Dem vs Republican

This post is awesome! It is excellent! It is whatever superlative beyond “good” one can think of.

JudgeRight’s post hopefully will enable me to reach a higher plain of blog/comment exchange.

The problem is I have to admit in the intellectual realm I get steamed with Liberal provocative comments based on inaccuracy and downright deception. I have to admit I have fallen into the low brow tit for tat exchanges JudgeRight has described.

To see how to be a better Conservative read JudgeRight’s post entitled, “Liberals Redefining Hatred.”

JRH 4/7/08 (Hat Tip to Humbled Infidel)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Clinton - McCain

I believe Senator McCain would be an awesome leader to guide America toward a victorious resolution on the Global War on Terror (GWOT); however my enthusiasm stops there.

I am deeply invested on turning social issues in America away from a Left Secular Humanist slant back to a Conservative Christian Values slant.

John McCain has consistently bucked Christian Values as a foundation for a standard of life in America and sided with Secular Humanism.

Also McCain is invested in limiting free speech during a period of time just prior to an election. That is the legacy of McCain/Feingold. Thanks to the diligence of the Wisconsin Right to Life organization the Supreme Court ruled in their favor in June 2007, grassroots broadcast advertisements are allowed during the election prohibition period specified in McCain/Feingold; however it still applies to corporate entities and Unions. The design of McCain/Feingold is to squelch criticism of political candidates over broadcast waves during a period of time prior to an election.

There is an organization that is exposing both Mitt Romney’s and John McCain’s past voting record as being Socially Liberal. Both McCain and Romney are running campaign advertisements proclaiming that they are Conservatives. RoeGone.org has exposed that does not line with past voting records in a series posts.

ChristianNewsWire reports that RoeGone.org is beginning to run ads exposing McCain’s leanings toward Left Slanted Social Issues. Left Social Issues is an agenda that is nearly had success in transforming America into a society that accepts hedonistic social relativistic moral values as the norm. For my point of view that is reprehensible.

The femme fatal of the Conservative Right Ann Coulter has come out and said she would vote for Hillary before she would vote for McCain. Now that is a harsh assessment from a gal I love to read. Coulter seems to be a Romney person in the sense that he is the best (her opinion) of the Republican front runners. Coulter also has venom for Huckabee who has the appearance of a Social Conservative but a fiscal Liberal. Huckabee’s biggest black mark is inexperience in foreign affairs at a time when America needs a leader to stand up and buck conventional wisdom and aggressively confront Islamist terrorism around the globe.

Who is the current candidate I am leaning toward? Frankly I waver daily back and forth between McCain and Huckabee. Coulter would be a fool to campaign for a Leftie like Hillary even if she is more moderate than McCain of which I do not agree.

I like Huckabee now purely because he is a Conservative Christian on Social Issues; however the Global War on Terror is the first item of business that needs addressed for America. There might be the problem of electability for Huckabee too. The Lefties will hammer on the false concept of “Separation of Church and State” to influence deceived voters that a vote for Huckabee is an endorsement of government supported religion. This is a concept that is not looked fondly upon by the Left or the Right in America.

So once again I am back to committing myself to whoever wins the Republican nomination and pray the Hand of God is in the choice.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

American Lady (sleeping) march_16__2006

There seemed to be a round of agreement that the Senate legislation on immigration was dead last week. I have come to find out from Newt Gingrich that is not the case. Apparently President George W. Bush in an ever increasing bolt from those who elected him is going to utilize political strong arm tactics in an attempt to push the outrageous immigration bill through the Senate.

It is mobilize the Conservative Forces time and do what I thought would be unthinkable: Oppose the Presidential wishes toward the Senate!

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

(un)holy swastika

Joseph Mattera may not have his facts totally accurate, but he 100% accurate as to Nazism/Fascism is closer to socialism than to the Conservative principles of the Christian Right which is far closer to Capitalism. Capitalism in the Christian sense is a good work ethic not for personal gain (secular view) but rather to prosper in order to further the on Earth and humanity.

Nazism, Fascism, Communism and Socialism are all ideologies in which the State controls and manipulates the standards of individual lives as the State perceives it.

JRH

****************************

Why Hitler’s Beliefs Resonate Today

by Joseph Mattera
Jun 2 2007 07:39PM
JosephGMattera.com
Via Visionary Advancement Strategies

One of the things that agitates me most when I read the newspaper is when someone equates Nazism with Conservatism and so-called right-wing Christianity.

