theway2k’s blog

Iran’s Mullocracy Makes War Inevitable

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:21:12 -0500

Moshe Sharon writes that has Israel has only shot at Iran. Success is vital in a surgical strike for if it fails utterly or beyond expectations, Iran and its proxies could deliver a blow that could end Israel’s existence.

Personally I think success or failure is irrelevant. A surgical strike on Iran’s nuke capability may make the world safer from radiation fall-out; however Iran and it military surrogates are going to respond anyway. I suspect America’s aid might be the only thing to tip Israel’s defense to a favorable outcome.

Does that mean Israel should abandon a surgical strike against Iran because the stakes would be inevitable?

I say no!

Sharon also points out that the Mullah controlled Shi’ites of Iran and Ahmadinejad’s belief in Mohammedan destiny means Iran will attack Israel eventually. Sharon quotes a Mohammedan Hadith (which the Sunnis also preach) that is prevalent clerical sermons:

The last hour will not come unless the Muslims fight against the Jews, and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and the stone or the tree would say: "Muslim! Servant of Allah! Here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him!"

Coupling this Mohammedan race hatred of Jews and a military desire to rebuild the ancient Iranian hegemony in the Middle East probably means Israel will be the inevitable focus for a reason to begin a war. Thus Israel may be faced with fighting a conventional war or a nuke war. Israel could lose both with undoubted Israeli defensive damage to the Mohammedan world; however a conventional war might be Israel’s best chance to survive.

Sharon points out effectively that Iran or any other aggressors might be stung pretty badly by an Israeli strike; however the little sliver of a land known as Israel could be devastated off the map. Thus Sharon points outs Israel only has one shot.

JRH 7/18/08 (Hat tip Prophecy Update)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Hizbullah Gears Up For War, Olmert Asks for UN Help

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:42:31 -0500

Hezbollah rocket ranges

Here is another Mainstream Media (MSM) failure: Hezbollah is arming missile war heads with chemical weapons.

Israel ended the invasion of Lebanon because the United Nations promised a security force that would stand between Syria and Hezbollah. The U.N. organization so called is the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). UNIFIL is so worthless that it does not even attempt to stop the flow of arms from Syria to Hezbollah and yet is quick to point out any potential violations of Israel’s agreement to cease hostility inside Lebanon aimed at Syria and Iran’s client terrorist organization known as Hezbollah.

Now with speculation that Israel (and some hint America) may operate a preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear capabilities we read that Hezbollah is arming their missiles with Chemical WMD.

The United Nations is a piece of irresponsible dung and UNIFIL is the dung client doing the dhimmi wishes of radical Islam which is determined to wipe Israel off the map.

JRH 7/16/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

A tale of two hostages

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:42:13 -0500

Entebbe_Rescue_map

Caroline Glick nails it! Appeasement is a defeatist’s attitude. Appeasement will always lead to defeat. A victor’s attitude may not always lead to victory however the odds are better the long war will be won.

JRH 7/13/08 (Hat tip ICJS)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Take the GWOT to the Enemy’s Economy

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:18:09 -0500

Robert Zubrin ('Energy Victory')

This story is nearly a year old. I was alerted to it by the blog Report on Arrakis. Here is the story.

Robert Zubrin wrote a book in 2007 entitled “Energy Victory.” The book can be purchased at Zubrin’s promotional website EnergyVictory.net. Here is the promotional paragraph on the book:

“Introducing ‘Energy Victory’: a bold plan for breaking the economic stranglehold that the OPEC oil cartel has on our country and the world by best selling author Robert Zubrin”.

I have to be honest I have never heard of Robert Zubrin; nonetheless Kyros of Report on Arrakis got my attention with this short post:

By mandating Flex Fuel Cars, the US Congress can break the oil cartel’s vertical monopoly on the international fuel supply, protecting consumers worldwide from the threat of future unlimited OPEC prices increases, and taking our fate out of the hand’s of terrorism’s financiers.

You have to know why this grabbed my attention. Yes sirree, the price of gas at the pumps. Just imagine having an actual feasible plan to wean Americans away from the oil dependence from a group of people (even if some of the Mohammedan governments pretend to be American friendly) who hate the very air we breathe.

The book “Energy Victory” is probably more relevant now in 2008 than when it was published in 2007. Zubrin has been giving speeches promoting the plan in his book. CSPAN has been running a November 2007 speech. The most recent speech on CSPAN was in April 2008 and can be viewed online at CSPAN’s website.

On Zubrin’s website there is a link to a November 2007 review of “Energy Victory” which gives a glimpse of Zubrin’s plan to throw a monkey wrench into the domination of foreign dependence on suspect friends and obvious American enemies. The science of oil deliverance is a tad beyond my comprehension; ergo you should go to the book review and let me know what you understand taking a stab in the heart of foreign oil.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

AGAIN! Iran Threatens Reprisal if Nuke Program Attacked

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:33:23 -0500

ME-War-Oil 1

I utilize an InJesus Group known as Prophecy Update frequently as a source of information. Prophecy Update searches for news around the world from secular and Christian sources and puts together a daily report which relates to End Times Prophecy and sends it out as an e-newsletter. As you might guess the focus tends to be the Middle East.

