Woolsey on WWIV and PA not Deserving of State

Comments

There is a bit of a problem in charging that Arabs are anti-Semites. Arabs are Semites. If one wants to find the rise of anti-Semitisms directed at the Jews we can better trace it to some Christian leaders of the 4th Century AD, such as St. John Chrysostom.

Chrysostom was very effective in spreading hatred for the Jews. He was so eloquent that he was known as the Golden Tongue. According to him, not only were the Jews the murders of Christ, they were the most worthless of all men: lecherous, greedy, rapacious, devil worshipers and they are their religion was a sickness that placed them beyond amends or forgiveness.

Indeed you are correct that there is huge history of anti-semitism on the part of what history otherwise paints as well respected theologians and men of God. However those anti-semitical Christians did not match up with the Savior who said, "Forgive them, they know not what they do."

Now this is opposed to Mohammed who said "kill them where you can find them." (paraphrase)

Isn't ironic that when the Gentiles began to dominate Christianity they were anti-semitical in contradiction to their faith and Mohammedans in the Middle Ages were more tolerant of Jews in contradiction to their faith. Today the Mohammedans are making up for lost time to the point they teach as fact to their children that Jews are pigs (offensive to Jew and Mohammedan), Jews use the blood of Mohammedan children in baking, Jews are inherently evil and so we must glorify the shahid (i.e. the murderer that kills others by committing suicide) and kinds of other hatred.

Mohammedan hypocrisy has even reached the level in which they can spew all kinds of hatred to Christians and Jews and Left Wingers (like the Democratic Party) defends that hatred as free speach.

BUT when a Christian of a Jew corrects the Mohammedan errors it is a hate crime. Flip Flop.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in