The liberal media elites have successfully brainwashed the American public in such a way that they have constructed a view of Hitler that is quite the opposite of reality!

First of all, we need to understand that the term Nazism means National Socialism. (For example, the USSR stood for the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics).

If anything, Hitler, Nazism, and Fascism more closely resemble present day left-wing liberals than those who espouse a conservative political view.

Furthermore, when you read the writings of Karl Marx and his book The Communist Manifesto, you find that the modern day liberal intellects in universities and our liberal elected officials are more dedicated to the ideals of Communism and Karl Marx than to the ideals that made our nation great!

First of all, let’s paint a true picture of Fascism.

The socialistic ideals of Fascism are harder to detect, because within its system the state allows private ownership, but with many burdensome rules, regulations and laws that essentially control every aspect of the decision making process of the alleged private owners.

I tell folks all the time that the is more closely related to both Socialism and Fascism than to Capitalism because the immense size of our state, city and federal governments interferes, intervenes and regulates every aspect of life. This contradicts the vision the Founding Fathers had of a small government that was by the people and for the people, whose main objective was to ensure every citizen the unalienable rights given to us by our Creator (note the Declaration of Independence).

If you don’t believe what I am saying, just refuse to pay your property taxes. Then you will find out who really owns your house. (Property taxes are so high in some regions, it is akin to paying another mortgage–only this time we are paying rent to the state!)

Involved with Hitler’s Fascism were:

-Strict gun control laws. German citizens, especially every politically incorrect German citizen, had their guns confiscated.

 

-Legalized euthanasia and abortion.

 

-State controlled education and indoctrination of children, including the rewriting of German history.

 

-Acceptance of homosexuality as part of their manhood. Some believe this was one reason why they killed Bible-believing Christians and Jews; their tenets contradicted the homosexual lifestyle, though effeminate homosexuals were also executed because it belittled their Arian manhood.

 

-Rules, regulations and high taxes interwoven with private property and business.

 

-A progressive income tax.

Does this all sound familiar?

Are these ideals more closely related to Communism and its kissing cousin Socialism or to moral and political conservatives?

One of the biggest tragedies in the past 150 years has been the “dumbing down” of Christianity and of our young.

Marx, Lenin, Hitler and others had to rewrite history and deemphasize the Christian influence as part of their plan to control the masses.

Our nation has been in moral decline primarily because we as Christians have been taught to throw our brains out the window and only think about the next life!

Instead of starting schools like Harvard, Yale, Columbia and Princeton (which all originally existed for the express purpose of training Christians to lead in every realm of society with a biblical world and life view), we tend to isolate and separate our spiritual meeting place from the marketplace, and speak of doctrine, theology and anything intellectual as if it were unspiritual and anti-Christian. This is the very opposite of what is necessary to disciple the nations and be salt and light to the world!

I believe churches need to start having altar calls in our services for young people to become educators, economists, lawyers, doctors, judges, community and civic leaders, not just missionaries and preachers!

We need to teach the truth about ’s Christian history, and Christianity’s influence on our nation’s founding documents, such as the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and even the U.S. Constitution.

If all we are concerned about as Christian leaders is having an anointed Sunday service, and do nothing to raise up the next generation to engage the culture in the battle of ideas, then one day we won’t even have the right to have our anointed services!

As Hitler continued to increase in power until he controlled every aspect of life for every citizen, we are presently witnessing the liberal elite change the history books, do away with biblical law, attempt to remove every vestige of Christianity from public view, and transition our nation from a republic (the people electing representatives to rule for them) to an oligarchy (the government is made up of a handful of ruling elite; e.g. how the Supreme Court and the judiciary presently function in this country).

Ignorance is not a blessing; it is not bliss, nor benign. It is a curse and its passivity has been responsible for the shed blood of millions, born and unborn!

A few years ago the Lord showed me that it is time for me to come out of hiding and to impact both the church and society with the Gospel of the .

Thousands of other saints are hearing the same call!

Join this powerful movement and as we proactively move forward, the gates of hell will not prevail against the church!

Together, we are unstoppable!

