16 posts tagged “ann coulter”
I love Ann Coulter’s sarcastic wit especially when the Left, Obamanites, and anti-war morons looking for defeat. Coulter unleashes that wit in this column entitled, “Natural-Born Losers.”
Get ready for a good laugh at the expense of the Leftist Democratic Party that convinced America to vote for the greatest appeaser since Neville Chamberlain.
JRH 10/15/09
Ann Coulter reviews the stark similarities of the Coleman/Franken Minnesota recount to that of the 2004 Washington State Gubernatorial recount. In Washington State the Republican candidate led the day after the initial vote. The Dems forced several recounts in which mysterious lost ballots kept appearing until the Dems had the majority and certified the Dem candidate as the winner.
Coulter and I wonder if the same stunt will happen in Minnesota.
JRH 12/4/08
Ann Coulter questions the reliability of polls when the Dems poll a lead. I for one pray she is correct for the pollsters are painting a dark picture about McCain. Leftist Dems are jumping on that poll analysis train claiming victory even before the November 4 election.
If Coulter is correct it is evidence of Mainstream collusion to amplify pro-BHO propaganda to push McCain aside.
JRH 10/16/08
Shucks I wish I would read this a couple of days ago. Ann Coulter utilizes her piercing anti-Leftist wit to praise Governor Palin and demean the hypocrites on the Left.
JRH 9/5/08
I love Ann Coulter’s stinging wit and prose that are most often reserved for moonbats on the Left. Coulter is caught up in the GOP race for President which is understandable since she is obviously a Conservative.
Thus the Candidates that Ann does not endorse on the GOP side have been the recipients of the usually magnificent vitriol reserved for Leftists. Ann has been railing on McCain for some time; here is her latest post on Senator McCain. Here is a piece critical of Huckabee. And way back in October 2007 she tag teamed on my man Fred (since folded) and Huckabee together.
As of mid January it appears that Ann has settled to write favorably about Mitt Romney as a true Conservative.
In some of her articles attacking other Republicans Ann (and remember I think she is a sharp double edged sword for Dems) harangues Republican voters for not doing their home work when Romney lost or came in a close second.
If you have read my posts about Romney, the biggest negative I have against him is his Mormon faith which I consider a cultic knock-off of Christianity. Incidentally I do support Romney’s choice of practicing Mormonism for there is Freedom of Religion in America; however as a Christian I have to point out the attributes of Mormonism do not run true to Christian Faith (Catholic, Protestant or Eastern Orthodox). Secularists would say religion should not be a factor in voting. I say if a Candidate contradicts your values and faith, then religion is a factor.
Here is the irony about Mitt Romney. As Governor of Massachusetts he often voted on the side of social Liberalism and not social Conservatism as a good Mormon should. Mormon’s may be a cult; however they endorse good Christian morality such as pro-life and anti-abortion as one example. As a Governor, Romney voted pro-abortion. Romney has claimed to have a moral transformation in his beliefs in 2004; however it sounds like a political transformation to hook the Christian Right.
Do I think Romney would be a good Administrative President? I would have to say yes. AND if he was the nominee for the GOP I would vote for him; however in the GOP selection stage Romney is not the guy.
I don’t know who the GOP guy is either. McCain would also be a good Administrator but he leans toward too many Leftist causes. I think McCain would be excellent to steer America toward victory on the War on Terror. Huckabee has become the darling of the Christian Right because of his open support of for social Conservatism; however like McCain and Giuliani he has a past of aiding illegal aliens. Huck has sounded profoundly ignorant on foreign affairs and he has a reputation for raising taxes (even if the taxes were mandated by the Courts). Giuliani is also a social Liberal and soft on illegal immigration; however he is tough on crime and would at least be a leader to win the War on Terror.
When the primary hits my neck of the woods, I won’t vote for Romney and I am extremely uncertain about whom else to vote for. I do no I will not vote for Ron Paul because he has not been forthcoming about Newsletters written in his name that were racist in his past. Paul has only taken responsibility for an error he was unaware of and that is not a believable defense. I would be more impressed if he disavowed the Newsletters as an aberration of a Southern cultural past and he has moved into the 21st century as many Southerners have indeed transformed from bigotry of the past to a more equality minded bent in the present. This has not happened.
Back to Coulter’s support of Romney: in this case I do not think she has done her homework or if she has, Coulter is less a social Conservative and more a fiscal and political/secular Conservative. This would disappointingly mean Coulter does not place a premium on Biblical morality and values.
The President of the American Right to Life Action has criticized Coulter for supporting a pro-abortionist in Mitt Romney. I would add Mormonism.
Ann Coulter again defends M. Stanton Evan’s book “Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies.”
Evidently a Leftist historian by the name of Ronald Radosh has been accusing Evans of plagiarizing his own book “The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism.”
Coulter exposes Radosh as the Moonbat liar. READ IT.
I like Ann Coulter because she is Conservative who is not afraid to rock the Politically Correct boat. In her latest column Coulter not only takes on the hypocrisy of the Left’s tendency to promote an image of multicultural tolerance while disdaining Conservatives as all things evil and Christianity as an old myth which only the unintelligent still follow; Coulter makes a stab at the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a Leftist organization.
The launching pad for Coulter’s venom toward the ADL is because the ADL has attacked Dennis Prager (a Jewish individual) for his anti-Islamist stand.
The only criticism I have of Coulter’s column is the appearance of sympathy for the implied criticism of the ADL of Senator Robert Byrd’s racist past. Byrd was a card carrying and recruiting member of the Klu Klux Klan in old West Virginia. (Read a Conservatives view of Byrd’s KKK past HERE and the Slanted Left View of Byrd’s KKK past HERE.) Coulter may be expressing tongue-in-cheek however it is odd even in that way to show sympathy for a slanted Left aged Democrat with a racist past.
Otherwise Coulter’s analogies are right on piercing of Leftist hypocrisy with the reality of truth. Apparently the ADL has become so Left wing it is more concerned with Leftist ideology than with the survival of the existence of the Land of Israel, a Land that owes its modern existence to the butchery of Hitler’s Nazi/Fascist Holocaust.
Can you name the primary goal of Islamofascism? Its goal is the execution of a second Holocaust of Jews, particularly the ones living Israel.
Ann Coulter’s “Pretend to Be All You Can Be” article is one of the best I have read from her.
The lift off point is the Democratic Party in Congress wishing to publicly censure Rush Limbaugh for his “phony soldier” comments about veterans that are liberals or veterans that Democratic Party Office holders and are hatriots of the War on Terror.
The real theme though is the ACTUALITY that there is a long dirty laundry list of phony soldiers that are protesting the War on Terror. Coulter aptly and generously makes her case – it is awesome! READ IT!
Ann Coulter makes an excellent point about the Democrats: that Political Party of Moonbats and scalawags knew how to respond to Patraeus before Patraeus gave his report to Congress. How can the Slanted Right make that accusation? The proof is in the pattern of defeatism from the time the Bush Administration decided to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
Alright this is awesome! Two of my favorite female political polemicists have gone on the attack at fiction writer Scott Thomas Beauchamp received as fact by the New Republic. Those two gals are Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter.
I posted Malkin’s article Winter Soldier Syndrome just following a piece I wrote as the source inspiration. Now I have just read the political wit, humor and insight of Ann Coulter. I enjoyed it for she touches on some similar associations that I saw. That is very gratifying when it comes a national syndicated columnist as Ann Coulter.
By the way the New Republic is incredibly sticking by Beauchamp’s Baghdad Diarist entries as fact proclaiming that statements by Army Spokesman Major Steven Lamb published by the Weekly Standard are the lies.
Here is Ann Coulter’s version.