The Middle East for decades now has been growing as a region of Mohammedan hatred toward the West with America and Israel in its telescopes. I think America viewed Islamofascist terrorism as a pesky nuisance until 9/11. Then it became obvious that these Islamic radicals had the ability to exact global terrorism that affects the global economy in a negative way in the West.

Israel has had to deal with this threat from the very time of its modern inception in 1948 when surrounding Arab nations thought they would annihilate Jewish Israelis in a second Holocaust terminating a Jewish homeland before it could even get started.

Obviously the true God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had other ideas. The soundly outnumbered Israelis not only repulsed the 1948 invasion, but it has successfully repulsed several other invasions since 1948.

Now the rogue nations of Iran and Syria joined by transnational terrorists like Hezbollah and Hamas have upped the stakes in the constant Mohammedan pursuit to destroy Israel. Iran is becoming a regional hegemon building nuclear plants with the capability of producing weapons grade uranium for nuclear weapons.

Have you looked at a Middle Eastern map lately? Israel is still a speck of water surrounded by an ocean of hostile Mohammedans. Weary Israel is currently dominated by a government that has fallen hook, line and sinker for the concept that giving up what little Land it has acquired from God ordained victories will result in peace. And yet Iran continues to pursue weapons grade uranium. With the talk of giving up land at least the Israeli government has no illusions what a nuclear armed Iran would mean to the existence of Israel.

With that in mind there has been talk of either an American or Israeli strike against Iranian nuclear facilities (or both) to slow down the manufacturing of weapons grade uranium.

So check out the first two articles from Prophecy Update. One is from the British Telegraph and the other is from Israel’s Haaretz. Both articles relate Iran is saber rattling that if ANY attempt to strike Iranian nuclear facilities occurs, Iran will blockade the Straits of Hormuz which 40% of the globe’s oil supply is shipped through.

So here is the Iranian tactic: 1) Stand by and assert that their nuclear program is peaceful (Yeah and I have a sand dune for sale real cheap); 2) Tell the UN, America and the EU that we all need to talk about it (stalling for time); or 3) Threaten America and Israel with a retribution that could affect the entire world’s economy and/or safety.

Most of the world appears to lean toward selling out Israel under the delusion an Islamic Agenda will stop in the Middle East; however Europe is already inundated with hostile Mohammedans that are giving every indication of overwhelming the continent with a Mohammedan birthrate.

Geez my fellow Westerners and Americans – WAKE-UP! The cancer of radical Islam has to be nipped in the bud even if it means a world war OR the West will it appease its way into subjugated dhimmitude.

I am not willing to replace my Liberty and Freedom with the despotism of Sharia Law and subservient dhimmitude. Are you?

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, Part 10

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:22:33 -0500

Jihad this Mohammed

Here is another dose of “An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam” by the Political Islam website.

Bill Warner is a little terse in this essay. I would even say it might border on hate speech; indeed I know Mohammedans will consider this essay hate speech.

Warner targets Islam specifically as the enemy of all non-Muslims of all races, creeds, religions and political spectrums.

I preface this warning of hate speech because I have to tell you, Warner is correct of the nature of Islam whether Mohammedan practitioners view Mohammedanism as a spiritual faith or a death cult to violently over take the world with Mohammed’s vision of political conquest under the instilled fervor radical cultic devotion. The essence of Mohammed’s example and Mohammedanism’s general practice in nations where it is the majority is evidentiary of its non-peaceful existence. The West where Freedom and Liberty has become a learned heritage, the minority Mohammedans have began to be so bold as to demand government recognition of Sharia Law; indeed honor killings and rape are increasing in the West more so in Europe but the beginnings are emerging in America.

JRH 6/14/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

From an Army Rangers mouth about Iraq

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:50:20 -0500

Eagle & Lady Liberty

Here is the attitude of most American Patriots serving our nation in Iraq and Afghanistan. Compare it with the Leftists.

Made and Posted on Youtube by Lewismadmax
Lewismadmax's words below:
"He is there, he knows, I share it with you now, please get a kleenex, if you don't need one......you have no soul!

BTW: Vic was killed in a roadside bomb last July, his real name was Mike.

God bless a country that made him hide."

I would say "God have mercy on a country that made him hide his identity.

Hat tip to Humbled Infidel.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam #9

nobody@vox.com(theway2k) — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:20:00 -0500

War on Islam

I found this website called Political Islam. I signed up to receive a weekly e-newsletter which is also posted on the website. I pretty much agree with Political Islam’s purpose which is to expose and educate about Political Islam as well as to advocate ways or thoughts to with stand the death cult.