About Visionary Advancement Strategies: We are Robert & Joyce Ricciardelli. We are Marketplace servants of our Lord Jesus Christ. By the grace of God, our newsletters now reach over 150 countries and 40,000 leaders. Although we have a local church, we identify ourselves with all expressions of ONE body of Christ, regardless of denomination,race,creed or pedigree. We work with leaders from every context of life who desire to bring the kingdom of God into the arenas the Lord has called them into. We are connectors in the kingdom as we come alongside ministries in many nations. We are bringing forth a message of kingdom living for today by restoring a biblical world view and helping believers understand their marketplace role in all jurisdictions. We are involved in community transformation projects by bringing the spiritual leaders and gatekeepers of a community together. In unity we believe for the Lord of the harvest to heal their land and their people and birth relevant service that brings glory to the Lord. We continue to live and move and have our being in Him, and seek to always have and teach an unoffendable heart towards others which gives us the freedom to be about our Father's business.

Visionary Advancement Strategies International is the Ricciardellis' personal website.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Usa or un sovereignty

President Bush is rapidly declining in popularity with Conservatives. The President has been hated almost hysterically by Leftists and Democrats for nearly seven years.

Dwell on this: Internet buzz is a major modem of Conservative dissemination of information because Conservatives KNOW the Mainstream Media (MSM) will not truthfully portray a story that supports Conservatism or President Bush. The difficulty with Internet dependence is that the information dissemination needs to often be verified by many reputable Conservative sources before it can be conceivable that the information has not been warped or planted merely as propaganda.

Now that the President is becoming unpopular with Conservatives he has become the target of Conservative venom as nearly the twenty-first century Benedict Arnold of Conservativism and Neoconservativism. There is a laundry list of betrayals: Ramos and Campos imprisoned for stopping illegal aliens doing drug smuggling, I. Scooter Libby being allowed to be convicted on trumped up charges, the harassment of Tom DeLay, collaboration with a Democratic Senate on a controversial illegal alien Bill and on and on.

Cliff Kinkaid who writes for Accuracy in Media is a person of huge respect as a source of information. I say that to honor him. Kinkaid has written an article that adds to the Conspiracy Theory of George W. Bush flirting with selling out. The Bush Administration has called the concept of a North American Union (Canada, America and Mexico) is rumor and manipulation of a little fact to create a lot of myth. Kinkaid cites evidence to the contrary. Kinkaid reports that President Bush could not pass the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) when the Republicans controlled the Senate. Kinkaid believes that Bush can push UNCLOS through a Democratic controlled Senate. Kinkaid believes the NAU and UNCLOS are both instances that will pass American sovereignty away from the USA and to the United Nations.

Are these issues Conspiracy Theories that should be banished to the works of fiction? OR are these issues the shadows of a changing global politic that will affect traditional American Constitutional government and sovereignty?

You really should read Cliff Kinkaid:

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

George W. Bush 9-15-06

The Bush Administration is becoming more and more isolated in its political clout as 2008 nears. The straw that broke the camel’s back was the Republican loss of control in the Senate and House in 2006.

Now that the Democrats have vested political power via legislation, their money donations or money donated to anti-Bush organizations is increasing by volumes. This affords the Democrats (in Party and Leftist organizations) a propaganda machine that is mighty and difficult to correct.

Worse for President Bush is that the one time centralized Conservative pundits, politicians and blogs have become fractured with a few still supporting the President but many abandoning him over their own pet peeve agendas.

As the Politico puts it “the Bush White House Juggernaut” has been broken. With the huge Conservative dissent on the White House/Senate proposed legislation about illegal aliens, I am convinced the President is feeling very squeezed.

I myself stand by President Bush’s decisions to confront terrorism at home and abroad; however there is a huge appearance that the execution of planning was deficient.

Afghanistan and Iraq should have been invaded. The former for its obvious support of al-Qaeda and its Islamofascist homicidal suicide attack on American soil; the later is justified because of Saddam’s support for global terrorism and the genocide of his own nation’s citizens that were a source of challenge to his Sunni/tribal power base.

Bush’s mistake was not using the proper documented reasoning for the invasion; rather the Administration used the WMD card. I still believe that card is viable unfortunately lack of planning allowed Saddam or Russia or Syria to extricate the smoking gun of the existence of WMD. I don’t know if Bush was prepared to take a political hit by allowing the Russians to cover-up their complicity in aiding Saddam or if the American leadership was inept and allowed the WMD to be withdrawn from Iraq. We may never know or if historians are lucky, fifty years down the road some nations archives are opened to allow the truth to come out. (Some what like the Soviet murders the Czar’s family and Communist infiltration into American government.)

