Ann Coulter and the ADL
I like Ann Coulter because she is Conservative who is not afraid to rock the Politically Correct boat. In her latest column Coulter not only takes on the hypocrisy of the Left’s tendency to promote an image of multicultural tolerance while disdaining Conservatives as all things evil and Christianity as an old myth which only the unintelligent still follow; Coulter makes a stab at the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a Leftist organization.
The launching pad for Coulter’s venom toward the ADL is because the ADL has attacked Dennis Prager (a Jewish individual) for his anti-Islamist stand.
The only criticism I have of Coulter’s column is the appearance of sympathy for the implied criticism of the ADL of Senator Robert Byrd’s racist past. Byrd was a card carrying and recruiting member of the Klu Klux Klan in old West Virginia. (Read a Conservatives view of Byrd’s KKK past HERE and the Slanted Left View of Byrd’s KKK past HERE.) Coulter may be expressing tongue-in-cheek however it is odd even in that way to show sympathy for a slanted Left aged Democrat with a racist past.
Otherwise Coulter’s analogies are right on piercing of Leftist hypocrisy with the reality of truth. Apparently the ADL has become so Left wing it is more concerned with Leftist ideology than with the survival of the existence of the Land of Israel, a Land that owes its modern existence to the butchery of Hitler’s Nazi/Fascist Holocaust.
Can you name the primary goal of Islamofascism? Its goal is the execution of a second Holocaust of Jews, particularly the ones living Israel.
Comments
I am grateful for the information however it appears you were distracted.
You ended with: "He also wanted 50 year ..."
Rabbi Kahane wanted 50 year what?
Sorry it must have been cut off. Kahane wanted up to 50 year in prison for Jewish Gentile sexual relations. See the video above Kahane vs. the Kibbutznikim which in on you tube.
However, the reality is that Rabbi Kahane and Chaim at one point worked for the Jewish Press and in that newspaper the daughter's editor wanted a divorce and the husband didn't want to give a divorce. (IN Judaism the man has to give the divorce. I don't think it is unfair because a man has to compensate a women for a divorce which he should.) Women don't compensate a man in any way. The newspaper becaue very big on divorce for women whenever they want with no concern of the consequences to children and Kahane went along with the daughters divorce and the general divorce culture of this newspaper. I really think that some of these crazy idea's was to hide that he really was very liberal on Jewish women divorcing their husbands for frivilous reasons's and this was to hide the fact. I believe as a marry another JEwish women but his idea's are crazy.