Dr. Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester

There are two Archbishops in Britain duking it out verbally in public over the affect of Mohammedanism in Britain.

Ironically Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams appears to be the appeasement minded head of the Anglican Church that is calling for a multiculturalism that accepts Mohammedan Sharia Law to compete or override the British rule of law as it applies to enforcement in Britain.

The Archbishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali by name is of Pakistani descent. Archbishop Nazir-Ali has been writing about how Mohammedanism is fracturing British society establishing in there are actually “no-go areas” for Brits in which the harshness of Sharia Law is exercised contrary to British Law.

Does America have this moronic appeasement to look forward to as Secular Humanists attempt to eradicate the influence of Christianity and accommodate the religion of Mohammedanism?

JRH 5/12/08

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Mossad Crest 2

Remember the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 that proclaimed to the world that Iran had abandoned a weapons program in connection with the building of their weapons grade nuclear plant?

When that NIE report came out Iran crowed the big International “I told you so.”

But here is the thing: the NIE 2007 contradicted previous NIE reports and did not align with Israeli Intelligence. Many anti-war Westerners obviously would slough off Israeli Intelligence due to the fact that Israel and Iran are mortal enemies publicly in the war of words and behind the back door with the hushed diplomatic channels on obvious Iranian military supplies to Hezbollah and Hamas. Those two Islamist murdering terrorists (one is Shi’ite and the latter is Sunni) have one agenda: the destruction of Israel and the genocide of Jews.

But lo and behold it is becoming evident that NIE 2007 was a report put together by pro-Arab/pro-Islam oil authors because recent events (including the Israeli destruction of a secret Syrian nuclear program) and verified Intelligence from both British and Israeli Intelligence sheds light on a different outcome than NIE 2007. That outcome is indeed that Iran is has a nuke weapons program.

Apparently if the pro-Arab/pro-oil American Intelligence is willing to look the other way to embarrass the Bush Administration, Mossad of Israel and MI6 of Britain are collaborating and putting Intelligence notes that are leaning strongly to another conclusion completely divergent of the American Intelligence Community (an amalgam of Intelligence Agencies) headed by the Director of National Intelligence that collated the data to arrive at the NIE 2007 conclusion on Iran’s agenda.

Mossad and MI6 believe there is substantial evidence to execute some form of military strike on Iran to slow down or hopefully end Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Israel is even willing to risk a go it alone mission. Israel is hoping to get at least an OK from Washington and London to back up such an expedition since Leftists in both nations would scream bleeding heart murder if the American and British governments participated in such an endeavor.

My guess is that an Israeli strike would provoke a Middle Eastern free-for-all military chess that would draw America and possibly Western nations into the fray. That is not even mentioning the probable support of Iran by Russia and China that could range from limited to the extreme.

Wake up America! The Islamist/Western confrontation is on the horizon.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Free Speech Silenced

Here is a supportive update on Lionheart, the British blogger facing hate crimes prosecution if he returns to his homeland.

Evidently there is an attempt to smear Lionheart's anti-Islamist credentials because an interview with a blog that some feel has fascist leanings. I say “some” because in the comment section of the post Lionheart defends his character the commenter decries the white supremacist moniker ascribed to the blog that interviewed Lionheart.

Atlas Shrugs on Lionheart

BlogTalkRadio vindication interview of Lionheart

Read what Lionheart has to say:

JRH 2/11/08

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Archbishop of Cant. Rowan Williams 2

It is beginning to boggle my mind how the Western World is being dictated to on the rule of law by a foreign culture that is a proven in violence among themselves and toward those who do not believe in that foreign culture. What am I talking about? It is the Theo-political cult known as Islam to the politically correct and as Mohammedanism to me after its blood thirsty founder Mohammed.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams is the symbolic head of Anglicans world wide, which includes the American version known as Episcopalians. Dr. Williams is publicly saying that Britain should adopt or incorporate Mohammedan Sharia Law into the legal system of Britain to accommodate the vast numbers of Mohammedans living in Britain.

I have some observations about this suggestion from the Archbishop of Canterbury. Let me start with my initial reaction when I first read this: Is the moron abandoning the Christian faith to a Theo-political cult whose aim is to convert people first by persuasion and second by the threat of violence up to and including execution? I mean Europe is all about Capital Punishment being the practice of a barbaric past. Yet the essence of Sharia Law is physically harsh up to including the death penalty for some of the most ludicrous of acts of law breaking. We are talking about honor killings for offending the Mohammedanism within the Mohammedan family, death for leaving Mohammedanism for another faith or atheism, death for insulting Mohammed and his Allah and probably more that I am unaware of.

Sharia Law allows polygamy and a means to divorce by simply pronouncing verbally I divorce you three times. Thieves punished under Sharia Law can loose hands in amputation. And what if a Mohammedan breaks a British law that is not illegal in Sharia Law - does the Mohammedan escape justice?

God help us if this becomes an issue in America.

If Mohammedans cannot live under the Rule of Law in the West the answer is simple: move to nations that practices Sharia Law or amend the Mohammedan faith to be compatible to Western Laws.

In America where religious issues and the Rule of Law is a big deal there is a precedent to follow. America is a secular nation that guarantees the free practice of religion of conscience as long as it conforms to the Rule of Law. The Precedent: Before Utah could be admitted into the Union of the United States of America the Mormons had to have a prophetic revelation; i.e. the official ending of the practice of polygamy. Once the revelation became official, Utah became a State.

My God America needs to stick to our foundational values to enforce one Rule of Law justly to all people regardless of Faith or Conscience and Britain should as well.

If the West does not stand up for its culture the permeation of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda for the West will become a reality before anyone can do anything to peacefully reverse it. Friends this will mean dhimmitude for non-Mohammedans.

I have never agreed with the term or the liberal church vision of a “Progressive Church.” The Archbishop of Canterbury is progressing Anglicans into a position of inferiority to the supremacist minded Mohammedans of the world.

See also Dhimmi Watch.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Support Lionheart Blogger

Something that is not getting a lot of play on the media is the Free Speech persecution of a British Blogger known as Lionheart.

The last I heard he was flying back to Britain knowing that he was to be arrested as he stepped off the plane. Why the arrest? Lionheart is an ex-miscreant who turned his life around by becoming a Christian. Stories of turning one’s life around by becoming a Christian are rare stories in Europe these days.

I am unaware what Lionheart does to pay the bills; however his trouble with the British law is over his Blog’s writing about the threat of Islamism to Western society. Evidently a Mohammedan complained to the authorities in Britain that Lionheart’s blogs were incitement to hate-speech. You see there is no First Amendment right of freedom of speech in Britain as it is protected in America. In Britain a simple act of Parliament can redefine the parameters of Freedom of Speech.

This is what Lionheart is a victim of. Britain has a hate crimes law that if publications or speech is offensive to a race, creed, religion, gender etc.; then it is an equivalent of an American felony. That means if you point out acts of hatred as part of a religion, an offended member of that religion can press charges for hate speech.

Not being from Britain this may not be the precise definition; however it is the essence of Lionheart’s legal problems. Lionheart is anti-jihadi and anti-Islamist. Lionheart’s exposés of the jihad-Islamist mentality of much of the British Muslim population is criminal in Britain.

I have not run into any news about what has happened to Lionheart after he stepped off that plane; however I have ran into some information about what Lionheart is doing that the British law enforcement has determined enough to warrant an arrest.

This information comes from the Jillosophy blog. I will post her information with a few formatting changes at this blog.

JRH

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Tariq Daour,Younis Tsouli, Waseem Mughal - cyber-terrorists

The al Qaeda attack apparently might have an Anglo-American connection. It is now reported that 45 Mohammedan Doctors have been planning attacks in America via an Internet Café in Britain (not smart and thus may be a diversionary hoax).