The President obviously had his own tools to counter anti-war Leftist and Democratic Party propaganda but failed to use them. NOW the President is forced to make unsavory deals with the devil to get anything moving politically for the rest of his term of Office. If the Left becomes too fringe, the only weapon President Bush has now is the VETO.

Let us pray President Bush makes good decisions the rest of his term AND let us pray Conservatives can once again unite behind someone to take down the Democrats. (My favorite has not even announced a candidacy as yet: Fred Thompson)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Republican In Name Only, Heidi Hooper

J. B. Williams has written an article that is worthy of examination by Conservatives. The essence of Williams’ theme is most Conservatives are Republicans but not all Republicans are Conservative. If the Conservative base of the Republican Party chooses a Presidential candidate in the belief of electability, then the Conservatives have diluted their ideology to defeat Leftist Democrats.

Williams posits if a Left oriented Republican is elected, what is the difference from electing a Leftist Democratic President? A Left thinking Republican would appoint liberal judges to the Judiciary, accommodate the homosexual agenda, look the other way when Christophobe secular humanist delete more and more Christianity from the American community and on and on.

The reason Williams’ essay caught my eye is that I was leaning toward looking at a Republican that could beat a Democrat at all costs. I was leaning to the thinking a RINO was better than Leftist Democratic Party hegemony.

Now I am leaning to the thought that a non-Conservative Republican President is a Democrat in sheep’s clothing.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Bush Speaking T. Roosevelt in background

There is the emerging appearance of a Watergate type scandal that may link to the White House. Is the scandal related to the Iraq War? Only in an off hand way is the answer.

The scandal has to do with the mysterious choice to allow prosecution of people who are obviously framed or set up to take a fall.

The first to come mind is Scooter Libby. The purpose for his prosecution is ludicrous and had zero to do with leaking Valerie Plame’s name to the Mainstream Media (MSM). Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald had a mandate to go after the person who leaked a useless CIA agent (Plame) to the MSM. Fitzgerald did not go after the person who he did know (viz. Richard Armitage); rather he went after a person that could embarrass the Bush Administration (Libby). Libby had zero to do with the leak.

The next judicial mystery has to do with Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. At first I believed this was just Left Wing bureaucracy persecuting the Conservative agenda to favor spread favor to the benefit of the Democrat Party. These prosecutions are beginning to take on the image of President Bush having a hand in the prosecutions. He has not spoken publicly of the outrageous actions. Bush’s power base is calling for Executive Pardons for Libby, Ramos and Compean; however it is as if Bush has ear plugs and blinders on.

Is there a secret agenda that even the Republican base would be horrified with? Could the unthinkable be correct put forth about Bush? Is the Bush agenda more than a Conservative agenda? Will Bush prove this an insane speculation and step up with the stones to pardon Ramos, Compean and Libby?

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Dinesh D'Souza 2

Imagine that the Pelosi Democrats and the radical Mohammedans symbolized by Osama bin Laden were in an unspoken alliance to do whatever it takes to nullify the Bush Administration and the Conservative movement in America.

What if the Left/Radical Mohammedan alliance was spoken? I rather think (or at least hope) that is unlikely; however the public speeches and intentions of the two groups have the appearance of the mutual slap on the back.

Dinesh D’Souza discusses this very heinous appearance of cooperation.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Freedom of Speech

A few days ago I received an email from the American Family Association warning that the Senate was preparing to take away Conservative Bloggers ability to exercise free Speech prior to National Elections. Now I have found confirmation that the Democratic Party controlled House is preparing to engage in similar legislation.

Democrat Kucinich is advocating legislation that requires equal media time for controversial issues. If this legislation passes it will nearly put Conservative TV and Radio hosts out of business because the cost of air time for a rebuttal would lead to the program cancellation.

This will lead the Democratic Party to control what the public hears and thus render it difficult for Conservatives to expose Left Wing hypocrisy and morally depraved positions. The Mainstream Media is already dominating the dissemination of information from a Left Slant. Just think of the iron fisted grip over information the Left would have over freedom speech. It is heinous situation.

Blogs For Bush exposes the Democrat plan.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend