8 posts tagged “conspiracy”
Conspiracy Theory is that enigmatic concept in which an urban legend or a conclusion arrived by a series facts and fictions occurs.
I love Conspiracy Theory not as an avid believer in the conspiracy but in the intriguing mysteries that often read as good fiction.
However sometimes when a Conspiracy Theory is derived from verifiable facts, something may ring true or partially true. Even so the verifiable facts might be arranged to form a conclusion based on expectations rather than a realistic conclusion arrived by line upon line leading to a legitimate educated guess.
I am a man of faith so definitely I may fall prey to a conclusion based on expectations rather a true educated guess.
I wrote all that because I found an article I found on Prophecy Update. If you are unfamiliar with Prophecy Update, it is an InJesus Group that publishes a daily dose of news from various non-MSM outlets that point to the website’s view of Biblical prophetic writing.
So check this article out by Bill Wilson which I will post below. Is it a Conspiracy Theory or an educated guess?
JRH 1/6/08
***************************
Connecting the Dots — Prophecy of Jeremiah in Play as Islam Uses Terror, Instability to Buy Control of Worldwide Babylon
By Bill Wilson, KIN Senior Analyst
Posted at Prophecy Update
January 6, 2008
The War of Islamic Aggression is planning a surprise attack on all non-Islamic nations. In fact, the strategy is already in play, and the West has taken the bait. The surprise will be when the West wakes up to the fact that Islam has taken over the world by controlling the oil, the finances, the debt and the economic power of non-suspecting nations like the United States.
Islam has used terrorism to increase world instability, which has raised oil prices. The windfall from the oil price increases has been used to buy financial institutions, bail out major credit institutions, and increase holdings over government debt in enemy nations — the United States being the prime target.
The year 2007 saw some mighty obvious signs of this strategy. The purchase of a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange by Islamic governments in Dubai and Qatar was just one leg in the strategy. But the purchase of the NASDAQ by Dubai was even more clever. When Dubai bought roughly 20 percent of the NASDAQ exchange, it sweetened the deal by affording NASDAQ a piece of ownership in the Sweden stock exchange, OMX.
The United Arab Emirates seized an opportunity to bail out Citigroup to the tune of $7.5 billion, and Citigroup will pay junk bond rates of 11 percent interest for the privilege. You see, Islam doesn't charge interest on its own people, but the infidels get charged usury.
Moreover, the price of oil has hit record highs of over $100 per barrel — not because of supply limitations (experts say there is more oil on the market than ever), but because of world instability. And world instability is caused by Islam's terrorist operations. The Bhutto assassination plus terrorist attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries all add up to major world unrest.
As world instability increases, prices of precious commodities increase. In the first trading day of the New Year, oil, platinum and gold reached record highs on international exchanges. Gold is often considered a hedge against instability because it is the basis of financial instruments.
Instability directly attributed to Islam benefits Islam. As oil prices rise, Islam has windfalls to buy assets. For example, the U.S. Treasury Department reports that OPEC members increased their holdings of U.S. Treasuries 12 percent through July to $123.8 billion. The U.S. Department of Energy estimated in October that OPEC's share of U.S. debt is growing is based on the 31 percent rise in oil since December 2006, which raised OPEC revenue about 4 percent to $630 billion in 2007 and 9 percent to $688 billion in 2008.
Jeremiah 51:14 (NKJV) says, "Surely I will fill you with men as with locusts; and they shall lift up a battle cry against you." Don't be surprised: The prophecy of Jeremiah may be unfolding before our very eyes.
____________________________________
WorldNetDaily is following the prosecutions and sentencing of U.S. District Attorney Johnny Sutton and Judge Kathleen Cardone. This is the prosecution/judicial duo that nailed and convicted former Border Agents Ramos and Compean with dubious evidence and withheld evidence (by Cardone’s judicial order).
Now Sutton has prosecuted and Cardone has convicted another Border Agent on insane dubious circumstances! Noe Aleman has been convicted for harboring illegal aliens. The illegal aliens in question were nieces of his wife whom they were adopting as daughters. The law Aleman broke was brought to the attention of the authorities by Aleman himself: There was a typo in the two girls Visa Papers of allowing them American entrance for one day when it should have been for ninety days.
In order for the adoption not to be screwed up, Aleman alerted Immigration. Aleman was told to come to the office to correct the matter and was assured there was no problem. Upon arrival Aleman was arrested for harboring illegal aliens.
As WND points out, Aleman was prosecuted persecuted for trying to leap through the legal hoops and yet President Bush and proponents of the now defunct Senate immigration legislation were attempting to provide amnesty to “an estimated 20 million illegal aliens”.
This is a pattern of prosecutorial abuse, judicial abuse and moronic immigration legislation. All need to be addressed!
Valerie Plame’s testimony contradicts CIA and government assertions that Plame indeed sent husband Joe Wilson to Niger. Plame denies the assertion vehemently.
So what does that mean? Both Plame and Wilson are liars or the CIA, State Department and White House are liars.
More resources corroborate the CIA, State Department and White House than Plame and Wilson. That would mean Plame has the gall to lie on record at a House hearing.
And AGAIN I raise the question: Why did not Special Persecutor Prosecutor Fitzgerald fulfill his mandate and indict Richard Armitage?
Jack Cashill insinuates a mysterious conspiracy possibility involving or I should I say revolving around Plamegate.
After reading “Joseph Wilson's Original Sin and how the Administration Washed it Away,” I realized I might have been a little slow connecting the dots.
Who sent Wilson to Niger? It has been verified that wifey Valerie Plame sent Wilson. Why did Plame send Wilson? This is the CIA connection I did not get until possibly now. Wilson was highly involved with French interests in providing nuclear material to Saddam Hussein. The CIA was against an Iraqi invasion by the Bush Administration.
Why was the CIA so dead set against an invasion that America’s Cloak and Dagger Company did everything it could to embarrass President Bush and the Administration?
Here is my guess. Iran has been an official enemy of America since Carter sold out the Shah and allowed the Iran Revolution to proceed. As is typical of those in the American bureaucracy that favor Arab assets to accomplish National Interests, I believe the CIA was working with Saddam to do something to a mutual enemy – Iran. In that work relationship, I sense the CIA (some how) schemed with the French without the knowledge of the Bush Administration or perhaps prior to the Bush Administration.
Why do I contemplate an operation was in place prior to the Bush Administration Agenda to take Saddam down? It is because America shipped out 1.77 tons of enriched uranium out of Iraq. The story was brief but mysteriously withdrawn. Now why would the Bush Administration not take advantage of this moment of vindication?
I sense the CIA was trying to sweep complicity to an Iraqi nuclear program that would also implicate France and Russia. By the time the Bush Administration connected the dots about CIA designs that ran counter to a Bush agenda, the invasion was committed to happen or happened.
President Bush had to decide whether to look like a weak President not in control of his own government and expose America to the embarrassment of a Clinton Agenda still moving in the bureaucracy or hide the dual opposite American government agendas to project strength.
I believe the President chose the latter. Unfortunately the less embarrassing choice set Bush up to be a target by unscrupulous Democrats that had only one agenda: to regain power in government at any cost. I believe there are Democrats that are privy to the knowledge of the CIA agenda. I believe Sandy Berger stole Classified Documents and shredded them to protect Clinton and various Democrats who might be traced to the CIA, French and Russian agenda. When those documents were destroyed, President Bush lost a smoking gun to be used against his political enemies.
Thus President Bush was at the mercy of the 2006 election in hope of perpetuating a Bush agenda. The Democrats exploited enough propaganda that voters were swayed to Democrat lies. I sense President Bush has lost his resolve to follow through and acquiescing to political enemies at the expense of American honor.
I usually write or post politics here; however I just read something that casual bloggers and Internet surfers should be interested in. Cell companies have an aim to ban free WiFi. That means if you are lucky enough to be in a location that has free hotspots via WiFi, Cell companies want to end your free access. Why? WiFi is cutting into their bottom line.
John C. Dvorak reporting for PCMAG.COM explains why the Cell companies will kill free WiFi.
As you read this article the thought that might come up is: Who owns the Internet? Is it private corporations or government? I am actually semi-ignorant on the history of the Internet; I am fairly certain the World Wide Web was a government and military instrument of communication. Then somehow Bill Gates invented the PC or at least its popular version.
That would make the Internet a public domain rather than something to be controlled by profit. It is the old question of the collective versus ownership. READ IT
Sandy Berger: This is a man that worked as National Security Advisor to President Slick Willie Clinton. As National Security Advisor, Berger was obviously privy to Classified Documents and Classified knowledge undertaken under the direction of the Clinton Administration.
Sandy Berger at the request of and request of Slick Willie acquired post Clinton Administration access to Classified Documents at the National Archive. Berger destroyed the Classified Documents he selected. This is act is heinous enough, however it happened on MORE than one occasion. Berger went FOUR times to the National Archives before he was caught destroying sensitive documents probably relating to Clinton information on words or actions taken that would not find favorable light.
This smacks of a HUGE conspiracy! Berger takes the fall. Slick Willie again escapes from a tarnished link to illegality. AND Senator Hillary Clinton thus gets a coat of Teflon in which no scum of impropriety sticks.
Here is the Real Clear Politics analysis of Berger’s acts of treason.
President Clinton’s National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught removing and destroying classified documents after the Clinton Presidency and after the terrorism of 9/11.
The ranking member of the 110th Congress Oversight and Government Reform Committee Rep. Tom Davis (VA – R) has released a public statement stipulating the actions of Berger will not be extensively known (i.e. unless Berger blabs – that is unlikely) and thus the damage to National Security and the full picture of the September 11, 2001 attacks delivered to the 9/11 Commission was incomplete.
Can anyone say, “Yet another conspiracy to cover the butts of the husband and wife team.”? Here is the clincher: Berger is receiving a slap on the wrist for his treasonous acts.
The Berger Deal/Meal kind of places a perspective of whom and when Left Wingers go after what is believed to be government cover-ups or worse – crimes. Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald has wasted millions of dollars over Plamegate. The only indictment Fitzgerald has attained is on Scooter Libby (former Chief of Staff of Vice President Cheney) attacking Libby’s memory of the details of releasing information about CIA hack Valery Plame. Fitzgerald is still pressing Libby even after actual person acknowledged for the press release was Richard Armitage. Armitage is an old school Republican and pro-Arab, thus he is anti-Bush.
Millions of dollars spent on lies by Plame and hubby Wilson, punitively less dollars spent on Berger. Is the Left so in control of the Justice Department?
Berger’s actions have severely placed the validity of the findings of the 9/11 Commission in doubt. The doubt is not in the veracity of the findings, but in the information available to the Commission. If the information is skewed or absent the Commission Report cannot be trusted.
Then there are the . If Berger was acting on behalf of his former boss, what was he covering up? Was Berger covering up bad or incompetent decisions by the pertaining to terrorism? Was Berger covering up information that verified reasons for President Bush to attack Saddam’s and the Left did not want that confirmation to come out to the public?
As Representative Tom Davis has found, Americans may never know the truth behind Berger’s actions nor the motives for those actions. The crimes of the Left continue to go unanswered.
Here is a scandal that implicates the former President and wife Senator Hillary Clinton. The scandal relates to President Clinton selling commerce missions for campaign donations for the Clinton/Gore 1996 Presidential campaign. The Depart of Commerce has implicated in the destruction of documents to get Clinton off the hook. I don’t know the extent but wifey Hillary was also involved. The scandal also stretches to conspiracy for then Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown died in a plane crash in Bosnia under mysterious unanswered circumstances. The conspiracy is that Brown’s death was ordered to shut him up.
JRH
************************************************
Clinton Chinagate Scandal Victory
Standard Newswire
December 27, 2006
Judicial Watch Victory: Substantially Prevails in Clinton Scandal FOIA Lawsuit
Clinton Administration Destroyed Documents Involving Illegal Scheme to Sell Taxpayer-Funded Trade Missions for Campaign Contributions
WASHINGTON, Dec. 27 /Standard Newswire/ -- Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. upheld the vast majority of a lower court award to Judicial Watch of nearly $900,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in a lawsuit related to the Clinton fundraising scandals (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Commerce, Appeal No. 05-5366) The fees were awarded on December 1, 2006, after a nearly decade-long court battle between Judicial Watch and the U.S. Department of Commerce.
The scandal involved a scheme by Clinton administration officials to sell seats on taxpayer-funded trade missions in exchange for campaign contributions to the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign. When Judicial Watch began investigating the scandal, Clinton administration officials deliberately concealed and destroyed records regarding the trade missions to avoid releasing them to Judicial Watch. In fact, Ms. Nolanda Hill, a business partner and confidante of then-Clinton Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, testified at a dramatic court hearing during the litigation that the Clinton White House “instructed” Brown "to delay the [Judicial Watch] case by withholding the production of documents prior to the 1996 elections, and to devise a way not to comply with the court’s orders."
Ms. Hill also testified that Brown, who was killed in a plane crash during a trade mission to Bosnia, admitted to her that Hillary Clinton conceived of the scheme to sell trade mission seats. Specifically, the court heard testimony on how Brown allegedly complained about being “Hillary’s [expletive] tour guide.”
Clinton administration misconduct was so egregious that the Commerce Department took the unprecedented step of asking that a judgment be entered against itself in order to end the lawsuit prematurely and stop further revelations. The court denied the Commerce Department’s request, ordered it to conduct a new search for trade mission records and authorized additional discovery into the illegal concealment and destruction of government records.
The lower court also noted that “…disclosures made as a result of this litigation spurred two Congressional committee investigations and a Federal Election Commission investigation into [the Commerce Department’s] alleged sale of foreign mission trade seats. Further, the DOC revised its trade mission participant selection policy to explicitly exclude consideration of past political contributions and activities.” In addition, a criminal inquiry was launched by the Justice Department and FBI.
“We’re pleased the appellate court upheld the award and held the government accountable for its Clinton-era misconduct. Frankly, the Clintons still have a lot to answer for in this scandal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This is a vindication of Judicial Watch’s persistence in prosecuting this long battle to let the sun shine in on government corruption.”
Intro: Clinton Chinagate Scandal Victory
Theway2k
© December 28, 2006
_______________________________________
For information related to Judicial Watch’s Chinagate investigation and related lawsuits, please visit Judicial Watch’s Internet site, www.judicialwatch.org.
© Standard Newswire 2006. All Rights Reserved.