It is true the Leftist apologists of the West blame Islamofascism as an offshoot to the poverty of Mohammedans in the Middle East and Mohammedan immigrants in the West. HELLO! Forty-five Doctors are professional and educated people. It takes dough to become a Doctor. The Theo-political ideology of al Qaeda and their cousin Islamofascist terrorist organizations is being led by educated people who are exploiting the poorer Mohammedans with propaganda; ergo an Islamofascist is born.

I have written in the past that America and the West must change their mind-set toward radical Mohammedanism (oft times referred to as Islamism). We in the West and/or America need to get behind a new paradigm that eschews Political Correctness (PC) with an exchange to a mind-set comparable to the reality of the Mohammedan threat to the West.

A blog site known as Webbloggin vicariously agrees with my assessment, which of course has stirred some excitement for me. It is good to know there are bloggers that are bold enough to write about reality in the face of the certain accusation of racism or Islamophobia.

Webbloggin writes of curtailing or eliminating Mohammedan immigration. I agree as long as the primary ideology promulgated by Mohammedans (almost evangelistically) is the Wahhabi-Sunni or the Twelver-Shi’ite Theo-political ideology. This ideology is a fanaticism that makes the Marxism of Lenin, Stalin and Mao look like a picnic. It melds politics with religion in such a way that it is intolerant and intransient toward change and modern thinking. This Islamofascist Theo-politics is violent in its nature deriving its ideology from the most violent parts of the Quran and its sub-writings such as the Hadith and Sharia Law (to name a few).

Who has the courage in the media, the Western intellectuals and Western politicians to stand up for Western Culture (whether Leftist or Conservative) against this radical Mohammedan Theo-political ideology?

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Iran trust in bomb - err - Mahdi (God)

The fear of an impending military strike and possible invasion was the cause for the British Marine/Sailors to be released NOT the magnanimity of President Ahmadinejad. Newsmax sources paint a picture of Iranian ruling elites squabbling over potential unpleasant scenarios. The elites that won were the “release the Brits” faction. Ahmadinejad merely spun a typical propaganda scheme for PR to his people in Iran.

Eric Stakelbeck gets the hit tip; he is the one with the sources.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Christian Knight Calling Defend Western Civ

So-called moderate Mohammedans in and say that “Jihad” merely means “inner struggle.” The Jawa Report exposes a Birmingham, Britain Mosque as urging Western Muslims to engage in Jihad, the kind in which people are killed.

Jawa Report shows when this Birmingham Mosque was exposed; they removed many links that encouraged violence and death against the Kafir (those that do NOT believe in Mohammedanism). One of those that were recently removed was entitled, “39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad" and "A Declaration of War" written by Osama bin Laden.

The Birmingham Mosque forgot to remove one link: The Ruling on Jihad and its Divisions by Sheik Yusuf al-Uyaari. This pro-Jihad PDF file explains the difference between greater and lesser Jihad. It also makes the point that the greater Jihad is to spread Mohammedanism across the entire globe killing those who do not convert. The greater Jihad according to the document is preeminent for today.

I downloaded the PDF file just in case the Birmingham Mosque pulls that link as well. Let me know and if you are interested I will email it to you.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

British Marines-Sailor in Iran photo

Iran wanted to humiliate the British by sanctimoniously proclaiming there would be no negotiation for marine/sailor release until the Brits admitted their cohort was in Iranian waters.

The British have responded with the smoking gun proof that indeed it was Iran that violated Iraqi waters and in an act of war kidnapped the British Marines/Sailors.

Obviously Iran is using some kind of threat on the captured Brits, for the lone female was made to say on video the Brits were in Iranian waters. So despite the pictures of the captured Brits heartily eating a meal, some kind of mind manipulation or extortion is in play.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Apopcalypse_big_1

AEI’s Michael Rubin also thinks what did was an act of war. Why? The taking of the British Marines/Sailors was methodically planned and carried out by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend