brings war, it does not prevent it. Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler and the Munich Agreement AGAIN are the historical proof.
So I say to the Senate Intelligence Committee: Pull up your pants legs for there is a load of horse manure being politicized to aid Barack HUSSEIN Obama and by association with President Bush, make Senator John McCain appear to have rolled out the manure.
I pray that McCain is wise enough to demonstrate just how much manure is plastered Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
I operate many blogs, some of a social nature and a few are just blogs for anyone to show up. My pet blog is SlantRight.com. My son has purchased the rights to the name and operates it on his servers for me for free. It is the Dad discount.
I rarely spread comments from one blog to the others; however I received a comment from “More Democrat ‘aid and comfort’ to the enemy” on my Mindsay blog which is more of a social blog. The comment was made by a person that goes by the moniker of Moralnihilist. Moralnihilist said little but it irked me a lot. So I am sharing my distinct charm around in my reply.
Moralnihilist said:
The purpose of the Iraq war was to line the pockets of George W Bush's oil buddies, nothing more. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was no threat. ...
We've already spent 10 times what we spent in Vietnam, and the cost in lives has been tragic.
I guess Ann Coulter is correct: Liberals Lie!
The Dems and Bush reacted to the same Intelligence of the time. Even President Clinton understood that Saddam Hussein was dangerous but did not have the cajones to do what GW did. Clinton's awareness of Iraq and transnational terrorists may never be completely known because the treasonous Dem used his security clearance to destroy classified material related to Clinton.
Whether or not the validity of WMD in Iraq is actual or mystified is irrelevant. The fact remains Hussein has shown in the past no hesitation to attack his neighbors for hegemonic gain and profit (with Iran the US aided him and with Kuwait we were against him). This is not to mention the brutality that Hussein and his psycho-sons inflicted on Iraqi citizens. Even now in 2008 mass graves of slaughtered men, women and children are haphazardly stumbled upon.
The only reason the U.S. does not send a military force to remove the butchering Arab Muslims from Sudan is the Islamic world would wrongly perceive it as an attack on Islam. Western nations even with the potential of their combined power to remove the current Sudanese government fear the Islamic reaction (The West is dominated by Left Wing cowering dhimmis). The genocide against Black Muslims in Darfur and Black Christians in Southern Sudan is enough reason to take out the regime. It is a demonstration of dhimmification of the U.N. and the protection of Communist Chinese that such action is not even close to being a consideration.
As far as oil goes: duh!! Are you an American or a dimwitted American? Islamists (though a growing minority in the Middle East) run the perceptions of America. If Islamists control oil in Iraq as well as oil in Iran and the Saudi Monarchy is a sneeze away from joining the Shah of Iran's fate. How do you think the National Interests of America would be affected if Islamists controlled the life blood of the World's economy? Can you say convert or no oil? That would mess up the Dems utopian delusional vision on how we should respect what happens in another nation's internal affairs.
As for the Iraq and Vietnam comparisons, the only thing valid that you have asserted is the unpopularity (forged into the minds by a Leftist MSM ignoring other facts and the Dems exploiting the non-reported facts) of the Iraq War in America.
So in essence Moralnilhilist, you are full of manure. I leave it to you decide what kind.
John Loftus of IntelligenceSummit.org is one of probably who has had an opportunity to sift the secret and Intelligence files of butcher Saddam Hussein. Loftus has come to a conclusion concerning the Weapons of Mass Destruction that the US Military never discovered which the Bush Administration was certain were in Iraq.
It has been the hangman’s noose of the Left discrediting the Bush Administration with sayings such as “Bush lied, people died”. And as Loftus pointed out, Neocon diehards (such as myself) still believe WMD is somewhere in the Iraqi desert (or in my belief, transported out of Iraq).
Loftus’ analysis apparently embarrasses everybody thus it is not likely to be admitted by the American Left or the American Right.
There is something fishy about George Tenet. He has begun his public appearances to publicize his tell-all book “At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA.” Tenet is basically lining up on the Democratic Party side pertaining to the invasion of Iraq.
My first reaction is: What in the world was President Bush retaining an intelligence Director from the Clinton Administration. That was dumb.
My second reaction is: Tenet is telling a different story in his book than what he told Congressional hearings that led to the invasion of Iraq. That makes Tenet a liar who does not want history to blame him if the Democrats write the history books.
Tenet originated the expression that it was a “slam dunk” that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Saddam’s Iraq. There is even an implication that the lack of finding WMD was a cover-up (by unknown agencies or people) because lack of military man power allowed Saddam loyalists, Syria or Russia to covertly extricate the WMD. That would be a screw-up that Tenet would probably be aware of.
Victor Davis Hanson castigates Tenet on differences from book and public statements of record pertaining to al Qaeda involvement in Saddam’s Iraq.
Thanks to Sandy Berger (Clinton’s Chief of Staff) shredding classified documents that never made it to the pertinent commissions, thus inaccurate conclusions was made pertaining to WMD and al Qaeda involvement.
Related to: Sleeper Cells in the United States and Canada
Okay I know that AboveTopSecret.com may enter the fringe of Conspiracy Theory, however every good theory has data to extrapolate a theory. A linguist in Arabic with a military background makes for high-end usage in Intelligence work. Such a person is Dave Gaubatz. Gaubatz is legit no matter your thoughts on conspiracy theory.
Here is an AboveTopSecret.com Interview with Dave Gaubatz. Actually it is a summary of a June 22, 2006 interview. The date is important because it both disputes the Duelfer Report and shows the Democrats to be political deviants lying to the Mainstream Media (MSM) or in collusion with MSM to give the impression there was no WMD in Iraq.
In fact if you listen to a Leftie political pundit they always deliver this pompous indignant question: Where is the WMD? This is usually followed by a bunch of hyperbole criticizing President Bush (you know – Bush Lied, soldiers died).
Another aside about the Duelfer Report unrelated to the AboveTopSecret.com interview is the Sandy Berger (Clinton Chief of Staff) shredding of classified documents relating to the War on Terror and possibly WMD in Iraq. We will never know what was in those documents because Clinton stooge Sandy Berger is not talking about the why. Berger’s only lame excuse is somehow the documents got tucked into his socks and he forgot to put them back then they mysteriously were shredded.
Okayyyyyyyyy?
Another aside is an obvious CIA set-up with Plamegate that the facts are now showing light that there were mysterious circumstances as to why Plame sent anti-war (proven liar) Wilson on a fact finding expedition to Niger.
Yada Yada.
You should read that Dave Gaubatz Interview with AboveTopSecret.com.