I like the website because it is definitely not Politically Correct. Frankly I suspect it is just a matter of time that American fifth column organizations like Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) will denounce the truth from the website as racist and bigoted.

So what! Sometimes you have to slap someone to wake them up!

I did post the last e-newsletter which is part of a series. I don’t know if it is in the middle or nearing the end of the series for the one I am posting today is Part 9.

JRH 6/8/08

****************************

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam

This newsletter is one of a series on the subject-Newsletter #9

Bill Warner

June 3, 2008

Political Islam

The Near Enemy

We have two sets of enemies. The far enemy is the politics of Islam. The near enemies are the dhimmi apologists, fueled by ignorance and multiculturalism and political correctness.

Our universities present Islamic history as a glorious triumph. Humanity's greatest moment came in the Islamic golden age. The Crusades were Western evil. Cultural self-loathing manifests in showing the history of the West as oppression and Islam is seen as liberating. Women's oppression under Islam is seldom discussed in feminist classes. Israel is condemned and jihadists are presented as "freedom fighters". Christianity is criticized, Islam is praised.

Leftist/liberal/progressive intellectuals give frequent speeches at universities while conservative speakers are sometimes forbidden to speak or toughs are allowed to drive them from the stage.

The dhimmis and the oppressed does not exist in universities. Muslims dictate what will be said about Islam in textbooks.

The news media rarely publishes anything about the Islamic doctrine. Most Islamic terror is never mentioned. The dots are never connected. Each event of Islamic violence is seen on its own and never as part of a pattern. The media love to follow up any bad news about Islam with Muslims speaking "nice".

The near enemy finds good reasons not to publish Mohammed cartoons, and find reasons to feel good about being a dhimmi. The near enemy criticized the Pope when he gave a historic quote about Islam's violence even when Muslims killed Christians in protest and called for the Pope's death.

A public policy of political correctness and multiculturalism forbids criticism of Islam as being racist and violent.

Pacifism

The elites have a solution for Islam. War is evil and causes suffering. If you treat people well, they will treat you well. This is a logical fallacy that if we treat others well they will treat us well. That is true, if and only if, they follow the Golden Rule.

So if the Golden Rule inspires you to be non-violent, and if the person you are dealing with also practices the Golden Rule, all is fine. But if the other person doesn't follow the Golden Rule, then they can take advantage of you.

Let's take three brief historical examples. The Buddhists of ancient Afghanistan were the descendents of Alexander the Great's warriors. The warriors had been converted to pacifism by Buddhism. Along came Islam and killed every single pacifist who would not convert to Islam. The result is that Buddhism was annihilated in Central Asia.

Martin Luther King applied Gandhi's non-violence to civil rights and it worked. Why? American culture was infused with the Golden Rule and we changed. If Martin Luther King had tried non-violence in Mecca to protest Arabia's religious apartheid, he would have been imprisoned or driven out. Islam does not follow the Golden Rule.

Gandhi used non-violence to shame the British over their rule of India and it worked since the British honored the Golden Rule. But when India practices tolerance with Muslims in India, they get taken advantage of every time.

Pacifists are idealists, not pragmatists, so they claim that any historical failure of pacifism is due to the fact that they just were not pacifistic enough.

All pacifists are social parasites. Every pacifist lives in a nation that was created by blood, since every nation's borders were a result of a violent struggle. Every pious pacifist depends upon someone else to do the dirty work of violence to protect them.

Pacifism can be seen as the societal version of AIDS. AIDS destroys the body's ability to defend itself against infections. Pacifism destroys a society's ability to defend itself against aggression.

Politics is a matter of perception. What pacifists don't know is that Islam sees them as not as a kind and reasonable people, but as dhimmis. Dhimmis are indistinguishable from pacifists. They both submit to Islam on whatever issue is at hand.

An Ethical Basis for War

Let's define the situation:

· Islam has a dualistic ethical system that denies the nature Golden Rule. It posits that all people are not equal.

· Islam is a dualistic political system that divides all the world into believers and non-believers.

· Islam has an eternal, universal mandate to annihilate all political systems based upon the ethics of unity.

· Intimidation, demands, and violence may be used against the kafirs.

· 270,000,000 kafirs have been killed by political Islam. Over half of Buddhism, Christianity and Hinduism have been annihilated by political Islam.

· Islam cannot be reformed.

· Compromise is only a step towards dhimmitude.

There is no compromise that is logically possible between dualistic ethics and ethics of unity. There is no halfway point between honesty and deceit, freedom and slavery, equality and dhimmitude.

So the choice is between submission and annihilation or war and freedom. The third choice is dhimmitude, or a slow death, since every dhimmi population becomes Islamic over time.

We propose that to preserve our ethical civilization we must defeat political Islam. The question is: how shall we conduct this war?